Attorney Mario Apuzzo Discussed the Natural Born Citizen Issue of Kamala Harris on ‘Handling the Truth’ BlogTalkRadio Thursday 20 Aug 2020 at 8 P.M. EDT

Attorney Mario Apuzzo, an attorney who is an expert on citizenship issues,  discussed the “natural born Citizen” issue of Kamala Harris on the ‘Handling the Truth’ BlogTalkRadio Show on Thursday 20 Aug 2020 at 8 P.M. EDT with show hosts Terry Dodd and Mike Gaddy.  Tune in live or listen to it on podcast at:  https://www.blogtalkradio.com/drkatesrevolutionradio/2020/08/21/handling-the-truth-with-rebel-madman-tenacity

Kamala Harris - Jamaican CitizenKamala Harris was born a  Jamaican Citizen at Birth via her foreign national Jamaican citizen father who was sojourning in the USA on a temporary VISA. She also had a citizen of India mother who was also sojourning in the USA on a temporary VISA. Her mother divorced her father and the mother moved to Canada with Kamala while Kamala was very young. Canada is where Kamala grew up during her crucial formative years. It is not known if Kamala’s mother and or Kamala by derivation gained Canadian citizenship while in Canada. Another question Kamala needs to be asked.

Both her parents were in the USA on temporary VISA’s and neither were permanent residents or citizens of the USA. Kamala was thus born with dual-Citizenship and divided and multiple attendant allegiance requirements to two countries at birth. She is a classic “citizen of the world” in her upbringing and views and does not have allegiance by birth solely and only to the USA. She was born with foreign influence and allegiance requirements to Jamaica on her by birth. She could go to the Jamaican entry and get a Jamaican at birth passport, if she does not already have one. That’s a question she should be asked. Do you have now or did you ever have in the past a Jamaican passport.?

The presidential eligibility clause and 12th Amendment (last line) in our U.S. Constitution is to be a strong check against persons born with foreign influence gaining control of our highest elected offices and becoming the Commander in Chief of our military, either via the front door or the VP back door.

The guest for this show will be Attorney Mario Apuzzo, a battle-hardened warrior for the constitution who has been on the front lines of the “natural born Citizen” controversy for well over a decade.  The show discussion will seek definitive answers tonight on the eligibility question to serve as President and Vice President of these united States and will discuss the lack of constitutional eligibility of Senator Kamala Harris to serve in the office of Vice President of the United States.

Please tune in and listen, call in to the show to express your concerns and give your opinions. The call-in number is: 347-838-9176. You can then listen to the show or press the number 1 after your call is answered if you wish to get on the air to ask a question. Link to the show: https://www.blogtalkradio.com/drkatesrevolutionradio/2020/08/21/handling-the-truth-with-rebel-madman-tenacity

kamala-harris-fails-three-legged-stool-test-for-natural-born-citizen-5For pre-show information about Kamala Harris being a Jamaican Citizenship at Birth per the Constitution of Jamaica, Chapter 2, Section 3C,  and that she is not a “natural born Citizen” of the United States, see these links: .. http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/Kamala-Harris-Jamaican-Citizen-at-Birth.pdf … and … https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2020/07/23/u-s-senator-kamala-harris-is-not-a-natural-born-citizen-of-usa-not-eligible-to-be-president-and-cinc-or-vp/ … and … https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2020/08/10/is-kamala-harris-eligible-to-be-joe-bidens-vp-by-gary-wilmott-americanthinker/ … and … http://puzo1.blogspot.com

# # # #

CDR Charles Kerchner, P.E. (Retired)
Lehigh Valley PA USA
http://www.protectourliberty.org/
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/
http://www.scribd.com/user/52640192/protectourliberty/lists

P.S. Also read the following essays regarding the presidential eligibility term “natural born Citizen” in Article II of the U.S. Constitution:

1. A chart which lists and explains the five (5) Citizenship terms used in the U.S. Constitution.

2. Being a “born Citizen” or “Citizen at Birth” is not identically the same as a being a “natural born Citizen”.

3. The constitutional term “natural born Citizen” and basic logic, i.e., trees are plants but not all plants are trees. “Natural born Citizens” are a subset of “born Citizens (citizens at birth)”. Adjectives mean something. All “natural born Citizens” are “born Citizens (citizens at birth) but not all “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” are “natural born Citizens”: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/06/20/of-natural-born-citizens-and-citizens-at-birth-and-basic-logic-trees-are-plants-but-not-all-plants-are-trees-natural-born-citizens-nbc-are-citizens-at-birth-cab-but-not-all-cab/

4. A Euler Diagram which logically shows the kinds of U.S. Citizens and their set and subset relationships: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2018/06/16/natural-born-citizen/

5. The “Three Legged Stool Test” for being a Natural Born Citizen: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2013/11/15/the-three-legged-stool-test-analogy-for-natural-born-citizenship-of-the-united-states-to-constitutional-standards/

6. Article II Presidential Eligibility Facts: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html or https://www.scribd.com/document/161994312/Article-II-Presidential-Eligibility-Facts

7. Watch these videos (Parts I and II) by the renowned constitutional scholar Dr. Herb Titus: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esiZZ-1R7e8 and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoaZ8WextxQ

8. Read, download, and print a PDF copy of this White Paper by CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) about the “natural born Citizen” term and presidential eligibility clause in Article II of our U.S. Constitution here: http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/The-Who-What-When-Where-Why-and-How-of-NBC-Term-in-Constitution.pdf

WOBC BlogTalkRadio Returns Wednesday 19 Aug 2020 at 8 P.M. EDT

WOBC BlogTalkRadio Returns Wednesday 19 Aug 2020 at 8 P.M. EDT:
https://www.thepostemail.com/2020/08/18/wobc-radio-returns-wednesday-evening/

Direct link to the show: https://www.blogtalkradio.com/wheresobamasbirthcertificatexcom/2020/08/20/kamala-harris-is-not-eligible-to-serve-as-vice-president

If you missed the show, listen on podcast at these links:
http://d1at8ppinvdju8.cloudfront.net/1/179/show_11795435_2020_08_20_02_06_38.mp3
… or …
https://www.kerchner.com/audio/WOBC-BlogTalkRadio-19Aug2020-Kerchner-Rondeau-Booth-show_11795435_2020_08_20_02_06_38.mp3

Kamala Harris - Jamaican CitizenThe presidential eligibility clause and 12th Amendment (last line) in our U.S. Constitution is to be a strong check against persons born with foreign influence gaining control of our highest elected offices.

During the show host Mike Volin and his guests will investigate the lack of constitutional eligibility of Kamala Harris to serve in the office of Vice President of the United States.

Publisher and columnist, Sharon Rondeau from ThePostEmail.com, investigative reseachers  CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) and Miki Booth, will be our guests. The constitutional ability to hold the office of the President and Vice President under the Natural Born Citizen clause of our Constitution are under attack. It is evident over the past decades that an attack on our Constitution has been under way and continues to this day. We will provide a multitude of evidence to clearly show what the requirements are. The Natural Born Citizen clause was entered into our Constitution to protect our Country from foreign influence and invaders. Does that exist today? You better believe it does. Please tune in and listen, call in to the show to express your concerns and give your opinions. Open telephone lines.

https://www.blogtalkradio.com/wheresobamasbirthcertificatexcom/2020/08/20/kamala-harris-is-not-eligible-to-serve-as-vice-president

To call into the show dial:  516 387 1325   then press the number 1 button to get on the air

If you missed the show, listen on podcast at these links:  http://d1at8ppinvdju8.cloudfront.net/1/179/show_11795435_2020_08_20_02_06_38.mp3
… or …
https://www.kerchner.com/audio/WOBC-BlogTalkRadio-19Aug2020-Kerchner-Rondeau-Booth-show_11795435_2020_08_20_02_06_38.mp3

For pre-show education about Kamala Harris being a Jamaican Citizenship at Birth per the Constitution of Jamaica, Chapter 2, Section 3C,  and not a “natural born Citizen” of the United States, see these links: http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/Kamala-Harris-Jamaican-Citizen-at-Birth.pdf … and … https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2020/07/23/u-s-senator-kamala-harris-is-not-a-natural-born-citizen-of-usa-not-eligible-to-be-president-and-cinc-or-vp/ … and … https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2020/08/10/is-kamala-harris-eligible-to-be-joe-bidens-vp-by-gary-wilmott-americanthinker/

# # # #

CDR Charles Kerchner, P.E. (Retired)
Lehigh Valley PA USA
http://www.protectourliberty.org/
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/
http://www.scribd.com/user/52640192/protectourliberty/lists

P.S. Also read the following essays regarding the presidential eligibility term “natural born Citizen” in Article II of the U.S. Constitution:

1. A chart which lists and explains the five (5) Citizenship terms used in the U.S. Constitution.

2. Being a “born Citizen” or “Citizen at Birth” is not identically the same as a being a “natural born Citizen”.

3. The constitutional term “natural born Citizen” and basic logic, i.e., trees are plants but not all plants are trees. “Natural born Citizens” are a subset of “born Citizens (citizens at birth)”. Adjectives mean something. All “natural born Citizens” are “born Citizens (citizens at birth) but not all “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” are “natural born Citizens”: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/06/20/of-natural-born-citizens-and-citizens-at-birth-and-basic-logic-trees-are-plants-but-not-all-plants-are-trees-natural-born-citizens-nbc-are-citizens-at-birth-cab-but-not-all-cab/

4. A Euler Diagram which logically shows the kinds of U.S. Citizens and their set and subset relationships: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2018/06/16/natural-born-citizen/

5. The “Three Legged Stool Test” for being a Natural Born Citizen: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2013/11/15/the-three-legged-stool-test-analogy-for-natural-born-citizenship-of-the-united-states-to-constitutional-standards/

6. Article II Presidential Eligibility Facts: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html or https://www.scribd.com/document/161994312/Article-II-Presidential-Eligibility-Facts

7. Watch these videos (Parts I and II) by the renowned constitutional scholar Dr. Herb Titus: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esiZZ-1R7e8 and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoaZ8WextxQ

8. Read, download, and print a PDF copy of this White Paper by CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) about the “natural born Citizen” term and presidential eligibility clause in Article II of our U.S. Constitution here: http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/The-Who-What-When-Where-Why-and-How-of-NBC-Term-in-Constitution.pdf

First We Had Obots (Obama Online Bots & Trolls) – Now We Have Hbots (Harris Online Bots & Trolls) — Twenty-Five Rules of Disinformation and Gas Lighting Tactics Used by the Far Left & Its Allies in the Main Stream Media

First We Had Obots (Obama Online Bots & Trolls). Then We Had CruzBots (Ted Cruz Supporters Tried It Too ), But Were Not As Good At It As the Far Left. Now We Have the Far Left Hbots (Harris Online Bots & Trolls). But They All Use the Same Twenty-Five Rules of Disinformation and Gas Lighting to Change the Meaning of Language to Push Their Agenda — Especially to Change the Meaning of Words and Terms in Our U.S. Constitution.

Twenty-Five rules of Obot & Hbot online disinformation specialists — aka “Gas Lighting” and in more erudite propaganda-pushing marketing circles, more euphemistically known as “Perception Management”.

Source: Twenty-Five Ways To Suppress Truth:   The Rules of Disinformation  (Includes The 8 Traits of A Disinformationalist) by H. Michael Sweeney — http://www.whale.to/m/disin.html

Note: The first rule and last five (or six, depending on situation) rules are generally not directly within the ability of the traditional disinfo artist to apply. These rules are generally used more directly by those at the leadership, key players, or planning level of the criminal conspiracy or conspiracy to cover up.

1. Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil.  Regardless of what you know, don’t discuss it — especially if you are a public figure, news anchor,  etc. If it’s not reported, it didn’t happen,  and you never have to deal with the issues.
2. Become incredulous and indignant.  Avoid discussing key issues and instead focus  on side issues which can be used show the topic  as being critical of some otherwise sacrosanct group or theme. This is also known as the  ‘How dare you!’ gambit.
3. Create rumor mongers.  Avoid discussing issues by describing all charges, regardless of venue or evidence, as mere rumors and wild accusations. Other derogatory terms mutually exclusive of truth may work as well. This method which works especially well with a silent press, because the only way the public  can learn of the facts are through such ‘arguable rumors’. If you can associate the material with the Internet, use this fact to certify it a ‘wild rumor’ from a ‘bunch of kids on the Internet’ which can have no basis in fact.
4. Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent’s argument which you can easily knock down to make  yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges.  Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.
5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule.  This is also known as the primary ‘attack the messenger’  ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as ‘kooks’, ‘right-wing’, ‘liberal’, ‘left-wing’, ‘terrorists’, ‘conspiracy buffs’,  ‘radicals’, ‘militia’, ‘racists’, ‘religious fanatics’,  ‘sexual deviates’, and so forth. This makes others  shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.
6. Hit and Run. In any public forum, make a brief attack of your opponent or the opponent position and then scamper off before an answer can be fielded, or simply ignore any answer. This works extremely well in Internet  and letters-to-the-editor environments where a steady stream of new identities can be called upon without having to explain criticism, reasoning — simply make an accusation or other  attack, never discussing issues, and never answering any subsequent response, for that would dignify the opponent’s viewpoint.
7. Question motives. Twist or amplify any fact which could be taken to imply that the opponent operates out of a hidden personal  agenda or other bias. This avoids discussing issues and forces the accuser on the defensive.
8. Invoke authority. Claim for yourself or associate yourself with authority and present your argument with enough ‘jargon’ and ‘minutia’ to illustrate you are ‘one who knows’, and simply say it isn’t so without discussing issues or demonstrating concretely why or citing sources.
9. Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues except with denials they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect.
10. Associate opponent charges with old news. A derivative of the straw man — usually, in any large-scale matter of high visibility, someone will make charges early on which can be or were already easily dealt with – a kind of investment for the future should the matter not be so easily contained.) Where it can be foreseen, have your own side raise a straw man issue and have it dealt with early on as part of the initial contingency plans. Subsequent charges, regardless of validity or new ground uncovered, can usually then be associated with the original charge and dismissed as simply being a rehash without need to address current issues — so much the better where the opponent  is or was involved with the original source.
11. Establish and rely upon fall-back positions.  Using a minor matter or element of the facts, take the ‘high road’ and ‘confess’ with candor that some innocent mistake, in hindsight, was made — but that opponents have seized on the opportunity to blow it all out of proportion and imply greater criminalities which, ‘just isn’t so.’ Others can reinforce this on your behalf, later, and even publicly ‘call for an end to the nonsense’ because you have already ‘done the right thing.’ Done properly, this can garner sympathy and respect for ‘coming clean’ and ‘owning up’ to your mistakes without addressing more serious issues.
12. Enigmas have no solution.  Drawing upon the overall umbrella of events surrounding the crime and the multitude of players and events, paint the entire affair as too complex to solve. This causes those otherwise following the matter to begin to lose interest more quickly without having to address the actual issues.
13. Alice in Wonderland Logic. Avoid discussion of the issues by reasoning backwards or with an apparent deductive logic
which forbears any actual material fact.
14. Demand complete solutions. Avoid the issues by requiring opponents to solve the crime at hand completely, a ploy which works best with issues qualifying for rule 10.
15. Fit the facts to alternate conclusions.  This requires creative thinking unless the crime  was planned with contingency conclusions in place.
16. Vanish evidence and witnesses.  If it does not exist, it is not fact, and you won’t have to address the issue.
17. Change the subject. Usually in connection with one of the other ploys  listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can  ‘argue’ with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing more key issues.
18. Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you can’t do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how ‘sensitive they are to criticism.’
19. Ignore proof presented, demand impossible proofs. This is perhaps a variant of the ‘play dumb’ rule.  Regardless of what material may be presented by an opponent in public forums, claim the material irrelevant  and demand proof that is impossible for the opponent to come by (it may exist, but not be at his disposal, or it may be something which is known to be safely destroyed or withheld, such as a murder weapon.) In order to completely avoid discussing issues, it may be required that you to categorically deny and be critical of media or books as valid sources, deny that witnesses are acceptable, or even deny that statements made by government or other authorities have any meaning or relevance.
20. False evidence. Whenever possible, introduce new facts or clues designed and manufactured to conflict with opponent presentations — as useful tools to neutralize sensitive issues or impede resolution. This works best when the crime was designed
with contingencies for the purpose, and the facts cannot be easily separated from the fabrications.
21. Call a Grand Jury, Special Prosecutor, or other empowered investigative body which is in your pocket. Subvert the (process) to your benefit and effectively neutralize all sensitive issues without open discussion. Once convened, the evidence and testimony are required to be secret when properly handled. For instance, if you own the prosecuting attorney, it can insure a Grand Jury hears no useful evidence and that the evidence is sealed and unavailable to subsequent investigators. Once a favorable verdict is achieved, the matter can be considered officially closed. Usually, this technique is applied to find the guilty innocent, but it can also be used to obtain charges when seeking to frame a victim.
22. Manufacture a new truth. Create your own expert(s), group(s), author(s), leader(s) or influence existing ones willing to forge new ground via scientific, investigative, or social research or testimony which concludes favorably. In this way, if you must actually address issues, you can do so authoritatively.
23. Create bigger distractions. If the above does not seem to be working to distract from sensitive issues, or to prevent unwanted media coverage of unstoppable  events such as trials, create bigger news stories (or treat them as such) to distract the multitudes.
24. Silence critics. If the above methods do not prevail, consider removing opponents from circulation by some definitive solution so that the need to address issues is removed entirely. This can be by their death, arrest and detention, blackmail or destruction of their character by release of blackmail information, or merely by destroying them financially, emotionally, or severely damaging their health.
25. Vanish. If you are a key holder of secrets or otherwise overly illuminated and you think the heat is getting too hot, to avoid  the issues, vacate the kitchen.

Note: There are other ways to attack truth, but these listed are the most common, and others are likely derivatives of these. In the end, you can usually spot the professional disinformation players/teams by one or more of seven distinct posting traits: 1. Avoidance. They never actually discuss issues head-on or provide constructive input … ;  2. Selectivity. They tend to pick and choose opponents carefully, either applying the hit-and-run approach … ;  3. Coincidental. They tend to surface suddenly and somewhat coincidentally with a new controversial topic with no clear prior record of participation in general discussions … ;  4. Teamwork. They tend to operate in self-congratulatory and complementary packs or teams … ;  5. Anti-conspiratorial. They almost always have disdain for ‘conspiracy theorists’ [and are quick to label anyone opposed to their view as a conspiracy nut and other put-down names] … ;  6. Artificial Emotions. An odd kind of ‘artificial’ emotionalism and an unusually thick skin — an ability to persevere and persist even in the face of overwhelming criticism and unacceptance … ; and 7. Inconsistent. There is also a tendency to make mistakes which betray their true self/motives.   Click here for the full review and discussion of these frequently used disinformation traits of the far left, and the new 8th one, commonly used by Obot [and now Hbot] operative quick response teams:  http://www.whale.to/b/sweeney.html

# # # #

Click on image for an example of the Gas Lighting technique portrayed in this 1944 movie
Click on image for an example of the Gas Lighting technique portrayed in this 1944 movie

Also see Gas Lighting, another disinformation term to describe the orchestrated confusion of reality to confuse the target … which in Obama’s and the far left’s case is the American electorate … all enabled by a cowardly and complicit U.S. Congress and an enabling and complicit main stream media:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaslighting

And …  Perception Management – The Far, Far Left Obama and Now The Harris Teams are Masters of It:   https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/12/10/perception-management-the-obama-team-are-masters-of-it/

In addition, read more about Kamala Harris’ lack of constitutional eligibility to be President and Commander in Chief, or the VP, in this detailed report here:  http://www.scribd.com/lists/22182725/Some-Politicians-Seeking-High-Office-Who-Are-Not-A-Natural-Born-Citizen-of-U-S

When will we return to the rule of law and enforce the original intent, purpose, and understanding of the founders and framers for Article II Section 1 Clause 5 , the natural born Citizen clause, of our U.S. Constitution as to who is constitutionally eligible to be the President and Commander in Chief of our military?  The “natural born Citizen” clause is a “national security” clause!

CDR Charles Kerchner, P.E. (Retired)
Lehigh Valley PA USA
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/
http://www.protectourliberty.org/
http://www.scribd.com/user/52640192/protectourliberty/lists

CDR Kerchner (Ret) Will Co-Host with Mike Volin the ‘Where’s Obama’s Birth Certificate’ Radio Show

Where'sObamaBirthCertificate
Where’sObamaBirthCertificate on BlogTalkRadio

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) Will Co-Host with Mike Volin the ‘Where’s Obama’s Birth Certificate’ Radio Show Tonight, Tuesday 17 Sep 2014 (Constitution Day) at 8 p.m. ET.

The Featured Guest Will Be Paul Irey, a Typewriter and Type Font Expert. He Will Present His Evidence and Findings That Obama’s “Dream” Book, 1995 Edition, U.S. Copyright Form was Retroactively Altered and Forged to Change Obama’s Nationality and Place of Birth on Said Form.

Listen to the show live or on podcast here:  http://www.blogtalkradio.com/wheresobamasbirthcertificate/2014/09/18/paul-irey-to-discuss-another-obama-forged-document

Listen to the show on podcast here: https://s3.amazonaws.com/btr…/show/6/918/show_6918009.mp3

# # # #

Click on Image for the Evidence
Click on Image for the Evidence

Obama Short-Form Birth Certificate Released 12  Jun 2008 is a Forgery:  http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2136816/posts

Obama Long-Form Birth Certificate Released 27 Apr 2011 is a Forgery:  http://www.mcsoccp.org/joomla/index.php/14-articles/86-alabama-zullo-affidavit-final

Obama Draft Registration Card is a Back-Dated Forgery:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C6vxr7Wk7Lo

John Sampson, Retired ICE Agent, Discusses Obama Using a Stolen SSN from a Deceased Person from CT:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=clPZfjPf-Cg

Obama’s “Dream” Book, 1995 Edition, U.S. Copyright Form, was Retroactively Altered and Forged to Change Obama’s Nationality and Place of Birth on Said Form: http://www.scribd.com/doc/239648286/Proof-of-Alteration-and-Forgery-of-Obama-Dreams-Book-US-Copyright-Form-By-Type-Font-Expert-Paul-Irey

.

You Can Trust the Communists (to be Communists)
You Can Trust the Communists (to be Communists)

Hard-core Obama Obots will never see the light about Obama because their mission, campaign, and job on the internet and in the world is to obscure the light about Obama and his backers and enablers. They are hard-core ‘Communists’, ‘communists’, and/or ‘Fellow Traveler’ ideologues who are enemies of our U.S. Constitution and Constitutional Republic. They wish to destroy our way of life, our economy, and our military power. They often dupe and use liberal sympathizers who in turn dupe others. The hard-core ones in the USA are the Saul Alinsky (and in some cases Russian and Chinese Communist) trained and believing disrupters. The end (the Socialist Utopian Dream they hold out as the goal in their deceiving rhetoric, but what really turns out to be a totally controlled state and Leninist/Stalinist tyranny and serfdom) justifies in their minds any means (illegal, unethical, disinformation, lying, immoral, or demented) to gain power. Their long-term strategy was to infiltrate our institutions and take over from within.

.

.

Updated Version -- You Can Still Trust the Communists to Be Communists
Updated Version — You Can Still Trust the Communists to Be Communists

They have infiltrated all our institutions – government, civilian, national media, national church leadership, foundations, non-profits, and even the military. Much of this is done using fronts and lying to cover the front organization’s true agenda. The end justifies the means.  Nothing is beyond the pale to them. World history shows that. The history of the battle to expose Obama for the fraud he is shows that. Read the small booklet from several decades ago if you wish to understand the Communist/communist/fellow traveler ideologues, who troll the internet today known as Obots … defending the indefensible … Obama’s forged ID documents: “You Can Trust the Communists (to be Communists)” by Dr. Fred Schwarz. See more about this book here: http://www.amazon.com/

Obama the Enigma: Click on the image to learn more about Obama he does not want you to know.
Obama the Enigma: Click on the image to learn more about Obama he does not want you to know.

A warning from the past — some conspiracies are very real and are also large and well organized and in process for a long time.  Such is the nature of Communist activities in the USA.  The target of the seditious political conspiracy we are currently faced with is to destroy our U.S. Constitution, our Republic, our culture, and our military.  Remember this quote from history: “We must now face the harsh truth that the objectives of communism are being steadily advanced because many of us do not recognize the means used to advance them. … The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a Conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists. The American mind simply has not come to a realization of the evil which has been introduced into our midst.” Quote by: J. Edgar Hoover former FBI director. Source: Elks Magazine (August 1956).

When will we return to the rule of law and enforce our identity theft protection laws and the U.S. Constitution in regards to Obama, the Usurper and Fraud-in-Chief residing in the White House? When will Congress take action!?

CDR Charles Kerchner, P.E. (Retired)
Lehigh Valley PA USA
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/
http://www.protectourliberty.org/
http://www.scribd.com/protectourliberty/collections/

“The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the veil of indifference to their necessity to continually be “on watch” and at times to stand up and protect our U.S. Constitution from usurpation by progressive/marxist/radical politicians operating in relative secrecy protected by an enabling press and major media … thinking and saying it’s the job of someone else … and living their lives in general apathy about what the national government is up to, they will allow the adoption of every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation without knowing how it happened.” CDR Kerchner (Ret)’s alert and paraphrasing earlier warnings about the socialist/progressives’ long-term stealth agenda to transform the USA from a constitutional republic into a top-down, central controlled, socialist form of government.

P.S.  Obama is NOT a “natural born Citizen of the United States” to U.S. Constitutional standards. Read this essay regarding the legal term of art “natural born Citizen” and basic logic, i.e., trees are plants but not all plants are trees. Natural born Citizens are a subset of “born Citizens (citizens at birth)”.  All “natural born Citizens” are “born Citizens (citizens at birth) but not all “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” are “natural born Citizens”:  https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/06/20/of-natural-born-citizens-and-citizens-at-birth-and-basic-logic-trees-are-plants-but-not-all-plants-are-trees-natural-born-citizens-nbc-are-citizens-at-birth-cab-but-not-all-cab/   Also read the “Three Legged Stool Test” for Natural Born Citizen https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2013/11/15/the-three-legged-stool-test-analogy-for-natural-born-citizenship-of-the-united-states-to-constitutional-standards/ … AND … http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html  Also watch this video by the renowned constitutional scholar Dr. Herb Titus: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esiZZ-1R7e8