How Close were the FBI and Perkins Coie when the Obama “Birth Certificate” was Released?

How Close were the FBI and Perkins Coie when the Obama “Birth Certificate” was Released? | by Sharon Rondeau | @

(Jun. 3, 2022) — Toward the end of Tuesday’s edition of Fox News Channel’s “Tucker Carlson Tonight,” Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL1) told host Tucker Carlson that a “whistleblower” informed him that for at least a decade, the FBI has maintained a “working space” within the Washington, DC office of the international law firm Perkins Coie.

Not only did the FBI have its “working space” at the firm, Gaetz said, but the arrangement was also “operated” by then-Perkins Coie attorney Michael Sussmann, who earlier Tuesday was acquitted by a Washington, DC jury on one count of lying to the FBI.

Sussmann’s indictment accused him of lying about his motive for requesting a meeting in September 2016 with then-FBI General Counsel James Baker and specifically, whether or not Sussmann represented a client.

According to Baker’s testimony in last week’s trial, during the meeting Sussmann told Baker he did not represent a client in the matter and had requested the meeting only to “help the Bureau.”

Prosecution exhibits released during the course of the trial allegedly show that Perkins Coie billed the Clinton campaign for the time involved in Sussmann’s meeting with Baker.

In its May 24 coverage of the trial, The New York Post reported that as it pertained to the origins of the FBI’s investigation into the 2016 Trump campaign stemming from Sussmann’s meeting with Baker and the now-infamous Steele “dossier,” Sussmann’s identity was placed on a “close hold,” meaning it was not revealed.

Perkins Coie has long represented Democrats in one of its specialty areas,political law.” Former Perkins Coie attorney Marc Elias, who last year launched his own “mission”-driven firm with several other Perkins Coie colleagues, served as counsel to Organizing for America (OFA), Barack Obama’s political organization. OFA later became a non-profit, “Organizing for Action,” but is now merged with the National Democratic Redistricting Committee (NDRC). …

Continue reading the article at:

# # # #

For more information about Obama’s forged birth documents (there are two of them) read these articles:

Obama’s short form and long form birth documents are both forgeries
Obama Forged Long Form Birth Certificate
Click on Images for Details about Obama’s Forged Birth Certificate and Selective Service (Draft) Registration Form

CDR Charles Kerchner, P.E. (Retired)
Lehigh Valley PA USA

Voter Integrity Group Finds Nearly Half of Georgia Counties Cannot Produce Ballot Images from 2020 Election

Voter Integrity Group Finds Nearly Half of Georgia Counties Cannot Produce Ballot Images from 2020 Election| by Sharon Rondeau

(Nov. 10, 2021) — On Tuesday the co-founder of Georgia-based voter-integrity organization, Garland Favorito, gave a press conference during which he reported that nearly half of all counties in the state were unable or unwilling to produce ballot images from the November 3, 2020 election required by law to be maintained for a minimum of 22 months.

The discovery came about when volunteers submitted open records requests for the images and received various responses or non-responses from 74 out of 159 counties, Favorito said. ….

Read rest of the article here.

Breaking News: National Archives Has “Harmful Language” Warning on Page Showing U.S. Constitution

Does the National Archives Believe the Constitution Contains “Harmful Language?” | by Sharon Rondeau @

Image source: Red arrow added by Editor pointing to the warning message. Image captured at 9:34 p.m. east coast time on 8 Sep 2021.

# # # #

My comment: So NARA now considers historical documents, including the U.S. Constitution, to be potential harmful speech and thus is discouraging people from reading them with that warning tag. It’s just one more example of the progressive far-left rapidly speeding up its agenda to re-write history, change language and the meaning of words, undermine our traditional family structure and culture, and purge history per the teachings of Antonio Gramsci and others (as exemplified in the novel “1984”) in the last 100+ years in order to undermine and bring down the USA.

Regarding why they work to change and re-define history, remember the quote “”Who controls the past controls the future: who controls the present controls the past” from the novel “1984”. That is why the progressive Marxist want to re-write history, so they can control the future. And with Marxists that means total totalitarian control. To them Socialism is only a temporary railroad stop on the train to totalitarian Communism with the elitist progressives in charge and controlling every aspect of your life.

See this excellent new, short, must-read, easy to read book that discusses a dozen or so of the political philosophers and communists past and present (including Obama and Soros) who are behind all this directly, or indirectly via their progressive disciples: “Who Was Karl Marx?: The Men, the Motives and the Menace Behind Today’s Rampaging American Left” —

This book is a must read if you want to understand where all the plans, ideas, tactics, and strategy of the far-left came from. What is happening now is not by accident. This book clearly shows that. See my review of this important new book at the link below. Get a copy, read it, and share it with friends and associates:

Read the article about NARA’s new warning tag on the founding era documents here:

CDR Charles Kerchner, P.E. (Retired)
Lehigh Valley PA USA

Are the Electoral College’s Votes Valid? Part II

Are the Electoral College’s Votes Valid? Part II | by Sharon Rondeau | @

(Dec. 26, 2020) — Continuing from Part I of our interview with Atty. Mario Apuzzo on the role of Congress in determining who the next president will be, in this section Apuzzo explained that not only can Congress accept or reject the electoral votes cast for presidential and vice-presidential candidates on the basis of their validity under the 12th Amendment and Electoral Count Act (ECA) of 1877, but its members also have the responsibility under the 20th Amendment to ascertain whether or not all candidates qualify for the offices they seek.

On Sunday, in conjunction with the U.S. Allegiance Institute (USAI), Apuzzo released a letter and amicus curiae brief which members of the public can download, sign and send to their members of Congress urging that on January 6, when the two chambers of Congress meet in joint session for the counting of the electoral votes, all candidates be scrutinized for eligibility as well as whether or not the Electoral College vote count was “regularly given,” in accordance with the ECA.

On the night of November 3, Trump was winning in all six “swing” states of Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, only to be declared the loser in all as vote counts continued past November 3 and the media announced Biden the “projected winner” of more than the 270 electoral votes required to win on November 7.

Some in the media had oddly predicted that Trump would appear to be winning on November 3 and claim victory “before all the votes are counted.” For months prior to the election, media outlets speculated, quoting Democrat politicians, that Trump will “refuse to leave office” in the event of a Biden win.

“A large percentage of Americans do not think we had a legitimate election,” the USAI/Apuzzo letter to Congress reads on page 3. “While the immediate seizure of evidence and appointment by a Special Counsel, and a Congressional investigation following the election is necessary, you have enough evidence to now reject the electoral college votes of the offending battleground states, Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin.”

During the first part of our interview, Apuzzo focused on the ECA, which he explained amended the 12th Amendment, which he in turn pointed out amended Article II of the U.S. Constitution dealing with how the president is elected. All electoral votes must be considered “regularly given” to be accepted by Congress, Apuzzo said, quoting the statute. “If the popular vote is not valid, then those electors didn’t receive votes that were regularly cast. So that’s the key: Congress is not bound by the Electoral Vote Act because it assumes that the votes were regularly cast.”

Article II, Section 1, clauses 1-3 of the “original” Constitution states:

… continue reading part II at:

# # # #

CDR Charles Kerchner, P.E. (Retired)
Lehigh Valley PA USA

%d bloggers like this: