Rafael “TED” Cruz’s eligibility – The whole sordid affair | @ Running2016.com

Canadian-born Ted Cruz and Cuban Citizen at Birth via his Cuban father is NOT constitutional eligible to be President and CINC, or VP
Canadian-born Ted Cruz and Cuban Citizen at Birth via his Cuban father is NOT constitutional eligible to be President and CINC, or VP. Click Image for details.

Canadian Rafael “TED” Cruz’s eligibility – The whole sordid affair  | @ Running2016.comh/t to Gary Wilmott

Per this article Ted’s mom at some point in time became a British Subject and then later a Canadian Citizen. Ted Cruz may have been born with NO U.S. Citizenship of any kind since his mother may have become a Canadian Citizen after living in Canada for only one year using a fast-track for British Subjects, which it is alleged Ted’s mom was at one point as a result of her marriage and move to England and living there for several years. She could have so declared herself to still be a British Subject once she moved to Canada. The old once a Brit always a Brit factors could have been in play too. She may have only told Canadian authorities some but not all of her life narrative and citizenship status facts up to that point in time after moving to Canada. She may have claimed she was still a British Subject.  Read this excerpt from the Running2016.com article. Then read the whole article.

” …  The newly hired Eleanor and Rafael started working together as mathematicians for the New Orleans oil company in 1967, and with both being from Texas, alone in an exciting city, it didn’t take long for them to become involved, even though they were both married to other people. Within months they were scheming to make their new found love permanent. A real life Desi and Lucy. The problem was that they were both still married to other people and neither was a US citizen. Eleanor was now British and there was a record of her US marriage to Alan but no record of a US divorce, and the only reason Rafael was still in the US was because he was married to a US citizen, if he divorced his wife Julia and she turned him in then he would be deported. It is highly questionable why he never filed to become a US citizen during these 8 years of marriage.

As mathematicians in their jobs they analyzed geographical seismic data from areas where various oil companies were searching for oil. One of the areas that the company was getting a lot of business from was the Calgary Canada fields and as the analysts assigned to the project, they found their answer. By moving to Canada there would be no record of any previous marriages or divorce, no need to worry about Rafael getting a divorce and being deported. The best part of this plan was that according to the Canadian Citizen Act of 1947, as a British subject Eleanor was entitled to Canadian Citizenship after living there one year. Then marrying Rafael in Canada would make him a Canadian citizen after one year too. It seemed like the perfect plan so within 6 months of starting their new jobs and meeting each other, they quit and headed to Calgary together, telling family and friends that ‘work’ was sending them there.  (Rafael’s move to Canada should have also generated an A-File entry.)

Among the changes introduced by the Canadian Citizen Act of 1947 were the following:  …  “

Continue reading the 2016Running.com article at this link:  http://running2016.com/html/canadian_ted.html

Another thought: In reading this and looking at the time frame that Cruz’s dad and mom moved to Canada, I have wondered at times if part of the motivation for their move to Canada in the late 1960’s was to avoid daddy Cruz being drafted into the U.S. Army during the very hot and active Vietnam War at that time.  Many legally resident aliens and U.S. citizens left for Canada during that time frame to avoid being drafted.  I wonder what Mr. Cruz’s draft draft system lottery number was in the year they left for Canada … a low number  (meaning very likely to be drafted in that year) or a high one (low chance of being drafted that year)?  Or did they leave in anticipation of a larger draft coming?  What exact date did they move to Canada? What exact date were the first lottery numbers drawn?

# # # #

Read the: The Who What When Where Why and How of the “natural born Citizen” Term in Our U.S. Constitution

cruzandrubionoteligiblepetitionsbanner(596x130) Cruz and Rubio were Citizens at Birth of a Foreign Country (Ted of 2 Foreign Countries) – Both NOT a “natural born Citizen” of the United States

Get PDF Copy of Ted Cruz Foreign Citizenship Facts Petition Here — Get PDF Copy of Marco Rubio Foreign Citizenship Facts Petition Here – Neither is constitutionally eligible to serve as President and Commander in Chief or Vice President!

A Simple Euler Logic Diagram Shows Logical Relationship of “natural born Citizens” to Other Type “Citizens” of the United States. Only a “natural born Citizen” Can Constitutionally be the President and Commander in Chief or the Vice-President. Click on Image For More Information.

More historical and legal papers and analysis on the true constitutional meaning and intent of the founders and framers of the presidential eligibility clause, natural born Citizen, in our U.S. Constitution can be found at this link: http://www.scribd.com/collections/3301209/

CDR Charles Kerchner (Retired)
Lehigh Valley PA USA
http://www.protectourliberty.org/
http://www.scribd.com/protectourliberty/collections/
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/

P.S. Also read this essay regarding the constitutional term in the presidential eligibility clause “natural born Citizen” and basic logic, i.e., trees are plants but not all plants are trees. Natural born Citizens are a subset of “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” but not all “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” are “natural born Citizens”: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/06/20/of-natural-born-citizens-and-citizens-at-birth-and-basic-logic-trees-are-plants-but-not-all-plants-are-trees-natural-born-citizens-nbc-are-citizens-at-birth-cab-but-not-all-cab/ … AND … http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html Also watch this video by the renowned constitutional scholar Dr. Herb Titus — Part I: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esiZZ-1R7e8 and Part II: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoaZ8WextxQ

ProtectOurLiberty WebsiteSpaceMy BlogSpaceDocs Collections Re Obama SpaceMy YouTube SpaceMost Recent Full Pg Ad SpaceAd Archives SpaceFliers/Handouts SpaceBlock Ads SpaceSheriff to Sheriffs – Sheriff Kit Project SpaceGet A Sheriff Kit SpaceInterviews-Audio/Print SpaceBooks SpaceGoat’s Ledge SpaceContact Me

Breaking News: Constitutional Article II Expert Attorney Mario Apuzzo will Represent Objector Fernando Powers at NJ Ted Cruz Eligibility Hearing

Click on flag to link to Attorney Apuzzo's blog
Click on flag to link to Attorney Apuzzo’s blog for his writings about the constitutional term “natural born Citizen”
Click image to learn more about Atty Mario Apuzzo
Click image to learn more about Atty Mario Apuzzo

Breaking News:  Constitutional Article II Expert Attorney Mario Apuzzo will Represent Objector Fernando Powers at  Canadian-Born Ted Cruz NJ Eligibility Hearing to be Held on Monday, 11 Apr 2016, at 9:00 a.m. EDT in Mercerville NJ.

For those wishing to attend the ballot hearing on Monday morning, the location is:

Office Of Administrative Law
3444 Quakerbridge Road
Quakerbridge Plaza-Bldg.9
Mercerville (Hamilton Twp.), NJ 08619

Visit Atty Mario Apuzzo’s blog to learn more about his legal essays and writings on “natural born Citizen” to constitutional standards: http://puzo1.blogspot.com

Fernando Powers, Atty Mario Apuzzo’s client in NJ in the ballot access challenge to Ted Cruz, ran for Congress in 2010.  For more about him google on “Fernando Powers for Congress”.  Here are some sample search results:  “Fernando Powers For Congress – Truck Drivers” — https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QU_EZSXeUqE   and  “Fernando Powers For Congress 2010 – A Marine and Gulf War Veteran” — https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLhbc2pP_nk

Update 1 – 11 Apr 2016:  News re NJ hearing challenging constitutional eligibility of Ted Cruz:  http://www.philly.com/philly/news/politics/20160412_N_J__judge_hears_challenges_to_Cruz_eligibility.html

Update 2 – 11 Apr 2016: Exclusive: Atty. Mario Apuzzo on New Jersey Ballot Challenge Hearing:  http://www.thepostemail.com/2016/04/11/exclusive-atty-mario-apuzzo-on-new-jersey-ballot-challenge-hearing/

Update 3 – 12 Apr 2016: Saw this in NJ news about the decision being in and for Cruz
http://www.northjersey.com/news/judge-ted-cruz-eligible-to-be-on-n-j-primary-ballot-1.1543279

Update 4 – 12 Apr 2016: Get copy of the judge’s “reasoning” for his decision here: https://www.scribd.com/doc/308269472/NJ-Judge-Advisory-Opinion-Rules-Canadian-Born-Cruz-Eligible-To-Be-President-4-12-2016

# # # #

Read the: The Who What When Where Why and How of the “natural born Citizen” Term in Our U.S. Constitution

cruzandrubionoteligiblepetitionsbanner(596x130)
Cruz and Rubio were Citizens at Birth of a Foreign Country (Ted of 2 Foreign Countries) – Both NOT a “natural born Citizen” of the United States

Get PDF Copy of Ted Cruz Foreign Citizenship Facts Petition Here — Get PDF Copy of Marco Rubio Foreign Citizenship Facts Petition Here – Neither is constitutionally eligible to serve as President and Commander in Chief or Vice President!

A Simple Euler Logic Diagram Shows Logical Relationship of “natural born Citizens” to Other Type “Citizens” of the United States. Only a “natural born Citizen” Can Constitutionally be the President and Commander in Chief or the Vice-President. Click on Image For More Information.

More historical and legal papers and analysis on the true constitutional meaning and intent of the founders and framers of the presidential eligibility clause, natural born Citizen, in our U.S. Constitution can be found at this link: http://www.scribd.com/collections/3301209/

CDR Charles Kerchner (Retired)
Lehigh Valley PA USA
http://www.protectourliberty.org/
http://www.scribd.com/protectourliberty/collections/
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/

P.S. Also read this essay regarding the constitutional term in the presidential eligibility clause “natural born Citizen” and basic logic, i.e., trees are plants but not all plants are trees. Natural born Citizens are a subset of “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” but not all “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” are “natural born Citizens”: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/06/20/of-natural-born-citizens-and-citizens-at-birth-and-basic-logic-trees-are-plants-but-not-all-plants-are-trees-natural-born-citizens-nbc-are-citizens-at-birth-cab-but-not-all-cab/ … AND … http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html Also watch this video by the renowned constitutional scholar Dr. Herb Titus — Part I: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esiZZ-1R7e8 and Part II: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoaZ8WextxQ

ProtectOurLiberty WebsiteSpaceMy BlogSpaceDocs Collections Re Obama SpaceMy YouTube SpaceMost Recent Full Pg Ad SpaceAd Archives SpaceFliers/Handouts SpaceBlock Ads SpaceSheriff to Sheriffs – Sheriff Kit Project SpaceGet A Sheriff Kit SpaceInterviews-Audio/Print SpaceBooks SpaceGoat’s Ledge SpaceContact Me

Breaking News: Constitutionally Ineligible Foreign-Born Ted Cruz Ballot Access Challenged in NJ

Constitutionally Ineligible Foreign-Born Ted Cruz Ballot Access Challenged in NJ

Ted Cruz is NOT a “natural born Citizen” of the United States. Challenge Filed by Law Professor and Attorney Victor Williams, a Republican Candidate for President.

Click on flag to link to Attorney Apuzzo's blog
Click on flag to link to announcement

See and get a copy of the announcement here:  https://www.scribd.com/doc/307496597/Victor-Williams-Ballot-Access-Challenge-to-Ineligible-Foreign-Born-Ted-Cruz-in-NJ-Apr2016

Update 1 – 09 Apr 2016: Exclusive: Write-In Republican Presidential Candidate Files Ballot Challenges Against “Ted ‘Canadian’ Cruz,” Hearing on Monday Morning 9:00 a.m. 11 Apr 2016 in New Jersey | The Post & Email: http://www.thepostemail.com/2016/04/09/exclusive-write-in-republican-presidential-candidate-files-ballot-challenges-against-ted-canadian-cruz-hearing-on-monday-morning-in-new-jersey/

Update 2 – 10 Apr 2016: An excellent interview of Professor Victor Williams about his ballot access challenges in nine states to the ineligible Canadian-born Ted Cruz:  http://www.thepostemail.com/2016/04/10/gop-presidential-candidate-challenges-cruzs-eligibility-in-nine-states/

Update 3 – 10 Apr 2016: A second objector, Mr. Fernando Powers, is objecting to Ted Cruz’s constitutional eligibility and has retained legal counsel, Atty Mario Apuzzo, to oppose Ted Cruz’s name being placed on the NJ ballot for President:  https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2016/04/10/breaking-news-constitutional-article-ii-expert-and-atty-mario-apuzzo-will-represent-objector-fernando-powers-at-nj-ted-cruz-eligibility-hearing/

Update 4 – 11 Apr 2016:  Update 11 Apr 2016:  News re NJ hearing challenging constitutional eligibility of Ted Cruz:  http://www.philly.com/philly/news/politics/20160412_N_J__judge_hears_challenges_to_Cruz_eligibility.html and also … Early news reports by AP from NJ hearing re Canadian-Born and ineligible Ted Cruz: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/politics-government/national-politics/article71146857.html

Update 5 – 11 Apr 2016: Exclusive: Atty. Mario Apuzzo on New Jersey Ballot Challenge Hearing:  http://www.thepostemail.com/2016/04/11/exclusive-atty-mario-apuzzo-on-new-jersey-ballot-challenge-hearing/

Update 6 – 12 Apr 2016: Saw this in NJ news about the decision being in and for Cruz
http://www.northjersey.com/news/judge-ted-cruz-eligible-to-be-on-n-j-primary-ballot-1.1543279

Update 7 – 12 Apr 2016: Get copy of the judge’s “reasoning” for his decision here: https://www.scribd.com/doc/308269472/NJ-Judge-Advisory-Opinion-Rules-Canadian-Born-Cruz-Eligible-To-Be-President-4-12-2016

Update 8 – 14 Apr 2016: Objector Victor Williams sends final request to NJ Governor Chris Christie for Admin Review re Foreign-Born Ted Cruz Constitutional Ineligibility and to keep ineligible Ted Cruz off the NJ ballot for President https://www.scribd.com/doc/308882350/Objector-Victor-Williams-Sends-Final-Request-to-NJ-Gov-Christie-for-Admin-Review-re-Foreign-Born-Ted-Cruz-Constitutional-Ineligibility

# # # #

Read the: The Who What When Where Why and How of the “natural born Citizen” Term in Our U.S. Constitution

cruzandrubionoteligiblepetitionsbanner(596x130)
Cruz and Rubio were Citizens at Birth of a Foreign Country (Ted of 2 Foreign Countries) – Both NOT a “natural born Citizen” of the United States

Get PDF Copy of Ted Cruz Foreign Citizenship Facts Petition Here — Get PDF Copy of Marco Rubio Foreign Citizenship Facts Petition Here – Neither is constitutionally eligible to serve as President and Commander in Chief or Vice President!

A Simple Euler Logic Diagram Shows Logical Relationship of “natural born Citizens” to Other Type “Citizens” of the United States. Only a “natural born Citizen” Can Constitutionally be the President and Commander in Chief or the Vice-President. Click on Image For More Information.

More historical and legal papers and analysis on the true constitutional meaning and intent of the founders and framers of the presidential eligibility clause, natural born Citizen, in our U.S. Constitution can be found at this link: http://www.scribd.com/collections/3301209/

CDR Charles Kerchner (Retired)
Lehigh Valley PA USA
http://www.protectourliberty.org/
http://www.scribd.com/protectourliberty/collections/
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/

P.S. Also read this essay regarding the constitutional term in the presidential eligibility clause “natural born Citizen” and basic logic, i.e., trees are plants but not all plants are trees. Natural born Citizens are a subset of “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” but not all “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” are “natural born Citizens”: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/06/20/of-natural-born-citizens-and-citizens-at-birth-and-basic-logic-trees-are-plants-but-not-all-plants-are-trees-natural-born-citizens-nbc-are-citizens-at-birth-cab-but-not-all-cab/ … AND … http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html Also watch this video by the renowned constitutional scholar Dr. Herb Titus — Part I: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esiZZ-1R7e8 and Part II: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoaZ8WextxQ

ProtectOurLiberty WebsiteSpaceMy BlogSpaceDocs Collections Re Obama SpaceMy YouTube SpaceMost Recent Full Pg Ad SpaceAd Archives SpaceFliers/Handouts SpaceBlock Ads SpaceSheriff to Sheriffs – Sheriff Kit Project SpaceGet A Sheriff Kit SpaceInterviews-Audio/Print SpaceBooks SpaceGoat’s Ledge SpaceContact Me

Breaking News: Carmon Elliott of Pittsburgh PA to File Petition to U.S. Supreme Court to Overturn the Recent PA Court Decision re Ted Cruz

Breaking News:  Carmon Elliott of Pittsburgh PA of Elliott v Cruz Ballot Access Challenge in PA to File Petition to U.S. Supreme Court

Click on the image for more on the issues
Click on the image for more on the issues
Carmon Elliott per GoFundMe Campaign
Carmon Elliott of the Elliott v Cruz PA Ballot Access Challenge and Lawsuit

Seeks to Overturn the Recent PA Court Decisions to Leave the Constitutionally Ineligible Foreign-Born Ted Cruz on the Ballot in the PA Primary – Launches GoFundMe.com Campaign to Raise Funds to Cover the Costs of Filing to SCOTUS

For more information on the Elliott v Cruz going to SCOTUS fund raising campaign see this link: https://www.gofundme.com/h3xff4m4

Please visit his fund raising campaign site linked to above and make a donation, large or small.  Please help Mr. Elliott to support and defend our U.S. Constitution and to expose the poser Ted Cruz who is NOT a “natural born Citizen” of the United States and is NOT constitutionally eligible to be the President and Commander in Chief, or the VP.

UPDATE — Exclusive: The Post & Email Interviews Pennsylvania Eligibility Challenger on Cruz Ballot Objection | The Post & Email
http://www.thepostemail.com/2016/04/01/exclusive-the-post-email-interviews-pennsylvania-eligibility-challenger-on-cruz-ballot-objection/

# # # #

Read the: The Who What When Where Why and How of the “natural born Citizen” Term in Our U.S. Constitution

cruzandrubionoteligiblepetitionsbanner(596x130)
Cruz and Rubio were Citizens at Birth of a Foreign Country (Ted of 2 Foreign Countries) – Both NOT a “natural born Citizen” of the United States

Get PDF Copy of Ted Cruz Foreign Citizenship Facts Petition Here — Get PDF Copy of Marco Rubio Foreign Citizenship Facts Petition Here – Neither is constitutionally eligible to serve as President and Commander in Chief or Vice President!

The Presidential Eligibility Clause in the U.S. Constitution is a National Security Clause since the President is also the Commander in Chief of Our Military.   The Supreme Court and/or Congress Must Act so as Not to Repeat Once Again Having a Constitutionally Ineligible Person Permitted to be Elected into the Oval Office – Now Or in the Future.  CDR Kerchner (Ret) – ProtectOurLiberty.org

CDR Charles Kerchner (Retired)
Lehigh Valley PA USA
http://www.protectourliberty.org/
http://www.scribd.com/protectourliberty/collections/
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/

 

Disgraceful Unconstitutional Ruling: PA Supreme Court Affirms Lower Court – Leaves Ineligible Ted Cruz on PA Ballot

Disgraceful Unconstitutional Ruling: With a One Sentence Judgment with No Explanation, the PA Supreme Court Affirms Lower Court’s Deeply Flawed Decision – Leaves Foreign Born and Constitutionally Ineligible Ted Cruz on PA Ballot

Read the initial news coverage about the court decision here:  http://www.post-gazette.com/news/politics-state/2016/03/31/State-Supreme-Court-rules-with-lower-court-in-allowing-Cruz-to-appear-on-Pa-primary-ballot/stories/201603310239

My comments:  The PA Supreme Court Justices have with this ruling simply and totally ignored their Oath of Office to support and defend the U.S. Constitution and continue to permit a foreign born, constitutionally ineligible candidate Ted Cruz to remain on the ballot for the PA Primary.

The lower court ruling was deeply flawed and based on non-legal sources (an online Harvard Law Review forum article written by political party connected attorneys), misrepresentations of existing and past naturalization laws, and even using Ted Cruz’s argument in citing a totally repealed hastily prepared error-ridden first attempt at a naturalization law adopted by the 1st Congress in 1790 that was repealed and corrected via a 1795 naturalization law under the leadership of the key author of our U.S. Constitution, James Madison. How in the world can a judge today logically and soundly point to an erroneous and totally repealed error containing 1790 naturalization act (as argued by James Madison in the 3rd Congress that said 1790 act was flawed and must be repealed and replaced) to justify that he today is a “natural born Citizen” to constitutional standards per the founders and framers originalist understanding and intent, along with also misreading and misinterpreting what the flawed 1790 naturalization act actually determined and said? That judge’s decision is judicial absurdity and was only made using politically tainted progressive reasoning and not a sound legal decision based on the originalism facts presented by Mr. Elliott and his attorneys.

Being born in the USA is an absolutely necessary part of being a “natural born Citizen”. Ted Cruz admits and stipulated he was not born in the USA.  The lower court decision should have been reversed. The briefs by the appellant and friends of the court filings were very clear on the law and precedence and how deeply flawed the lower court’s decision was and how deceptive Ted Cruz’s arguments to the lower court were.

Ted Cruz is at best a “naturalized” Citizen at birth asserting his claim to basic U.S. citizenship only via by statutorily enacted “naturalization” law enacted during the recent progressive period of U.S. history which now allows basic statutory naturalized at birth citizenship to be passed to a foreign born child who has a U.S. born mother, that is … a status of only having a citizen mother and not having a citizen father and being born outside the USA.

Under the common law of the USA when the founders and framers wrote the U.S. Constitution, they would have never allowed Cruz to ever be considered a citizen of the United States at birth whatsoever, let alone to constitutional standards as to who could be the President and Commander in Chief of our military. I say “at best” because it has not yet been proven that his mother acted properly to register her foreign born child per the statutory requirements in effect when Ted was born in Canada.  Ted Cruz has not produced or shown to the public any extant Consular Report of Foreign Birth that should have been filed in Canada at a U.S. Consular office soon after Ted was born.

Ted was born in Canada to a Cuban national father. Ted is missing two legs of the three legs needed to be a “natural born Citizen” at birth. Ted was born with citizenship and allegiance to three countries. Ted Cruz is NOT a “natural born” Citizen at birth via Natural Law or to constitutional standards or per prior U.S. Supreme Court rulings re foreign born persons. He was NOT born with sole allegiance and unity of citizenship to the USA and only the USA.

This decision by the appeals court imo was more based on their political eyes and ears, a progressive agenda to weaken the natural born Citizen term, and/or having moist fingers in the winds of national politics (and thus they punted showing cowardice imo) by failing to rule objectively on the merits, i.e., that Ted Cruz is at most and at best a “naturalized” Citizen of the USA, per what was presented in the appeal filings and lower court filings by the appellant re the relevant precedent U.S. naturalization laws and U.S. Supreme Court decisions and/or the originalism understanding, meaning, and intent of the “natural born Citizen” term in the presidential eligibility clause in our U.S. Constitution.

In the one sentence ruling they issued, the PA Supreme Court showed the world that they were totally ducking the issue and punted via their simply “affirming” the deeply flawed lower court decision and not holding oral arguments and seriously addressing in open court the misrepresentations of law of Ted Cruz and the clear-cut merits presented in the various appeal briefs and Memorandum of Law and briefs to the lower courts demonstrating that Ted Cruz is at best a “naturalized” born Citizen via positive man-made statutory “naturalization” law and is definitely NOT a “natural” born Citizen per “natural” law and to constitutional standards. — CDR Kerchner (Ret)

Read the: The Who What When Where Why and How of the “natural born Citizen” Term in Our U.S. Constitution

cruzandrubionoteligiblepetitionsbanner(596x130)
Cruz and Rubio were Citizens at Birth of a Foreign Country (Ted of 2 Foreign Countries) – Both NOT a “natural born Citizen” of the United States

Get PDF Copy of Ted Cruz Foreign Citizenship Facts Petition Here — Get PDF Copy of Marco Rubio Foreign Citizenship Facts Petition Here – Neither is constitutionally eligible to serve as President and Commander in Chief or Vice President!

A Simple Euler Logic Diagram Shows Logical Relationship of “natural born Citizens” to Other Type “Citizens” of the United States. Only a “natural born Citizen” Can Constitutionally be the President and Commander in Chief or the Vice-President. Click on Image For More Information.

More historical and legal papers and analysis on the true constitutional meaning and intent of the founders and framers of the presidential eligibility clause, natural born Citizen, in our U.S. Constitution can be found at this link: http://www.scribd.com/collections/3301209/

CDR Charles Kerchner (Retired)
Lehigh Valley PA USA
http://www.protectourliberty.org/
http://www.scribd.com/protectourliberty/collections/
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/

P.S. Also read this essay regarding the constitutional term in the presidential eligibility clause “natural born Citizen” and basic logic, i.e., trees are plants but not all plants are trees. Natural born Citizens are a subset of “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” but not all “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” are “natural born Citizens”: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/06/20/of-natural-born-citizens-and-citizens-at-birth-and-basic-logic-trees-are-plants-but-not-all-plants-are-trees-natural-born-citizens-nbc-are-citizens-at-birth-cab-but-not-all-cab/ … AND … http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html Also watch this video by the renowned constitutional scholar Dr. Herb Titus — Part I: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esiZZ-1R7e8 and Part II: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoaZ8WextxQ

ProtectOurLiberty WebsiteSpaceMy BlogSpaceDocs Collections Re Obama SpaceMy YouTube SpaceMost Recent Full Pg Ad SpaceAd Archives SpaceFliers/Handouts SpaceBlock Ads SpaceSheriff to Sheriffs – Sheriff Kit Project SpaceGet A Sheriff Kit SpaceInterviews-Audio/Print SpaceBooks SpaceGoat’s Ledge SpaceContact Me