CDR Kerchner (Ret)'s Blog

February 3, 2016

Media Continues Trying to Black Out COGENT Discussions About “natural born Citizenship”

Media Continues Trying to Black Out COGENT Discussions About “natural born Citizenship”

IGNORANCE IS BLISS!  by Gary Wilmott

” Talk Show host invites calls and then goes into full blackout mode when caller tries to explain why Ted Cruz is ineligible to be POTUS.

While the media blackout continues over the largest story in American history, the ongoing investigation into Barack Hussein Obama’s fraudulent birth certificate as well as his Selective Service registration, both of which it have been deemed forgeries by the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Investigation, it continues to be business as usual with the talking heads in the media who wish to perpetuate the deceit and fraud by covering for the constitutionally ineligible Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio.

Consider this exchange with Gary Wilmott of Give Us Liberty1776 who called in to KABC’s Peter Tilden Show yesterday to discuss Ted Cruz and his ineligibility. This is an example of how the media continue to control the message and will not allow a dialogue.  Hence the vast majority of Americans continue to be ridivuled or fed lies, falsehoods and propaganda on this issue.  … “

# # # #

constitution-with-flag-background.jpg

For the true Originalist understanding and meaning of “natural born Citizen” click on the image

A Lesson from History. Is Being Simply Born a Citizen (Citizen at/by Birth) of the United States of Sufficient Citizenship Status to be President of the United States and Commander in Chief of Our Military? The Founders and Framers Emphatically Decided … No, It Was Not!

By: CDR Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., P.E. (Retired)

During the process of developing a new U.S. Constitution Alexander Hamilton submitted a suggested draft for a Constitution on June 18, 1787. At some point, he also suggested to the framers a proposal for the qualification requirements in Article II as to the necessary Citizenship status for the office of President and Commander in Chief of the Military. Another version of Hamilton’s proposed Constitution and which principles were stated during the convention’s deliberations per Madison notes and journal (see work of Farrand – pg 619), was given to Madison near the close of the convention for inclusion in Madison record of events for the convention. Hamilton’s proposed Constitution was not accepted.

Alexander Hamilton’s suggested presidential eligibility clause:

“No person shall be eligible to the office of President of the United States unless he be now a Citizen of one of the States, or hereafter be born a Citizen of the United States.”

Many of the founders and framers rightly had a fear of foreign influence on the person who would in the future be President of the United States since this particular office was singularly and uniquely powerful under the proposed new Constitution. The President was also to be the Commander in Chief of the military. This fear of foreign influence on a future President and Commander in Chief was particularly strongly felt by John Jay, who later became the first Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. He felt so strongly about the issue of potential foreign influence that he took it upon himself to draft a letter to General George Washington, the presiding officer of the Constitutional Convention, recommending/hinting that the framers should strengthen the Citizenship requirements. John Jay was an avid reader and proponent of natural law and particularly Vattel’s treatise on Natural Law and the Law of Nations. In his letter to Washington he said that the Citizenship requirement for the office of the commander of our armies should contain a “strong check” against foreign influence and he recommended to Washington that the command of the military be open only to a “natural born Citizen”. Thus Jay did not agree that simply being a “born Citizen” or “born a Citizen” was sufficient enough protection from foreign influence in the singular most powerful office in the new form of government. He wanted another adjective added to the eligibility clause, i.e., ‘natural’. And that word natural goes to the Citizenship status of one’s parents, both of them, when their child is born, as per natural law.

The below is the relevant proposed change language from Jay’s letter which he proposed to strengthen the citizenship requirements in Article II and to require more than just being a “born Citizen” of the United States to serve as a future Commander in Chief and President.

John Jay wrote in a letter to George Washington dated 25 Jul 1787:

“Permit me to hint, whether it would be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expressly that the Commander in Chief of the American army shall not be given to nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen. “

See a transcription of Jay’s letter to Washington at this link. This letter from Jay was written on July 25, 1787. General Washington passed on the recommendation from Jay to the convention and it was adopted in the final draft and was accepted adding the adjective “natural” making it “natural born Citizen of the United States” for future Presidents and Commanders in Chief of the military, rather than Hamilton’s proposed “born a Citizen”. Thus Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution, the fundamental law of our nation reads:

Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of U.S. Constitution as adopted 17 Sep 1787:

“No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”

There you have the crux of the issue now before the nation and the answer.

Hamilton’s proposed principles for a Constitution and a presidential citizenship eligibility requirement therein requiring that a Citizen simply had to be ‘born a Citizen’ of the USA, i.e., a Citizen by Birth. See Madison’s comment in his journal of the convention re this fact in which it reports as follows: ” … Copy of a paper Communicated to J. M. by Col. Hamilton, about the close of the Convention in Philada. 1787, which he said delineated the Constitution which he would have wished to be proposed by the Convention: He had stated the principles of it in the course of the deliberations. …” — 3 Max Farrand, The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787, at 619-630 (1911) – page 619. But that citizenship status for who could be President was rejected by the framers as insufficient. Instead of allowing any person “born a citizen” to be President and Commander of the military, the framers chose to adopt the more stringent requirement recommended by John Jay via George Washington, i.e., requiring the Citizen to be a “natural born Citizen“, to block any chance of the person with foreign influence or allegiances or claims on their allegiance at birth from becoming President and Commander of the Military. No person having any foreign influence or claim of allegiance on them at birth could serve as a future President. The person must be a “natural born citizen” with unity of citizenship and sole allegiance to the United States at birth.

Jay’s proposal and recommended clause added the additional adjective of “natural” before simply being a “born Citizen” which was proposed by Hamilton. And that word and adjective “natural” means something special from the laws of nature that modifies just being born a Citizen of the USA such as being simply born on the soil of the United States. Natural means from nature by the facts of nature of one’s birth. Not created retroactively after the fact by a man-made law. A natural born Citizen needs no man-made law to bestow Citizenship on them. The added adjective “natural” comes from Natural Law which is recognized the world over as universal law and which is the foundation of the Law of Nations which was codified by Vattel in 1758 in his preeminent legal treatise used by the founders, The Law of Nations or Principles of Natural Law. In Vol.1 Chapter 19 of Vattel’s Law of Nations, the “Des citoyens et naturels“, Vattel in Section 212 explains to us (the French term “naturels” was translated to English in 1781 in the Journal of the Continental Congress and in the 1797 English edition of Vattel), to tell us that the “natural born Citizens” are those born in the country to parents (plural) who are Citizens of the country when their child is born. These are the natural Citizens of the nation per universal principles of natural law for which no man-made law is necessary to explain or justify. Such a person, a natural born Citizen, is born with unity of Citizenship and sole allegiance at birth due to having been both born on the soil AND being born to two Citizen parents. The person who would be President must be a second generation American with no foreign claims of allegiance on them at birth under the law of nations and natural law, the child of two Citizens and born in the USA. This is a much stronger check to foreign influence than simply being born a Citizen say on the soil of the USA but with one or the other parent being a foreigner, such as is the case of Obama. The situation with Obama’s birth Citizenship status is exactly the problem that the founders and framers did not want. They did not want the child of a foreign national, non-U.S. citizen serving as President and Commander of our military. This was a national security concern to them. And it is a national security concern now.

Another founder of our nation and great historian of the American Revolution named David Ramsay contemporaneously defined in a 1789 essay what the term “natural born Citizen” means. Read a copy of Ramsay’s original dissertation at this link. Other research papers from history on the term “natural born Citizen” published long before the current controversy was created by the 2008 election debacle can be read at this link. The paper by Breckenridge Long in 1916 is a particularly good one.

The current defacto president and unconstitutional occupier of the Oval Office Barack Hussein Obama II may or may not be a born Citizen of the USA depending on what the 1961 contemporaneous birth registration documents sealed in Hawaii reveal. And Americans have good reason to be greatly concerned about the truth as to where he was physically born as opposed to where his birth may have been falsely registered by his maternal grandmother as occurring in Hawaii as this Catalog of Evidence details. But he can never be a “natural born Citizen of the United States” since his father was a foreigner, a British Subject who was never a U.S. Citizen and was not even an immigrant to the USA. Since his father was a British Subject and not a U.S. Citizen when Obama was born, Obama was born a British Subject. The founders and framers are probably rolling over in their graves knowing this person was sworn in as the putative President and Commander of our military.

Ted Cruz was born a citizen of Canada due his birth in Canada to a Cuban father. Marco Rubio was born a citizen of Cuba due to his birth to two Cuban national parents when he was born. And Bobby Jindal was born a citizen of India due to his birth to parents who were citizens of India when he was born. Thus all three were born with citizenship in more than one country and divided allegiances at birth.

The founders rejected acquisition of Citizenship by birth on the soil without consideration as to who were the parents. That is clear from the history and evolution of the writing the eligibility clause in Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, which specifies who can be President and Commander in Chief of the military.

So, is a person who is simply being declared “born a Citizen” at/by birth by STATUTORY LAWS passed at some point in time by Congress, and liberalized more and more from time to time by Congress, per its “Naturalization Powers” permitted constitutionally to be President of the USA? The answer is a resounding NO per the founders and framers. Being a “born Citizen the United States” is a necessary but NOT sufficient part of being a “natural born Citizen of the United States”. Natural born Citizens are a subset of “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” but not all “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” are “natural born Citizens”: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/06/20/of-natural-born-citizens-and-citizens-at-birth-and-basic-logic-trees-are-plants-but-not-all-plants-are-trees-natural-born-citizens-nbc-are-citizens-at-birth-cab-but-not-all-cab/ Only a “natural born Citizen” can be the President of the USA and Commander in Chief of our military. Obama is NOT a natural born Citizen of the USA and is thus constitutionally not eligible (to constitutional standards) to serve as President and Commander in Chief of the military. And the same goes for Cruz, Rubio, and Jindal.

SBTP Dolly Madison Quote du Jour: “The Constitution was signed September 17, 1787, by 39 brave men who changed the world.”

CDR Charles Kerchner, P.E. (Retired)
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com
http://www.protectourliberty.org
http://www.scribd.com/protectourliberty/collections/

P.S. Here is a chart which lists and explains the five (5) Citizenship terms used in the U.S. Constitution.
P.P.S. Being a “born Citizen” or “Citizen at Birth” is not identically the same as a being a “natural born Citizen”.
P.P.P.S. Obama is NOT a “natural born Citizen of the United States” to U.S. Constitutional standards. Read this essay regarding the legal term of art “natural born Citizen” and basic logic, i.e., trees are plants but not all plants are trees. Natural born Citizens are a subset of “born Citizens (citizens at birth)”. All “natural born Citizens” are “born Citizens (citizens at birth) but not all “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” are “natural born Citizens”: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/06/20/of-natural-born-citizens-and-citizens-at-birth-and-basic-logic-trees-are-plants-but-not-all-plants-are-trees-natural-born-citizens-nbc-are-citizens-at-birth-cab-but-not-all-cab/ Also read the “Three Legged Stool Test” for Natural Born Citizen https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2013/11/15/the-three-legged-stool-test-analogy-for-natural-born-citizenship-of-the-united-states-to-constitutional-standards/ … AND … http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html Also watch this video by the renowned constitutional scholar Dr. Herb Titus: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esiZZ-1R7e8

November 19, 2015

Obama Extols Islam Again and Again

Obama Secret Member of the Muslim Brotherhood - A Named Terrorist Organization.  Aided and Abetted the Enemy in Egypt. Click on Image to Learn More About Obama the Fraud & Big Lie.

Obama Secret Member of the Muslim Brotherhood – A Named Terrorist Organization. He Aided and Abetted the Enemy in Egypt. Click on Image to Learn More.

Obama Extols Islam Again and Again | by Sharon Rondeau | @ ThePostEmail.com

Read the article here:  http://www.thepostemail.com/2015/11/19/obama-extols-islam-again-and-again/

Also, listen to Investigative Reporter and Editor of ThePostEmail.com Sharon Rondeau on BlogTalkRadio tonight at 9 p.m. ET at:  http://www.blogtalkradio.com/wheresobamasbirthcertificatexcom/2015/11/20/the-latest-on-the-confidential-informant-tapes-in-arpaio-case

See this. Did Obama just admit he is a Muslim. A Freudian slip in his use of we in describing the Islamic community: http://www.c-span.org/video/?c4560477/president-obama-just-admit-muslim&start=42

Learn the truth about Islam:  http://www.kerchner.com/islam/books.htm

My comment:  Obama is exactly the example and reason a person who is not a “natural born Citizen” (a person born with sole allegiance to the USA and only the USA-a person born in the USA to parents who are both Citizens of the USA when their child is born) should ever be allowed into the office of the Presidency and command of our military. Obama was born into and raised with an anti-American culture due to his divided allegiances at birth.  His father was a foreign national who was not even an immigrant to this country. Combine that with his mother who married Muslims and espoused anti-American culture and lived a large part of her life outside the USA and you have a mixture for a person raised who does not have the best interests of America in his innate nature. Obama is exactly the type of multiple birth allegiances, divided loyalties, citizen-of-the-world person that the founders and framers did not wish to be allowed to become President and Commander in Chief when they put the “natural born Citizen” clause into the presidential eligibility clause of our U.S. Constitution.  Obama is not 100% loyal to the USA. He was born and raised with multiple allegiances and divided loyalties.  He still harbors divided loyalties.  The major media must expose him. Congress must impeach him.

Obama lies continually to cover his true nature and objectives. Obama named Liar of the Year. Obama is a secret member of Muslim Brotherhood. Their members are trained to lie and they using the Islamic principles of TAQIYYA and KITMAN on steroids to hide their anti-American activities.

CDR Charles Kerchner, P.E. (Retired)
Lehigh Valley PA USA
http://www.protectourliberty.org/
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/
http://www.scribd.com/protectourliberty/collections/

P.S. Also read this essay regarding the constitutional term in the presidential eligibility clause “natural born Citizen” and basic logic, i.e., trees are plants but not all plants are trees. Natural born Citizens are a subset of “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” but not all “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” are “natural born Citizens”: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/06/20/of-natural-born-citizens-and-citizens-at-birth-and-basic-logic-trees-are-plants-but-not-all-plants-are-trees-natural-born-citizens-nbc-are-citizens-at-birth-cab-but-not-all-cab/ … AND … http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html Also watch this video by the renowned constitutional scholar Dr. Herb Titus — Part I: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esiZZ-1R7e8 and Part II: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoaZ8WextxQ

ProtectOurLiberty WebsiteSpaceMy BlogSpaceDocs Collections Re Obama SpaceMy YouTube SpaceMost Recent Full Pg Ad SpaceAd Archives SpaceFliers/Handouts SpaceBlock Ads SpaceSheriff to Sheriffs – Sheriff Kit Project SpaceGet A Sheriff Kit SpaceInterviews-Audio/Print SpaceBooks SpaceGoat’s Ledge SpaceContact Me

 

October 15, 2015

Obama’s June 2008 Short-Form Birth Certificate Forgery Controversy Revisited

Obama's short form and long form birth documents are both forgeries

Obama’s June 2008 short-form and April 2011 long-form birth documents and images are both computer generated forgeries

Obama’s June 2008 Short-Form Birth Certificate Forgery Controversy Revisited

Sharon Rondeau has written another great article at The Post & Email online newspaper re Obama’s constitutional ineligibility to be Commander in Chief and President and about his forged key ID documents.

Why is the major media still ignoring all the problems with Obama’s June 2008 short-form birth certificate, the dispute over which got Lou Dobbs pulled of the air at CNN? It must be pointed out that Hawaii has never officially and unequivocally stated that said short-form images on the White House servers (which is there along with an image of alleged long-form), and/or variations of the image elsewhere on the net, is a true and correct copy of what they sent to Obama in 2008?  Remember, that is the year he has publicly said that he requested it from Hawaii and allegedly received it.

How did the Daily Kos get an alleged document image of the short-from birth certificate before the Obama campaign websites and why has the Daily Kos never stated for the record where they got it, and from whom exactly?

And why is the White House using an image of Obama’s Short-Form Birth Certificate from Snopes.com’s website.  It is another variation of the alleged short-form document and is Not the full color version first released in June 2008 at the Daily Kos.  Why isn’t the White House using a full color image of the alleged original paper document taken themselves in the White House?  They do have the original paper document, or don’t they?  Why did they use those kids at FactCheck.org to take some pictures of yet another forged version of the alleged document.  Invite some reporters to the White House, pass around the original, let them examine it, and take high resolution photos of it, particularly the seal.  If Obama has the original that should be easy. Why use an image put up by either Snopes.com, Daily Kos, or FactCheck.org, all of which images are different ?

Why isn’t the major media digging into this 2008-2011 short-form Obama birth certificate forgery and controversy instead of sweeping it under the rhetorical carpet, ignoring the short-term forgery, and accepting without question the more recent April 2011 long-form forgery.  Why isn’t the major media doing detailed examinations of both the short-form and long-form document images on the White House server using their in-house image and graphics experts and then have said major media in-houses graphics experts give a full report on same using their name and position and officially go on record about these digital images? How does Obama get away with ever changing life narrative lies and forged documents which are then conveniently forgotten after Obama comes out with a new lie and new forged documents to cover-up or change the narrative he was using before? Why doesn’t the major media finally ask the Daily Kos where they got that first image in June 2008 and from exactly whom?

Read Sharon Rondeau’s excellent new article about an old but not forgotten Obama forged ID document here: http://www.thepostemail.com/2015/10/15/why-does-the-obama-short-form-birth-certificate-indicate-that-it-came-from-snopes-com/

Stop on by The Post & Email newspaper site and read some excellent articles on the various Obama scandals and controversies. Bookmark it and visit every day or so to see what is new with the Constitutionalist movement to support and defend our Constitution and our Republic:  http://www.thepostemail.com

CDR Charles Kerchner, P.E. (Retired)
Lehigh Valley PA USA
http://www.protectourliberty.org/
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/
http://www.scribd.com/protectourliberty/collections/

P.S. Also read this essay regarding the constitutional term in the presidential eligibility clause “natural born Citizen” and basic logic, i.e., trees are plants but not all plants are trees. Natural born Citizens are a subset of “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” but not all “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” are “natural born Citizens”: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/06/20/of-natural-born-citizens-and-citizens-at-birth-and-basic-logic-trees-are-plants-but-not-all-plants-are-trees-natural-born-citizens-nbc-are-citizens-at-birth-cab-but-not-all-cab/ … AND … http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html Also watch this video by the renowned constitutional scholar Dr. Herb Titus — Part I: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esiZZ-1R7e8 and Part II: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoaZ8WextxQ

ProtectOurLiberty WebsiteSpaceMy BlogSpaceDocs Collections Re Obama SpaceMy YouTube SpaceMost Recent Full Pg Ad SpaceAd Archives SpaceFliers/Handouts SpaceBlock Ads SpaceSheriff to Sheriffs – Sheriff Kit Project SpaceGet A Sheriff Kit SpaceInterviews-Audio/Print SpaceBooks SpaceGoat’s Ledge SpaceContact Me

September 24, 2015

Early Birther Chris Matthews in Dec 2007 Aired on MSNBC the Clinton Operatives Talk About Obama Born in Indonesia and Obama’s Islamic Background

Unearthed Video: Early Birther Hillary Clinton via Chris Matthews in Dec 2007 Gets Aired and Widely Spread on MSNBC the Stories Saying Obama Born In Indonesia And Has Islamic Background All the While Being Critical of Others Talking About It.  Blaming Them But Chris Matthews Is Giving the Story Legs While Doing It.  Who Really Was the Clever One Getting the Story Out That Hillary and Her Political Operatives Wanted Out and Was Carrying Hillary Clinton’s Water to Get This Story Out Further and Feigning Outrage About It Out Back in Dec 2007:  http://www.birtherreport.com/2015/09/unearthed-video-chris-matthews-reports.html

Excerpt

Full Segment

However, It Should Be Remembered That Obama Himself Was The Very First Birther. See This Collection Of Statements and Writings Over Many Years That He Was Not Born In The USA:  https://www.scribd.com/collections/3248475/Kenyan-Gov-Officials-African-Newspapers-Obama-1991-Bio-Barry-Obama-Obama-Family-Mbrs-and-other-Accounts-Reporting-Obama-is-Kenyan-Born

While Chris Matthews was willing to spread the talk about Obama’s connections and sympathies to Islam back in Dec 2007 he now expresses outrage when Republican Party candidates mention it or anything critical of Islam.  But the facts are the facts, western civilization has a well founded right and historical grounds to fear the spread of Islam into our democracies and the infiltration of our government based on its founding tenets that were preached by its prophet Mohammad and its history.  Islam is both a supremacist combined political system and religion, unlike other large world religions. The founder of Christianity, Jesus said render unto Caeser what is Caeser’s and unto God what is God’s.  There is no separation of church and state in Islam and it is totally incompatible to our U.S. Constitution and our republic.  Islamists will submit to western constitutional laws until they get enough numbers.  At that point they will object and demand the establishment of Sharia Law.  First for them and then eventually for everyone once they gain majority political power.  It is a supremacist religion and political system that is intolerant of other religions and western concepts of government.  In Islamic teachings their religious Sharia law is supreme and is the foundation law of their states.  Islam’s tenets teach that there will be no peace in the world until the whole world submits to Islam and is governed by Islamic Sharia Law and thus the centuries of Jihad beginning since the days of their prophet against its non-Islamic neighbors, either by force of arms or by infiltration and migration.  Learn more as to why we in the western democracies should be very concerned about the recent large scale spread of Mohammedans  to Europe and elsewhere, including plans to allow 10s if not 100s of thousand to migrate to the USA due to their continued religious warring within their own ranks and with their neighbors in the middle east:  http://www.kerchner.com/islam/books.htm

CDR Charles Kerchner, P.E., (Retired)
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com
http://www.protectourliberty.org
http://www.scribd.com/protectourliberty/collections/

P.S. Here is a chart which lists and explains the five (5) Citizenship terms used in the U.S. Constitution.
P.P.S. Being a “born Citizen” or “Citizen at Birth” is not identically the same as a being a “natural born Citizen”.
P.P.P.S. Obama is NOT a “natural born Citizen of the United States” to U.S. Constitutional standards. Read this essay regarding the legal term of art “natural born Citizen” and basic logic, i.e., trees are plants but not all plants are trees. Natural born Citizens are a subset of “born Citizens (citizens at birth)”. All “natural born Citizens” are “born Citizens (citizens at birth) but not all “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” are “natural born Citizens”: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/06/20/of-natural-born-citizens-and-citizens-at-birth-and-basic-logic-trees-are-plants-but-not-all-plants-are-trees-natural-born-citizens-nbc-are-citizens-at-birth-cab-but-not-all-cab/ Also read the “Three Legged Stool Test” for Natural Born Citizen https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2013/11/15/the-three-legged-stool-test-analogy-for-natural-born-citizenship-of-the-united-states-to-constitutional-standards/ … AND … http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html Also watch this video by the renowned constitutional scholar Dr. Herb Titus: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esiZZ-1R7e8

September 1, 2015

Atty Mario Apuzzo and CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) on TheWakeUpMission BlogTalkRadio Show

Atty Mario Apuzzo and CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) on TheWakeUpMission BlogTalkRadio Show (Truth Tuesday Edition) Hosted by Randy Dees 1 Sep 2015. The Show Runs from 7 P.M. to 9 P.M. ET.  Atty Apuzzo and CDR Kerchner (Ret) Join the Show at 8 P.M. ET (the 2nd hour of the show)

The show topic is the Presidential Eligibility Clause in the U.S. Constitution and the term therein “natural born Citizen” with a specific focus on Ted Cruz and his lack of constitutional eligibility since he is not a “natural born Citizen” for two reasons. He was born in Canada and also born to a non-U.S. Citizen father.  A born Citizen aka “Citizen” at/by birth is NOT a “natural born Citizen” at/by birth.  The term “born a Citizen” was rejected as in insufficient qualifier by our country’s founders and framers.  Adjectives mean something.  The word “natural” in a legal term means something special, that is, something defined by Natural Law, not man-made Positive Law.  A “natural born Citizen” is a person born in the country to parents who are both Citizens of the country (born or naturalized).  That person gains that status by the “Laws of Nature” and “Natural Law”, not by a man-made law, court dicta, or action of Congress.  Atty Apuzzo and CDR Kerchner (Ret) will lead an educational discussion on the difference between statutory law “Citizen” at Birth and natural law “natural born Citizen” at Birth .  Other candidates who clearly lack constitutional eligibility will be discussed such as Marco Rubio and Bobby Jindal.   And of course, the Usurper-in-Chief – Barack Obama, the current defacto President and Commander-in-Chief, will be covered too.

Listen live or on podcast later at:  http://www.blogtalkradio.com/thewakeupmission/2015/09/01/truth-tuesday-and-guests-charles-kerchner-and-mario-apuzzo Fast forward to 1 hour and 4 minutes in to where the guests join the show if you listen on podcast.

Post show discussion and coverage here:  http://www.birtherreport.com/2015/09/full-audio-fantastic-discussion-on.html

More coverage of the radio show here:  http://www.thepostemail.com/2015/09/02/kerchner-apuzzo-discuss-meaning-and-significance-of-natural-born-citizen-pb/

CDR Charles Kerchner, P.E. (Retired)
Lehigh Valley PA USA
http://www.protectourliberty.org/
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/
http://www.scribd.com/protectourliberty/collections/

P.S. Read this essay regarding the constitutional term in the presidential eligibility clause “natural born Citizen” and basic logic, i.e., trees are plants but not all plants are trees. Natural born Citizens are a subset of “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” but not all “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” are “natural born Citizens”: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/06/20/of-natural-born-citizens-and-citizens-at-birth-and-basic-logic-trees-are-plants-but-not-all-plants-are-trees-natural-born-citizens-nbc-are-citizens-at-birth-cab-but-not-all-cab/ … AND … http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html Also watch this video by the renowned constitutional scholar Dr. Herb Titus — Part I: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esiZZ-1R7e8 and Part II: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoaZ8WextxQ

ProtectOurLiberty WebsiteSpaceMy BlogSpaceDocs Collections Re Obama SpaceMy YouTube SpaceMost Recent Full Pg Ad SpaceAd Archives SpaceFliers/Handouts SpaceBlock Ads SpaceSheriff to Sheriffs – Sheriff Kit Project SpaceGet A Sheriff Kit SpaceInterviews-Audio/Print SpaceBooks SpaceGoat’s Ledge SpaceContact Me

Next Page »

The Rubric Theme. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,385 other followers

%d bloggers like this: