Featured

U.S. Senator Kamala Harris is NOT a ‘natural born Citizen” of USA – NOT Eligible to be President and CinC or VP

U.S. Senator Kamala Harris is NOT a ‘natural born Citizen‘ of USA – NOT Eligible to be President and Commander-in-Chief of Our Military per U.S. Constitution or VP

kamala-harris-fails-three-legged-stool-test-for-natural-born-citizen-5

A Simple Euler Logic Diagram Shows Logical Relationship of “natural born Citizens” to Other Type “Citizens” of the United States. Only a “natural born Citizen” Can Constitutionally be the President and Commander in Chief or the Vice-President. Click on Image For More Information.

Both of Senator Kamala Harris’s parents were not U.S. Citizens when Kamala was born. Kamala Harris was born to a Jamaican Citizen father (minus one stool leg) and to a Citizen of India mother (minus the 2nd stool leg).

Senator Kamala Harris’s staff has refused to answer any questions regarding the citizenship status of her parents when she was born. The normal path to becoming a naturalized U.S. Citizen takes five years. Kamala Harris was born in 1964. Her father emigrated from Jamaica to the USA in 1961. Her mother emigrated from India to the USA in 1960. Thus there was not sufficient time for either of Kamala’s parents to become naturalized U.S. Citizens. Kamala’s father eventually became a naturalized U.S. Citizen per his bio. It is not known at this time if Kamala’s mother ever became a naturalized U.S. Citizen. She moved to Canada with Kamala when Kamala was about seven years old. It is possible that Kamala’s mother might have naturalized at some point as a Canadian citizen. Kamala Harris’s mother is now deceased. As I said in the first sentence, Senator Harris is not being transparent on this issue and her office staff has refused to answer any questions on this subject. Given Kamala Harris’s year of birth, and her parents emigration years, she was born in the USA to two foreign nationals and thus inherited their respective birth nation’s citizenship when she was born, in addition to being a basic Citizen by being born in the USA to aliens legally domiciled here. Thus Senator Kamala Harris was born with citizenship and required allegiance at birth to three countries. This is hardly what the founders and framers intended when they selected the “natural born Citizen” requirement for the person who would in the future be permitted to be the President and Commander in Chief of our military, once the founding generation was gone.

As per ‘Principles of Natural Law‘ in place at the time of the founding of our country and when the founding documents including the U.S. Constitution were written, a ‘natural born Citizen’ is one born in the country to parents who are both Citizens (born Citizens or naturalized Citizens) of that country when their child is born in the country. See ‘The Three Legged Stool Test‘ for a graphic presentation of this constitutional requirement as to who can be President and Commander in Chief or our military. See the Euler Diagram shown to the right for a logic diagram presentation of this constitutional requirement.

U.S. Senator Kamala Harris is NOT a ‘natural born Citizen” of the United States to constitutional standards since both of her parents were foreign nationals who were NOT U.S. citizens when Senator Harris was born in the USA. She is missing two legs of the three legs of the ‘natural born Citizen’ test. She is of course a basic “Citizen” at birth per the Wong Kim Ark legal decision by the U.S. Supreme Court of 1898, and as such she is eligible to be a U.S. Senator, but she is not a “natural born Citizen” at birth, and thus is NOT eligible to be President and Commander in Chief of our military or the Vice President, per our U.S. Constitution. She inherited multiple allegiances at birth due to her parents being foreign nationals living in the USA when she was born. Senator Kamala Harris did not have sole allegiance and unity of citizenship at birth to the USA and only the USA.

Some other politicians besides Kamala Harris (D) in the two major political parties who have been mentioned for future election to high national political office, who are also not a “natural born Citizen” to constitutional standards are:  Marco Rubio (R), Ted Cruz (R), Bobby Jindal (R), and Nikki Haley (R). Both major political parties are choosing to ignore the founders and framers intent and understanding of what a “natural born Citizen” is in order to run candidates that they believe are very marketable political candidates. This started in a major way in the 2008 election cycle with Obama vs McCain.

For more information about the ‘natural born Citizen’ term read this White Paper essay – The Who, What, When, Where, Why, and How the Natural Born Citizen Term was Put Into Our U.S. Constitution as to eligibility for the office of the President of the United States | by CDR Charles F. Kerchner, Jr. (Ret). 

Click here or here to get a PDF copy of this article.

CDR Charles Kerchner, P.E. (Retired)
Lehigh Valley PA USA
http://www.protectourliberty.org/
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/
http://www.scribd.com/user/52640192/protectourliberty/lists

P.S. Also read the following essays regarding the presidential eligibility term “natural born Citizen” in Article II of the U.S. Constitution:

1.  Natural born Citizen and basic logic, i.e., trees are plants but not all plants are trees. Natural born Citizens are a subset of “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” but not all “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” are “natural born Citizens”: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/06/20/of-natural-born-citizens-and-citizens-at-birth-and-basic-logic-trees-are-plants-but-not-all-plants-are-trees-natural-born-citizens-nbc-are-citizens-at-birth-cab-but-not-all-cab/

2.  Citizenship Terms Used in the U.S. Constitution – The 5 Terms Defined & Some Legal Reference to Same | by CDR Charles F. Kerchner, Jr. (Ret):  http://www.scribd.com/doc/11737124/Citizenship-Terms-Used-in-the-U-S-Constitution-The-5-Terms-Defined-Some-Legal-Reference-to-Same

3.  U.S. Constitution Article II Presidential Eligibility Facts:  http://www.scribd.com/document/161994312/Article-II-Presidential-Eligibility-Facts

 

Obama Spent the First Year of His Life in “Greater CHAZ” — Who Knew?

Obama spent his first year in CHAZ – who knew? | by Jack Cashill | @ WND.com

In his 1995 memoir, “Dreams from My Father,” Obama claimed his father left Hawaii in 1963, when he “was only 2 years old.” Unchallenged by the major media, Obama continued to peddle this fiction throughout his presidency.

It sustained what Obama biographer David Remnick called Obama’s “signature appeal: the use of the details of his own life as a reflection of a kind of multicultural ideal.” Like much of what Obama said, it was false.

In the summer of 2008, two journalists set out to tell the story of Obama’s early years in Hawaii. One was Pulitzer Prize winner David Maraniss, whose research would culminate in a 10,000-word article in the Washington Post.

The other was citizen journalist Michael Patrick Leahy. Leahy’s research would culminate in an 8,000-word chapter in his self-published book, “What Does Barack Obama Believe?”

Working with considerably fewer resources and without the backing of a celebrated newsroom, Leahy talked to many of the same people Maraniss did. Given his limitations, he did his research strictly by phone and internet.

As a reporter, however, Leahy did have one major advantage. He was prepared to challenge the Obama myth and said so right up front.

“While we can’t fault Barack Obama for believing the fictional account his mother told him about his father’s role in his early life,” wrote Leahy, “we can fault him for failing to undertake even the most rudimentary investigation of the truth behind this fictional account as an adult, and subsequently perpetuating that fiction publicly for over 13 years.” …  continue reading at:  https://www.wnd.com/2020/06/obama-spent-first-year-chaz-knew/

# # # #

!A_mccain-obamaBorn
Read How the Fix Was In for the 2008 Election by Both the DNC and RNC

CDR Charles Kerchner, P.E. (Retired)
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com
http://www.scribd.com/user/52640192/protectourliberty/lists
http://www.protectourliberty.org

Other suggested reading and viewing on being a “natural born Citizen” of the United States:

1.  A chart which lists and explains the five (5) Citizenship terms used in the U.S. Constitution.

2. Being a “born Citizen” or “Citizen at Birth” is not identically the same as a being a “natural born Citizen”.

3. Read this essay regarding the constitutional term “natural born Citizen” and basic logic, i.e., trees are plants but not all plants are trees. “Natural born Citizens” are a subset of “born Citizens (citizens at birth)”. Adjectives mean something.  All “natural born Citizens” are “born Citizens (citizens at birth) but not all “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” are “natural born Citizens”:  https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/06/20/of-natural-born-citizens-and-citizens-at-birth-and-basic-logic-trees-are-plants-but-not-all-plants-are-trees-natural-born-citizens-nbc-are-citizens-at-birth-cab-but-not-all-cab/ 

4. A Euler Diagram which logically shows the kinds of U.S. Citizens and their set and subset relationships: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2018/06/16/natural-born-citizen/

5. The “Three Legged Stool Test” for being a Natural Born Citizen: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2013/11/15/the-three-legged-stool-test-analogy-for-natural-born-citizenship-of-the-united-states-to-constitutional-standards/

6. Article II Presidential Eligibility Facts:  http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html  or  https://www.scribd.com/document/161994312/Article-II-Presidential-Eligibility-Facts 

7. Watch these videos (Parts I and II) by the renowned constitutional scholar Dr. Herb Titus: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esiZZ-1R7e8  and  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoaZ8WextxQ

8. Read, download, and print a PDF copy of this White Paper by CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) about the “natural born Citizen” term and presidential eligibility clause in Article II of our U.S. Constitution here: http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/The-Who-What-When-Where-Why-and-How-of-NBC-Term-in-Constitution.pdf

 

 

Collin Powell, You are Not Telling the Truth | by Sharon Rondeau

Collin Powell, You are Not Telling the Truth | by Sharon Rondeau | @ ThePostEmail.com

THE DEEP STATE CARES NOT FOR THE CONSTITUTION

by Sharon Rondeau

(Jun. 7, 2020) — Dear Gen. Powell:

On Sunday morning, much was made of your revelation that you will not be voting for Donald Trump in November.  That does not come as a surprise since you voted for the “transformational figure” known as “Barack Hussein Obama,” a Democrat, twice, and were at odds on occasion with President George W. Bush, the Republican president under whom you served as secretary of state.

Predictably, as if in lockstep, the media rewarded you for toeing the line against a president it despises, punctuating a week in which your former military colleagues pummeled him in what appears to be an orchestrated undertaking to limit his tenure in the Oval Office to one term.

Was “Obama” adequately “transformational” for you?  During his eight years in office, we saw economic devastation during what would become a ten-year recession; the closure of auto dealerships at a whim, contributing to growing unemployment; socialized medicine forced upon us in which the promise that we could “keep our doctor” was proven false; the downing of Extortion 17 in the largest Navy SEAL Team Six loss in U.S. history; numerous domestic terror attacks amid the denial that radical Islamic ideology was the cause; the Justice Department spying on journalists and the CIA spying on the Senate Intelligence Committee; the NSA spying on Congress and Israeli leaders; the needless loss of four American lives in Benghazi, Libya on September 11, 2012; $400 million in cash, followed by another $1.3 billion, sent in the dead of night to the Iranian mullahs without congressional approval or even knowledge; a decimated military; rising racial tensions and deteriorating police-community relations; and a demoralized populace.

When you told Jake Tapper that you took umbrage with Trump’s “insulting” of the late Sen. John McCain, did you consider McCain’s role in circulating the now-infamous Steele dossier which led to the 2+-year Russia “collusion” investigation targeting Trump and his 2016 campaign aides?  You know, or should know:  the FBI’s bogus “collusion” allegations followed by a $40 million “Special Counsel” probe which tore apart the nation, ruined lives and careers, and sent people to prison as collateral damage?  Would it not have been grating to you, as president, that McCain, another Republican for whom you did not vote, cast the deciding vote to prevent the “Obamacare” repeal that Trump and Senate Republicans sought?

Your opening words to Tapper, “We have a Constitution,” ring hollow, as your obvious modus operandi was to join the chorus of retired “Deep State” generals to influence public opinion in favor of a big-government, now-confused, incoherent woman- and child-groping plagiarist who reportedly knew about the ill-conceived “Crossfire Hurricane” investigation in which FBI agents and DOJ officials attempted to sabotage a presidential election and administration.  …   continue reading at:  https://www.thepostemail.com/2020/06/07/colin-powell-you-are-not-telling-the-truth/

Also see this additional article re Collin Powell by Joseph DeMaio:  Collin Power, Reporting for Duty – The Definition of Propaganda:  https://www.thepostemail.com/2020/06/07/colin-powell-reporting-for-duty/

# # # #

Click on image for more historical and constitutional information about who is a “natural born Citizen” and who is not

CDR Charles Kerchner, P.E. (Retired)
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com
http://www.scribd.com/user/52640192/protectourliberty/lists
http://www.protectourliberty.org

Other suggested reading and viewing on being a “natural born Citizen” of the United States:

1.  A chart which lists and explains the five (5) Citizenship terms used in the U.S. Constitution.

2. Being a “born Citizen” or “Citizen at Birth” is not identically the same as a being a “natural born Citizen”.

3. Read this essay regarding the constitutional term “natural born Citizen” and basic logic, i.e., trees are plants but not all plants are trees. “Natural born Citizens” are a subset of “born Citizens (citizens at birth)”. Adjectives mean something.  All “natural born Citizens” are “born Citizens (citizens at birth) but not all “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” are “natural born Citizens”:  https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/06/20/of-natural-born-citizens-and-citizens-at-birth-and-basic-logic-trees-are-plants-but-not-all-plants-are-trees-natural-born-citizens-nbc-are-citizens-at-birth-cab-but-not-all-cab/ 

4. A Euler Diagram which logically shows the kinds of U.S. Citizens and their set and subset relationships: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2018/06/16/natural-born-citizen/

5. The “Three Legged Stool Test” for being a Natural Born Citizen: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2013/11/15/the-three-legged-stool-test-analogy-for-natural-born-citizenship-of-the-united-states-to-constitutional-standards/

6. Article II Presidential Eligibility Facts:  http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html  or  https://www.scribd.com/document/161994312/Article-II-Presidential-Eligibility-Facts 

7. Watch these videos (Parts I and II) by the renowned constitutional scholar Dr. Herb Titus: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esiZZ-1R7e8  and  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoaZ8WextxQ

8. Read, download, and print a PDF copy of this White Paper by CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) about the “natural born Citizen” term and presidential eligibility clause in Article II of our U.S. Constitution here: http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/The-Who-What-When-Where-Why-and-How-of-NBC-Term-in-Constitution.pdf

U.S. Senator Duckworth Holds Dual-Citizenship and Dual-Allegiance to Two Countries

Waving_flag_of_Thailand with Tammy - born in Thailand bannerU.S. Senator Tammy Duckworth Not Constitutionally Eligible to be President and Commander-in-Chief or Vice President. She is NOT a “natural born Citizen” of the United States. She Was Born in Thailand.

U.S. Senator Tammy Duckworth holds – dual-Citizenship at birth – Thailand and the USA – and thus was born with foreign influence and dual-allegiance requirements to both countries. She was born in Thailand. She does not have Unity of Citizenship and Sole Allegiance at birth to the USA and only the USA. Thus she is constitutionally not eligible to be the President and Commander-in-Chief of our military or the Vice President, which offices require singular citizenship and national allegiance at and since birth per the founders and framers. Dual-citizens at birth are not eligible. For more information: 

Read the full document at above or alternatively download a copy here:
http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/Tammy-Duckworth-petition-not-constitutionally-eligible-for-VP-or-Pres.pdf

Click on image for more historical and constitutional information about who is a “natural born Citizen” and who is not

CDR Charles Kerchner, P.E. (Retired)
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com
http://www.scribd.com/user/52640192/protectourliberty/lists
http://www.protectourliberty.org

Other suggested reading and viewing on being a “natural born Citizen” of the United States:

1.  A chart which lists and explains the five (5) Citizenship terms used in the U.S. Constitution.

2. Being a “born Citizen” or “Citizen at Birth” is not identically the same as a being a “natural born Citizen”.

3. Read this essay regarding the constitutional term “natural born Citizen” and basic logic, i.e., trees are plants but not all plants are trees. “Natural born Citizens” are a subset of “born Citizens (citizens at birth)”. Adjectives mean something.  All “natural born Citizens” are “born Citizens (citizens at birth) but not all “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” are “natural born Citizens”:  https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/06/20/of-natural-born-citizens-and-citizens-at-birth-and-basic-logic-trees-are-plants-but-not-all-plants-are-trees-natural-born-citizens-nbc-are-citizens-at-birth-cab-but-not-all-cab/ 

4. A Euler Diagram which logically shows the kinds of U.S. Citizens and their set and subset relationships: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2018/06/16/natural-born-citizen/

5. The “Three Legged Stool Test” for being a Natural Born Citizen: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2013/11/15/the-three-legged-stool-test-analogy-for-natural-born-citizenship-of-the-united-states-to-constitutional-standards/

6. Article II Presidential Eligibility Facts:  http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html  or  https://www.scribd.com/document/161994312/Article-II-Presidential-Eligibility-Facts 

7. Watch these videos (Parts I and II) by the renowned constitutional scholar Dr. Herb Titus: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esiZZ-1R7e8  and  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoaZ8WextxQ

8. Read, download, and print a PDF copy of this White Paper by CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) about the “natural born Citizen” term and presidential eligibility clause in Article II of our U.S. Constitution here: http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/The-Who-What-When-Where-Why-and-How-of-NBC-Term-in-Constitution.pdf

Is America Ready for a Dual-Citizen Vice President Born in Thailand?

Is America Ready for a [Dual-Citizen] Thai Vice President? | by Don Fredrick | @ ThePostEmail.com

VICE PRESIDENTS, TOO, MUST BE “NATURAL BORN CITIZENS”

Tammy-Duckworth-Wiki-360x450
U.S. Senator Tammy Duckworth – (D-IL) – not a natural born Citizen of the United States

(May 21, 2020) — Senator Tammy Duckworth (D-IL)—someone most voters never heard of—is reportedly on Joe Biden’s “shortlist” of potential running mates. CNN’s Chris Cillizza calls her personal story “incredible and compelling.”  (Duckworth lost both legs in Iraq.)  She is also “the second Asian American woman in the Senate” (the first being the lamebrained, Japanese-born, senior Senator from Hawaii, Mazie Hirono), while Duckworth’s “Midwestern appeal makes her an appealing pick.” Discounting the fact that using the words “appeal” and “appealing” in the same sentence tells us Cillizza is not much of a writer, the fact that he has not investigated Duckworth’s background also tells us he is not much of a journalist. It takes less than one minute on the Internet [Editor’s Note: see this link] to learn that Ladda Tammy Duckworth was born in 1968 in Bangkok, Thailand to a Thai mother of Chinese descent, Lamai Sompornpairin, and an American father, Franklin Duckworth, who worked with the United Nations. “Midwestern appeal,” Chris?

Only 12 years ago the Democrats and media leftists were falling all over themselves to insist that Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii. That was a direct refutation of those who claimed Obama could not serve as president of the United States because he was born in Kenya and was therefore not a “natural born citizen.” In 2008, everyone seemed to understand that birth in Kenya would have disqualified Obama. Why, then, in 2020, does having been born in Bangkok not disqualify Tammy Duckworth from serving as vice president (which also requires natural born citizen status)? Are memories that short? Does no one care about the U.S. Constitution? (We know New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy does not care. He infamously told Fox News’ Tucker Carlson he “wasn’t thinking of the Bill of Rights” when he imposed drastic rules on the citizens and businesses of his state because of the Wuhan virus.)

Tammy Duckworth was born in a country other than the United States, to one non-American parent and one American parent. That means she is not a natural born citizen of the United States. She is a naturalized citizen of the United States, but she is certainly not a natural born citizen. Again, if birth in Kenya would have disqualified Obama, why would birth in Thailand not disqualify Duckworth?

A federal statute, 8 U.S. Code § 1401, outlines the citizenship rules for individuals born outside the United States.   …   continue reading this excellent article at:  https://www.thepostemail.com/2020/05/21/is-america-ready-for-a-thai-vice-president/

# # # #

Click on image for more historical and constitutional information about who is a “natural born Citizen” and who is not

CDR Charles Kerchner, P.E. (Retired)
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com
http://www.scribd.com/user/52640192/protectourliberty/lists
http://www.protectourliberty.org

Other suggested reading and viewing on being a “natural born Citizen” of the United States:

1.  A chart which lists and explains the five (5) Citizenship terms used in the U.S. Constitution.

2. Being a “born Citizen” or “Citizen at Birth” is not identically the same as a being a “natural born Citizen”.

3. Read this essay regarding the constitutional term “natural born Citizen” and basic logic, i.e., trees are plants but not all plants are trees. “Natural born Citizens” are a subset of “born Citizens (citizens at birth)”. Adjectives mean something.  All “natural born Citizens” are “born Citizens (citizens at birth) but not all “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” are “natural born Citizens”:  https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/06/20/of-natural-born-citizens-and-citizens-at-birth-and-basic-logic-trees-are-plants-but-not-all-plants-are-trees-natural-born-citizens-nbc-are-citizens-at-birth-cab-but-not-all-cab/ 

4. A Euler Diagram which logically shows the kinds of U.S. Citizens and their set and subset relationships: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2018/06/16/natural-born-citizen/

5. The “Three Legged Stool Test” for being a Natural Born Citizen: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2013/11/15/the-three-legged-stool-test-analogy-for-natural-born-citizenship-of-the-united-states-to-constitutional-standards/

6. Article II Presidential Eligibility Facts:  http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html  or  https://www.scribd.com/document/161994312/Article-II-Presidential-Eligibility-Facts 

7. Watch these videos (Parts I and II) by the renowned constitutional scholar Dr. Herb Titus: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esiZZ-1R7e8  and  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoaZ8WextxQ

8. Read, download, and print a PDF copy of this White Paper by CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) about the “natural born Citizen” term and presidential eligibility clause in Article II of our U.S. Constitution here: http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/The-Who-What-When-Where-Why-and-How-of-NBC-Term-in-Constitution.pdf