Breaking News: National Archives Has “Harmful Language” Warning on Page Showing U.S. Constitution

Does the National Archives Believe the Constitution Contains “Harmful Language?” | by Sharon Rondeau @

Image source: Red arrow added by Editor pointing to the warning message. Image captured at 9:34 p.m. east coast time on 8 Sep 2021.

# # # #

My comment: So NARA now considers historical documents, including the U.S. Constitution, to be potential harmful speech and thus is discouraging people from reading them with that warning tag. It’s just one more example of the progressive far-left rapidly speeding up its agenda to re-write history, change language and the meaning of words, undermine our traditional family structure and culture, and purge history per the teachings of Antonio Gramsci and others (as exemplified in the novel “1984”) in the last 100+ years in order to undermine and bring down the USA.

Regarding why they work to change and re-define history, remember the quote “”Who controls the past controls the future: who controls the present controls the past” from the novel “1984”. That is why the progressive Marxist want to re-write history, so they can control the future. And with Marxists that means total totalitarian control. To them Socialism is only a temporary railroad stop on the train to totalitarian Communism with the elitist progressives in charge and controlling every aspect of your life.

See this excellent new, short, must-read, easy to read book that discusses a dozen or so of the political philosophers and communists past and present (including Obama and Soros) who are behind all this directly, or indirectly via their progressive disciples: “Who Was Karl Marx?: The Men, the Motives and the Menace Behind Today’s Rampaging American Left” —

This book is a must read if you want to understand where all the plans, ideas, tactics, and strategy of the far-left came from. What is happening now is not by accident. This book clearly shows that. See my review of this important new book at the link below. Get a copy, read it, and share it with friends and associates:

Read the article about NARA’s new warning tag on the founding era documents here:

CDR Charles Kerchner, P.E. (Retired)
Lehigh Valley PA USA

National Archives Caught Altering Microfilm Records of Hawaii Arrival Records For August 2 – 7, 1961

Click on image to learn about Obama's crimes and fraud
Click on image to learn about Obama’s crimes and fraud

National Archives Caught Altering Microfilm Records of Hawaii Arrival Records For August 2 – 7, 1961

WASHINGTON D.C. – The multifaceted litigation that Montgomery Blair Sibley has initiated in an attempt to get to the truth regarding the birth records of Barack Hussein Obama II has both produced fruit and met judicial stonewalling.

Yesterday, Sibley filed an Emergency Second Motion for Order to Release Privacy Act Protected Records. That motion presented photographic evidence to Judge Bates that someone has tampered with the evidence related to Obama’s putative birth in Hawaii on August 4, 1961. Sibley had subpoena from the National Archives the “Arrival Records” for August 1 through August 10, 1961, of all passengers arriving in Honolulu, Hawaii to see if records existed that Obama and his mother arrived in Hawaii during that time frame. What NARA produced were two microfilm spools of the arrival records for July 28 through August 1, 1961 and August 8 through August 12, 1961. As detailed in the Emergency Motion, the original date on the box of “August 7” has been altered by “white-out” and a new date of “August 1” had been written on the box. Proof of that alteration comes from a photograph of the same box taken nine months earlier which reveals the date was originally “August 7”. Thus, indisputably the box has been tampered with – a criminal offense – to hide the fact that the microfilm for the August 2 through August 7, 1961 arrivals is now missing.

Read more here:

Also read – Barack Obama and the Communist Party:     Article in Russian Newspaper Pravda Agrees – Obama is a Communist:

# # # #

Also, read more about Obama’s ID crimes and his constitutional ineligibility here:

When will we return to the rule of law and enforce our identity theft protection laws and the U.S. Constitution in regards to the usurper and Fraud-in-Chief residing in the White House?

CDR Charles Kerchner, P.E. (Retired)
Lehigh Valley PA USA

Rick Santorum Still Refusing to Provide Copies of Naturalization Papers Proving His Father was a U.S. Citizen When Rick was Born

Is Rick Santorum a Natural Born Citizen of the United States to Constitutional Standards?

Rick Santorum Still Refusing to Provide Copies of Naturalization Papers Proving His Father was a U.S. Citizen When Rick was Born

Many, many contacts over several months by many people to Rick Santorum’s campaign offices by telephone, letters, and email … and even to his home address in VA via registered postal mail with questions about how, where, and when his father Aldo Santorum [who was born in Italy to non-U.S. Citizen parents] became a US. Citizen, have gone unanswered.  Rick it is a simple question and the public has the right to know. When, if he did, did your immigrant father Aldo who came to the USA as a young lad from Italy naturalize? Provide a copy of the paperwork of same to the American electorate.

Rick Santorum has been asked repeatedly to provide copies to the public of his father’s Citizenship papers. The questions to Rick Santorum have gone repeatedly ignored and unanswered.  Why?  This evasive behavior on this subject by Rick Santorum reminds me of the same type of behavior by Marco Rubio. See the prior story about Marco Rubio and ultimately what we learned as to why he was evading answering the citizenship status of his parents and when they became U.S. Citizens in relation to Marco’s birth date.

Thus, given Rick Santorum’s similar evasive behavior over a lengthy period of time in his not answering the questions and providing copies of the citizenship papers for his father Aldo Santorum, if they exist, to show when Aldo Santorum naturalized as a U.S. Citizen, we have begun to dig in earnest to find the answers.  We constitutionalists who firmly believe that the “natural born Citizen” clause in the U.S. Constitution is very important and applies to all.  We believe that all candidates for the office of President and Vice President need to publicly prove that status, i.e., that they were born in the USA to two (born or naturalized) U.S. Citizen parents given what we have discovered about the person now residing in the Oval Office.  Thus since Rick Santorum is not being forthcoming, we have begun the paper trail research in the various archives to get the facts that Rick Santorum refuses to provide willingly.  Why Rick Santorum is making things so difficult for we in the American electorate and is not being transparent and open and giving the public the information they ask for on this matter is beyond me.  Come on Rick, provide the information and supporting paperwork voluntarily.  However, in the meantime, I hereby share an initial report of what we found or should I say what we did not find in the NARA naturalization records search for PA and West Virginia, which is where his father lived up until Rick was born, to our knowledge:

Here is a copy of an emailed report of what I received in Feb 2012 from the regional office of the national archives (NARA) in Philadelphia PA.

 Rick Santorum says he is the “true conservative” and that he strongly supports the U.S. Constitution.  Well, if that is true, he cannot just ignore Article II Section 1, the presidential eligibility clause, i.e., the “natural born Citizen” requirement to be the President and Commander in Chief.  I strongly urge Rick Santorum to voluntarily release the records concerning how, where, and when his father Aldo Santorum became a U.S. Citizen, if he did. The same data for his grandfather Pietro Santorum, who was also an immigrant from Italy and was born in Italy to non-U.S. Citizen parents, would also be helpful and I encourage Rick to release those citizenship papers if they exist too.

Does the proven lack of “natural born Citizen” of the United States status by several nationally promoted Republican candidates for President and/or Vice President explain why the Republican National Committee and Party and their conservative allies in the media have not said a word about Obama’s clear cut lack of “natural born Citizen” status and the criminal acts to cover that up by Obama?  Are these Republican and so called conservative allies in the media allowing Obama to destroy the Constitution and Republic all for personal political gain of their party?  If so, what does that say about their being “true conservatives” as some so publicly claim?

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
Lehigh Valley PA USA

%d bloggers like this: