U.S. Constitutional Article II Presidential Eligibility Expert, Attorney Mario Apuzzo is in the Hospital with CoVID-19 and Pneumonia. He is in the CentraState Health Care System Hospital in Freehold NJ. When I called the hospital they told me he was currently in the ICU “Step Down” Unit #18. He cannot be visited or contacted at this time. I ask all who read this to extend your thoughts and prayers for Mario and his family and pray for his quick recovery and return to full health.
CDR Charles Kerchner, P.E. (Retired) Lehigh Valley PA USA
My comment: So NARA now considers historical documents, including the U.S. Constitution, to be potential harmful speech and thus is discouraging people from reading them with that warning tag. It’s just one more example of the progressive far-left rapidly speeding up its agenda to re-write history, change language and the meaning of words, undermine our traditional family structure and culture, and purge history per the teachings of Antonio Gramsci and others (as exemplified in the novel “1984”) in the last 100+ years in order to undermine and bring down the USA.
Regarding why they work to change and re-define history, remember the quote “”Who controls the past controls the future: who controls the present controls the past” from the novel “1984”. That is why the progressive Marxist want to re-write history, so they can control the future. And with Marxists that means total totalitarian control. To them Socialism is only a temporary railroad stop on the train to totalitarian Communism with the elitist progressives in charge and controlling every aspect of your life.
See this excellent new, short, must-read, easy to read book that discusses a dozen or so of the political philosophers and communists past and present (including Obama and Soros) who are behind all this directly, or indirectly via their progressive disciples: “Who Was Karl Marx?: The Men, the Motives and the Menace Behind Today’s Rampaging American Left” — https://www.amazon.com/Who-Was-Karl-Marx-Rampaging/dp/B096TN7FQG/
A friend sent me this message with the included link to the new movie titled, “NonCompliant Movie” . I am sharing his message and the link to the new movie herein with all of you:
” Interesting recent paper on the great Swiss jurist, Emer de Vattel: “Vattel’s argument that states should be understood as free and independent bodies operating as moral persons in the international sphere is credited with launching a doctrine of sovereignty that hardened national borders against external interference or obligation. It also helped launch one of the world’s first modern states through its influence on the American founding. Vattel’s theory rests upon the critical role of judgment, specifically, the judgment of interests. That doctrine requires that states must always think for themselves, but not only about themselves. Offering some justification for international action, even in the midst of disagreement or war, is what separates civilized from villainous nations. Vattel’s distinctive combination of independence and interests is set within a global community that makes the fate of outsiders the business of every state. Emer de Vattel’s 1758 The Law of Nations is among a select group of works credited with framing the birth of modern internationalism. His writings were pivotal for the American founding and Armitage calls Vattel “the single most globally influential moral and political writer” of the late eighteenth to early nineteenth centuries, saying the period could be considered a “Vattelian moment.” The argument is that for Vattel states are like people first, because they have interests, and second, because they communicate with one another about those interests. State interests not only affirm their independence, they also underwrite interconnectedness through wise diplomacy. The struggle to pin down the requirements of self-interest makes the readiness to communicate one’s position candidly and thoroughly a central lynchpin in the international equation.” To which I say, therefore, “Arizona First and America First!” Read the rest HERE. See Vattel on “natural born Citizen” (driving USC Art II Sec 1 Cl 5 POTUS CINC) HERE. See KrisAnne Hall’s “Non-Compliant Movie” HERE.”
Be sure to watch the very powerful and so, so true and historically accurate new movie “NonCompliant Movie” featuring Krisanne Hall of Liberty First University. I did. This outstanding, free, streaming online, new educational movie about our constitutional republic form of government should be shown as a Lyceum Class in every Middle School, High School, and College.
WHO IS — AND IS NOT — A “NATURAL BORN CITIZEN”? | by Joseph Demaio
(May 16, 2021) — When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for your humble servant to respond to comments in greater detail than allowed in the designated section of P&E posts, a longer post is required. Such is the case with this offering regarding assertions made by those who reject the likely application of Book I, Ch. 19, § 212 of Emmerich de Vattel’s 1758 treatise, “Le Droit des Gens” or “The Law of Nations,” to the proper interpretation of Art. 2, § 1, Cl. 5 of the Constitution, the “natural born Citizen” restriction for the presidency. Here we go again.
Valued P&E readers, that which follows is somewhat convoluted, but given that the issues are less than simple, a more complex explanation is necessitated. Translation (more on that topic later…): keep some of your favorite caffeinated beverages handy. Your humble servant has his can of Dr Pepper nearby. In addition, it is assumed that readers are already possessed of some historical background relating to the issues, since complete treatment of all the interstices of the matter would make this offering much longer. For that, see all of your servant’s prior P&E posts on the topic.