(22 Apr 2023) — Bill O’Reilly on his current ‘No Spin News’ TV show on ‘The First TV‘ streaming TV network bragged on his Thursday show that he “put that birther thing right out the window” back on his 12 Apr 2011 ‘The Factor’ TV show on Fox News. As a key influencer back then, did he help the two major national political parties and the political establishment “put” a key national security term in our U.S. Constitution totally “out the window” with it?
The recent show in which he said that was ‘Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News’ hosted by Bill O’Reilly. It first aired on Thursday 20 Apr 2023 and was re-aired on Saturday 22 Apr 2023.
O’Reilly’s show airs on The First TV streaming TV network and service. You can listen to the show on podcast via his show playlist at this link: https://www.thefirsttv.com/podcast/
Look for the show dated 20 Apr 2023 which is about 46 minutes long and which title starts with “An Interview with House Speaker … “. The show covered multiple subjects. It first aired on Thursday 20 Apr 2023 and was re-aired Saturday 22 Apr 2023.
A little more than half way into the show, O’Reilly started discussing statements made by Maureen Dowd in her recent column in the NY Times about the “racist birthers”. And as part of discussing the NY Times and Dowd’s column, O’Reilly made his statement about “that birther thing” starting at about 26 minutes 25 seconds into the show.
See this link for the short audio clip I captured where he said it: http://www.kerchner.com/audio/Bill-O’Reill-y-Says-On-No-Spin-News-Show–He-Threw-Birther-Thing–Out-The-Window-In-2011.mp3
I personally sent information to him back in Apr 2011 when he first made that claim on his show The Factor on the Fox News Network. And likewise today when his Thursday show was re-aired, and when I heard what he said and he aired that segment from his Fox New show during his The First TV network show, I immediately sent him a tweet disputing his statement of the veracity of the usefulness of those two newspaper ads to prove anything about Obama’s early life narrative and included a link to a suggested narrative to explain to him how those newspaper ads were not dispositive in proving Obama was physically born in Hawaii.
Those ads were actually placed by the Hawaiian Health Department based on information provided to them via the birth registration system. The Hawaiian birth registration laws and process were very loose back then. Those newspaper ads were not and are not primary independent source evidence of a physical birth in Hawaii. They are only evidence of a birth being registered in the Hawaiian Health Department system.
Those newspaper ads are a secondary and dependent piece of information which was totally dependent on what was given to the Hawaii Department of Health. And that department was operating under Hawaiian laws that were very lax as to what they accepted for registration of an alleged birth in Hawaii. No hospital or medical person’s statement was necessary to register birth. Any person could register a birth as occurring in Hawaii. Here is an example for the President of China who was born in China but later obtained a Hawaiian birth certificate: https://imagesofoldhawaii.com/certificate-of-hawaiian-birth/
Here is the link to a suggested narrative article to explain those two newspaper ads and Obama’s duplicitous early life narrative that I first wrote back in 2009, and updated in 2012 and 2019, that I sent to Bill O’Reilly tonight: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2019/12/30/blast-from-the-past-a-suggested-narrative-how-obama-is-born-in-kenya-and-yet-has-a-hawaiian-birth-registration-record-3/
As in the past, I suspect Bill O’Reilly will totally ignore any evidence as to the lack of usefulness of those two newspaper ads to conclusively prove that Obama was physically born in Hawaii since it disputes his personal mindset on the issue and the partial and limited fact finding effort he expressed on air on the Fox News show The Factor back on 12 Apr 2011. He did not explain the birth registration process in Hawaii and how lax they were in 1961 when Obama’s birth was registered as occurring there even though he physically could have been born anywhere in the world under Hawaiian laws in effect at that time. Again, those newspaper ads are not dispositive and not solid proof of anything.
I wonder if Mr. O’Reilly realizes now what he allowed to happen to our country when to use his wording “he helped put the true meaning and original national security intent and purpose of the ‘natural born Citizen‘ term in the presidential eligibility clause of our U.S. Constitution out the window” too.
CDR Charles Kerchner, P.E. (Retired)
P.S. A couple of questions, thoughts, and facts to ponder and think about in the revisiting of history, disinformation, and the re-writing of history regarding the “birther thing” — Question: A historical rewrite example as background –which political party operatives helped found and strongly supported the racist Klu Klux Klan organization and Jim Crow laws? Answer: The Democratic Party. But who do the talking heads in the mainstream media and writers at the NY Times call racist and blame now? Question: Fast forward to late 2007 & early 2008 — which political party operatives floated the now racist labeled and charged “birther” narrative regarding Obama’s true physical place of birth being questioned? Answer: Hillary Clinton’s Democratic Party which was controlled by her campaign operatives in early 2008. But who do the talking heads in the mainstream media and writers at the NY Times call racist and blame now?
P.P.S. Read, download, and print a PDF copy of this White Paper by CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) about the “natural born Citizen” term and presidential eligibility clause in Article II of our U.S. Constitution here: http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/The-Who-What-When-Where-Why-and-How-of-NBC-Term-in-Constitution.pdf and/or get a copy of my new book on the constitutional term “Natural Born Citizen” via: http://www.kerchner.com/books/naturalborncitizen.htm
You must be logged in to post a comment.