Who Was The Original “Birther”? It Was Barack Hussein Obama II Himself!

Who Was The Original “Birther”? It Was Barack Hussein Obama II Himself!

The biography in the 1991 pamphlet published by the Acton and Dystel literary agency promoting Obama’s 1991 book “Journeys in Black and White” stated Barack Obama “was born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii”. Said early life details are always provided by the author to his agent. The Obama biography in subsequent editions of the pamphlets (with various life accomplishment updates) continued to say he was “born in Kenya” for 17 years until Obama entered the race for President and his backers and enabling media started the “clean up ” and online purge of his previous self-promoting early life-narrative statements. Then it was changed to remove the born in Kenya statement. So Obama was the first “Birther”!
See this news story for more on this pamphlet:
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2012/05/17/The-Vetting-Barack-Obama-Literary-Agent-1991-Born-in-Kenya-Raised-Indonesia-Hawaii/
Download a copy of this advertorial published 18 April 2011 in The Washington Times National Weekly Edition at this link: https://www.scribd.com/doc/53259902/What-U-S-Pres-in-History-Has-Multiple-Sources-in-Foreign-Country-Saying-He-Was-Born-There

And then when Hillary Clinton’s campaign operatives saw Obama getting traction in the polls, they started, seeded, fertilized, and gave deep roots to what became the “Birther Movement” during late 2007 & early 2008 by surreptitiously spreading information that Obama was foreign born, i.e., that Obama was “born in Indonesia” in some forums or “born in Kenya” in others and also mentioning his Muslim education and roots and allegations Obama’s secret second middle name was Mohammad. They were scattering political seeds to the political winds to see what took root and flourished at that time to stop Obama’s rising in the polls.

Her campaign and backers continued that surreptitious “Obama was foreign born” and “Obama secretly was a Muslim” campaign until Hillary under heavy pressure sold out to Obama in the summer of 2008 at that secret meeting they had together. That meeting was apparently arranged by big money left-wing Democratic Party donors and Obama’s backers and operatives where Hillary was “made an offer she could not refuse”. Hillary saw her campaign funding was drying up and it was deeply in debt. Obama was now the “anointed one” by the far, far-left big money in the U.S. and with money even flowing in under the table from foreign sources. The big, far-left money and their comrades in the mainstream media and the deep state had made it clear to Hillary before that secret meeting and more emphatically at it, that she had to get out of the way or else.

Was it monetary offers to be given immediately up front such as paying off Hillary’s multi-million dollars of campaign debt combined with other offers dangled before her for the future enrichment of the Clinton’s such as the offer of the (as it turned out very lucrative) Secretary of State job with its eventual pay-to-play payoff scheme opportunities that Hillary and Bill utilized to the hilt with the Clinton Foundation? Remember the Uranium One deal as one example of what transpired with that opportunity for future payoffs opened up to the Clinton’s by her stepping aside and taking the Secretary of State job offered. And then there was Haitian Aide corruption scandal as another example. Or was it not just all carrots offered but some very big sticks wielded and revealed to her at that secret meeting that Obama had a lot more “Opposition Research” damaging dirt on Hillary and Bill Clinton than they had on Obama?

However the Birther Movement that Hillary’s operatives surreptitiously seeded and fertilized could not be stopped even though Hillary now wanted it to stop and she distanced herself ever more vocally publicly from it, as too many inconvenient facts surfaced as a result of independent investigations by “others” which were triggered by the Birther Movement such as Obama’s forged “short born” Certification of Live Birth and other facts continually surfacing over time that pointed to criminal identity fraud by Obama and also Obama’s lack of constitutional eligibility for the high office he sought.

As a result of Obama’s star rising and Hillary’s fading in the first half of 2008, many of Hillary’s operatives not wanting to see Hillary cut off at the knees by the Democratic Party big money donors increasingly favoring Obama over Hillary, formed a group called PUMA . Later some of that group split off and changed the meaning of the acronym of PUMA to one more politically correct to be used for fund raising,and continued the anti-Obama surreptitious operation for many months and were subsequently joined by others who saw Obama as a threat to our very nation.

But as time went on, and the need to coverup Hillary’s campaign’s role in surreptitiously spreading and planting rumors about Obama’s questionable early life narrative and birth place location since Hillary sold out and joined the Obama team, it was only the “others” who were blamed for starting it all.

Using revisionist history tactics orchestrated by the first birther Obama himself, his campaign, the “birther-apple-seed” spreading operatives from the former Hillary campaign after she joined Obama’s team, who at that point in time were totally dening any role in it, and of course with the help the totally enabling mainstream media, the “others” were blamed for starting the rumors, when they clearly did not.

As has clearly been shown here, it was not the “others” but Obama himself via well documented evidence from at least the year 1991 until and including the year 2007, and reportedly long before 1991, saying he was born in Kenya. And then Hillary’s campaign operatives in late 2007 and early 2008 picked up on it and were the root cause of the growing “Birther Movement” and “Obama is foreign born” statements and issues surfacing in the first half of 2008. Then when no longer politically useful to either of them they wanted it all to go away and to blame “others” using a revisionist history of events totally enabled by the mainstream media, their socialist comrades in arms, to deceive the American electorate about the truth about who Obama really was and was not (he was not constitutionally eligible for the office he sought) and what he represented – a deep threat to our constitutional republic. But too many Obama life narrative lies, identity fraud, and use of a stolen SSN had been exposed by that time to have it just go away.

Watch this video at the following link and also then read the news story at ThePostEmail newspaper about those events: https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=XwSw9O0agGI

But no matter where Barack Hussein Obama II was born, since he was born a dual national and a dual citizen with innate divided loyalties at and by birth, i.e., by owing allegiance at birth to two countries England via his British (Colony of Kenya) foreign national father and U.S. via his mother (although there are doubts about her ability to do so if Obama was foreign born because of her young age), he was NOT constitutionally eligible to serve as President and Commander in Chief of our military since he was NOT a “natural born Citizen” of the United States. Obama was not born with sole allegiance at birth to the USA and only the USA. Thus he was not and is not constitutionally eligible to be the President and Commander in Chief of our military. He was a usurper.

CDR Charles Kerchner, P.E. (Retired)
http://www.kerchner.com/books/naturalborncitizen.htm
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com
http://www.scribd.com/user/52640192/protectourliberty/lists
http://www.protectourliberty.org

Other suggested reading and viewing on being a “natural born Citizen” of the United States:

1. Buy and then read my new book, “Natural Born Citizen” via: http://www.kerchner.com/books/catalog.htm … or … http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0C3YD377J/genealogicalrese

2. Read, download, and print a PDF copy of this White Paper by CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) about the “natural born Citizen” term and presidential eligibility clause in Article II of our U.S. Constitution here: http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/The-Who-What-When-Where-Why-and-How-of-NBC-Term-in-Constitution.pdf

3.  A chart which lists and explains the five (5) Citizenship terms used in the U.S. Constitution:  http://www.scribd.com/doc/11737124/Citizenship-Terms-Used-in-the-US-Constitution-The-5-Terms-Defined-Some-Legal-Reference-to-Same

4. Being a “born Citizen” or “Citizen at Birth” is not identically the same as a being a “natural born Citizen”:  https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2009/07/16/citizen-at-birth-cab-does-not-equal-natural-born-citizen-nbc-obama-is-not-a-natural-born-citizen-of-the-usa-2/   or   http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/citizen-at-birth-cab-does-not-equal.html

5. Read this essay regarding the constitutional term “natural born Citizen” and basic logic, i.e., trees are plants but not all plants are trees. “Natural born Citizens” are a subset of “born Citizens (citizens at birth)”. Adjectives mean something.  All “natural born Citizens” are “born Citizens (citizens at birth) but not all “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” are “natural born Citizens”:  https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/06/20/of-natural-born-citizens-and-citizens-at-birth-and-basic-logic-trees-are-plants-but-not-all-plants-are-trees-natural-born-citizens-nbc-are-citizens-at-birth-cab-but-not-all-cab/ 

6. A Euler Diagram which logically shows the kinds of U.S. Citizens and their set and subset relationships: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2018/06/16/natural-born-citizen/

7. The “Three Legged Stool Test” for being a Natural Born Citizen: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2013/11/15/the-three-legged-stool-test-analogy-for-natural-born-citizenship-of-the-united-states-to-constitutional-standards/

8. Article II Presidential Eligibility Facts:  http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html  or  https://www.scribd.com/document/161994312/Article-II-Presidential-Eligibility-Facts 

9. Watch these videos (Parts I and II) by the renowned constitutional scholar Dr. Herb Titus: http://www.kerchner.com/videos/natural-born-citizen-part-1-by-dr-herb-titus.mp4   and  http://www.kerchner.com/videos/natural-born-citizen-part-2-by-dr-herb-titus.mp4

10. Read the dozen of legal essays and court briefs written by constitutional and citizenship expert Attorney Mario Apuzzo on being a “natural born Citizen of the United States” and the pretenders and usurpers in three major political parties (Democrat, Republican, and Socialist parties) – who invalidly claimed such birth status – at his legal blog:  http://puzo1.blogspot.com

11. Read online or download and save dozens of historical papers and articles written over time, some over 200 years ago, describing what a “natural born Citizen” of the United States is to constitutional standards:  https://www.scribd.com/lists/3301209/Papers-Discussing-Natural-Born-Citizen-Meaning-to-Constitutional-Standards

Advertisement

Bill O’Reilly on His Current ‘No Spin News’ Show Says He ‘Put That Birther Thing Right Out The Window’ on His 12 Apr 2011 ‘The Factor’ Show on Fox News

(22 Apr 2023) — Bill O’Reilly on his current ‘No Spin News’ TV show on ‘The First TV‘ streaming TV network bragged on his Thursday show that he “put that birther thing right out the window” back on his 12 Apr 2011 ‘The Factor’ TV show on Fox News. As a key influencer back then, did he help the two major national political parties and the political establishment “put” a key national security term in our U.S. Constitution totally “out the window” with it?

The recent show in which he said that was ‘Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News’ hosted by Bill O’Reilly. It first aired on Thursday 20 Apr 2023 and was re-aired on Saturday 22 Apr 2023.

O’Reilly’s show airs on The First TV streaming TV network and service. You can listen to the show on podcast via his show playlist at this link: https://www.thefirsttv.com/podcast/

Look for the show dated 20 Apr 2023 which is about 46 minutes long and which title starts with “An Interview with House Speaker … “. The show covered multiple subjects. It first aired on Thursday 20 Apr 2023 and was re-aired Saturday 22 Apr 2023.

A little more than half way into the show, O’Reilly started discussing statements made by Maureen Dowd in her recent column in the NY Times about the “racist birthers”. And as part of discussing the NY Times and Dowd’s column, O’Reilly made his statement about “that birther thing” starting at about 26 minutes 25 seconds into the show.

See this link for the short audio clip I captured where he said it: http://www.kerchner.com/audio/Bill-O’Reill-y-Says-On-No-Spin-News-Show–He-Threw-Birther-Thing–Out-The-Window-In-2011.mp3

I personally sent information to him back in Apr 2011 when he first made that claim on his show The Factor on the Fox News Network. And likewise today when his Thursday show was re-aired, and when I heard what he said and he aired that segment from his Fox New show during his The First TV network show, I immediately sent him a tweet disputing his statement of the veracity of the usefulness of those two newspaper ads to prove anything about Obama’s early life narrative and included a link to a suggested narrative to explain to him how those newspaper ads were not dispositive in proving Obama was physically born in Hawaii.

Those ads were actually placed by the Hawaiian Health Department based on information provided to them via the birth registration system. The Hawaiian birth registration laws and process were very loose back then. Those newspaper ads were not and are not primary independent source evidence of a physical birth in Hawaii. They are only evidence of a birth being registered in the Hawaiian Health Department system.

Those newspaper ads are a secondary and dependent piece of information which was totally dependent on what was given to the Hawaii Department of Health. And that department was operating under Hawaiian laws that were very lax as to what they accepted for registration of an alleged birth in Hawaii. No hospital or medical person’s statement was necessary to register birth. Any person could register a birth as occurring in Hawaii. Here is an example for the President of China who was born in China but later obtained a Hawaiian birth certificate: https://imagesofoldhawaii.com/certificate-of-hawaiian-birth/

Here is the link to a suggested narrative article to explain those two newspaper ads and Obama’s duplicitous early life narrative that I first wrote back in 2009, and updated in 2012 and 2019, that I sent to Bill O’Reilly tonight: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2019/12/30/blast-from-the-past-a-suggested-narrative-how-obama-is-born-in-kenya-and-yet-has-a-hawaiian-birth-registration-record-3/

As in the past, I suspect Bill O’Reilly will totally ignore any evidence as to the lack of usefulness of those two newspaper ads to conclusively prove that Obama was physically born in Hawaii since it disputes his personal mindset on the issue and the partial and limited fact finding effort he expressed on air on the Fox News show The Factor back on 12 Apr 2011. He did not explain the birth registration process in Hawaii and how lax they were in 1961 when Obama’s birth was registered as occurring there even though he physically could have been born anywhere in the world under Hawaiian laws in effect at that time. Again, those newspaper ads are not dispositive and not solid proof of anything.

I wonder if Mr. O’Reilly realizes now what he allowed to happen to our country when to use his wording “he helped put the true meaning and original national security intent and purpose of the ‘natural born Citizen‘ term in the presidential eligibility clause of our U.S. Constitution out the window” too.

CDR Charles Kerchner, P.E. (Retired)
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com
http://www.scribd.com/user/52640192/protectourliberty/lists
http://www.protectourliberty.org

P.S. A couple of questions, thoughts, and facts to ponder and think about in the revisiting of history, disinformation, and the re-writing of history regarding the “birther thing” — Question: A historical rewrite example as background –which political party operatives helped found and strongly supported the racist Klu Klux Klan organization and Jim Crow laws? Answer: The Democratic Party. But who do the talking heads in the mainstream media and writers at the NY Times call racist and blame now? Question: Fast forward to late 2007 & early 2008 — which political party operatives floated the now racist labeled and charged “birther” narrative regarding Obama’s true physical place of birth being questioned? Answer: Hillary Clinton’s Democratic Party which was controlled by her campaign operatives in early 2008. But who do the talking heads in the mainstream media and writers at the NY Times call racist and blame now?

P.P.S. Read, download, and print a PDF copy of this White Paper by CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) about the “natural born Citizen” term and presidential eligibility clause in Article II of our U.S. Constitution here: http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/The-Who-What-When-Where-Why-and-How-of-NBC-Term-in-Constitution.pdf and/or get a copy of my new book on the constitutional term “Natural Born Citizen” via: http://www.kerchner.com/books/naturalborncitizen.htm

Is This What the Deep State Truly Fears? | by Sharon Rondeau

Is This What the Deep State Truly Fears? | by Sharon Rondeau | @ ThePost&Email

IN A SECOND TERM, WOULD TRUMP INVESTIGATE OBAMA’S “DOCUMENTS?”

(Feb. 26, 2020) — On Wednesday afternoon, citizen researcher, blogger and retired Navy Commander Charles F. Kerchner, Jr. tweeted to President Trump’s personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, his thoughts on the “Deep State” and any potential probe the president might order into the findings that Barack Obama’s “long-form” birth certificate and Selective Service registration form are fraudulent.

“One of [the] major reasons the Deep State is after Trump is because he was questioning Obama’s pres[idential] eligibility & missing birth certificate,” Kerchner tweeted to Giuliani, who has been researching what he alleges is massive corruption involving the Obama regime, Ukraine, China and possibly other countries.

“Trump was labeled a Birther,” Kerchner noted in his tweet.  “They fear Trump will some day investigate Obama key forged ID docs…”

Over a period of months in early 2011, Trump publicly called for Obama to release his original birth record to prove his constitutional eligibility to serve as president, leading the White House on April 27 that year to post an image said to represent Obama’s “long-form” birth certificate from Hawaii.

During the Obama years, The New York Times and other mainstream outlets as a bloc adopted and applied the term “birther” to anyone questioning Obama’s birthplace or eligibility, including Trump.  Many Americans harbored doubts as to Obama’s eligibility in response to conflicting articles, many from the very same newsrooms [click here for examples], reporting Obama as having been born in Indonesia or Kenya and not Hawaii, as he claims.  …

continue reading at:  https://www.thepostemail.com/2020/02/26/is-this-what-the-deep-state-truly-fears/

# # # #

CDR Charles Kerchner, P.E. (Retired)
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com
http://www.scribd.com/user/52640192/protectourliberty/lists
http://www.protectourliberty.org

Other suggested reading and viewing on being a “natural born Citizen” of the United States:

1.  A chart which lists and explains the five (5) Citizenship terms used in the U.S. Constitution.

2. Being a “born Citizen” or “Citizen at Birth” is not identically the same as a being a “natural born Citizen”.

3. Read this essay regarding the constitutional term “natural born Citizen” and basic logic, i.e., trees are plants but not all plants are trees. “Natural born Citizens” are a subset of “born Citizens (citizens at birth)”. Adjectives mean something.  All “natural born Citizens” are “born Citizens (citizens at birth) but not all “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” are “natural born Citizens”:  https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/06/20/of-natural-born-citizens-and-citizens-at-birth-and-basic-logic-trees-are-plants-but-not-all-plants-are-trees-natural-born-citizens-nbc-are-citizens-at-birth-cab-but-not-all-cab/ 

4. A Euler Diagram which logically shows the kinds of U.S. Citizens and their set and subset relationships: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2018/06/16/natural-born-citizen/

5. The “Three Legged Stool Test” for being a Natural Born Citizen: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2013/11/15/the-three-legged-stool-test-analogy-for-natural-born-citizenship-of-the-united-states-to-constitutional-standards/

6. Article II Presidential Eligibility Facts:  http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html  or  https://www.scribd.com/document/161994312/Article-II-Presidential-Eligibility-Facts 

7. Watch these videos (Parts I and II) by the renowned constitutional scholar Dr. Herb Titus: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esiZZ-1R7e8  and  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoaZ8WextxQ

8. Read, download, and print a PDF copy of this White Paper by CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) about the “natural born Citizen” term and presidential eligibility clause in Article II of our U.S. Constitution here: http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/The-Who-What-When-Where-Why-and-How-of-NBC-Term-in-Constitution.pdf

YouTube Bans Videos on “Eligibility,” “Birtherism”

YouTube Bans Videos on “Eligibility,” “Birtherism”| by Sharon Rondeau | ThePostEmail.com

YouTube Bans Videos on “Eligibility,” “Birtherism”

The above is a must read article by Sharon Rondeau at ThePostEmail.com.  And the question that first popped in my mind when I saw this AP story in the Business Section of my local newspaper was … why now?  First: Why is YouTube doing this now.  Second: Why did the Associated Press decide to pump out a nationwide news story with Birtherism in the headline? In my opinion, the social engineers who manipulate public opinion are afraid of something going on in the background that is not being reported by the main stream media and are out and about on the eligibility and birther issues to try and keep the beach ball of persistent questions and the truth on those two issues suppressed and submerged below the water surface of public opinion. What is wrong about questioning the constitutional eligibility of a political candidate? What is happening to political free speech in our country?

CDR Charles Kerchner, P.E. (Retired)
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com
http://www.scribd.com/user/52640192/protectourliberty/lists
http://www.protectourliberty.org

Other suggested reading and viewing on being a “natural born Citizen” of the United States:

1.  A chart which lists and explains the five (5) Citizenship terms used in the U.S. Constitution.

2. Being a “born Citizen” or “Citizen at Birth” is not identically the same as a being a “natural born Citizen”.

3. Read this essay regarding the constitutional term “natural born Citizen” and basic logic, i.e., trees are plants but not all plants are trees. “Natural born Citizens” are a subset of “born Citizens (citizens at birth)”. Adjectives mean something.  All “natural born Citizens” are “born Citizens (citizens at birth) but not all “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” are “natural born Citizens”:  https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/06/20/of-natural-born-citizens-and-citizens-at-birth-and-basic-logic-trees-are-plants-but-not-all-plants-are-trees-natural-born-citizens-nbc-are-citizens-at-birth-cab-but-not-all-cab/ 

4. A Euler Diagram which logically shows the kinds of U.S. Citizens and their set and subset relationships: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2018/06/16/natural-born-citizen/

5. The “Three Legged Stool Test” for being a Natural Born Citizen: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2013/11/15/the-three-legged-stool-test-analogy-for-natural-born-citizenship-of-the-united-states-to-constitutional-standards/

6. Article II Presidential Eligibility Facts:  http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html  or  https://www.scribd.com/document/161994312/Article-II-Presidential-Eligibility-Facts 

7. Watch these videos (Parts I and II) by the renowned constitutional scholar Dr. Herb Titus: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esiZZ-1R7e8  and  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoaZ8WextxQ

8. Read, download, and print a PDF copy of this White Paper by CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) about the “natural born Citizen” term and presidential eligibility clause in Article II of our U.S. Constitution here: http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/The-Who-What-When-Where-Why-and-How-of-NBC-Term-in-Constitution.pdf

%d bloggers like this: