CDR Kerchner (Ret)'s Blog

April 18, 2012

Breaking News: Obama Lawyers Want the Video of the NJ Obama Ballot Access Challenge Public Hearing Pulled and Suppressed

Click on image to learn more about Obama's naked fraud as to his true legal identity. "The Emperor Has No Clothes", i.e., no conclusively proven true legal identity papers. He is conning the whole world.

Breaking News: Obama Lawyers Want the Video of the NJ Obama Ballot Access Challenge Public Hearing Pulled and Suppressed

I heard this morning that the Obama lawyers are trying to suppress the videos of the NJ Obama Ballot Access Challenge public hearing.  So I called and spoke with Attorney Mario Apuzzo and he confirmed that Obama’s lawyers have called him and told him they are planning to take legal action to get the videos of the NJ Ballot Access Challenge Public Hearing pulled and suppressed. What is the Obama side ashamed of and doesn’t want the world to see.  Could it be that their Obama “emperor has no clothing on”, i.e., has no known conclusively proven true legal identity clothing/papers to show the world which Attorney Mario Apuzzo forced them to admit to and stipulate to in the NJ public hearing?  Obama’s side obviously does not want people to see this video. Watch it yourself at the below links and learn why.

In these videos, the Obama side even wants to allow Mickey Mouse to run for President. To Obama and his lawyers the U.S. Constitution and presidential eligibility clause in Article II is a joke.  You can see that Mickey Mouse reference by Obama’s  Atty Alexandra Hill in Part 2 of the videos beloe at about 40 minutes in to that segment.  It was interesting that Obama’s lawyer chose and mentioned Mickey Mouse running for President and making a mockery of the election process in her statements in the hearing in NJ since according to the 2008 records Mickey Mouse was a contributor to Obama’s campaign in 2008 as part of the untraceable debit and credit card contributions that Obama accepted online, using any name typed in real or not since the card name verification was turned off by Obama’s campaign, presumably to avoid campaign limits per person as one reason for their doing so.  Also it is reported that  a good chunk of the ultimate source of the online donations were alleged to have been illegally provided to Obama operatives from foreign sources who then made the donations online using fictitious names.

Full Video of the NJ Obama Ballot Access Challenge Public Hearing. Under NJ state law, video taping of public hearings is permitted subject to reasonable restrictions by the judge.  And the judge in this hearing allowed the video cameras to record the event.  Now the Obama legal team wants to suppress these videos.  Everyone should download a copy of these videos onto their own personal computer such that the Obama side cannot make these videos disappear from the eyes and ears of the American electorate who can now see the shameful games the Obama lawyers play in court to avoid revealing Obama’s lack of any conclusive proof as to his true legal identity.  See this channel link for the videos of this public hearing and/or via the other embedded links below:  http://www.youtube.com/haggz51

Video of NJ Hearing Part 1:

Video of NJ Hearing Part 2:

Video of NJ Hearing Part 3:

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
Lehigh Valley PA USA
http://www.protectourliberty.org/
http://www.scribd.com/protectourliberty
http://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/

About these ads

12 Comments

  1. [...] More: http://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/04/18/full-video-of-the-nj-obama-ballot-access-challenge-publi… [...]

    Pingback by Flash! Obama Lawyers want NJ ballot challenge hearing videos suppressed! — April 18, 2012 @ 2:44 pm

  2. TOOOOOOOO BAD WHA WHA WHA WHA

    Comment by Joseph Dirt — April 18, 2012 @ 3:12 pm

  3. [...] The New Jersey Administrative Code says that anyone may record a public hearing. The judge may restrict such recording so that it does not disrupt the hearing. On April 10, before the hearing began, Judge Masin summoned Apuzzo and Hill to his chambers. There, as Apuzzo said later, the judge asked about persons wanting to record the hearings on video. Apuzzo knew that CNAV and Dan Haggerty had brought cameras. He had also given an interview to Station WHYY-TV (Channel 12, Philadelphia, PA), who told him they would come to the hearing. Judge Masin said that he would allow video cameras, so long as their operators mounted them on fixed tripod stands. Haggerty and CNAV agreed to this. (See also Commander Kerchner’s blog entry.) [...]

    Pingback by Obama eligibility: media pressure - Conservative News and Views — April 18, 2012 @ 3:56 pm

  4. [...] ###UPDATE: April 18th, 2012 Source: CDR Kerchner (Ret)’s BlogObama Lawyers Want the Video of the NJ Obama Ballot Access Challenge Public Hearing Pulled and [...]

    Pingback by Obama Lawyer Admits Forgery but disregards “image” as Indication of Obama’s Ineligibility Damage Control — April 18, 2012 @ 6:35 pm

  5. Excellent article, Sir.

    Comment by Dabigragu — April 18, 2012 @ 7:22 pm

  6. hahahaha, tell em to look all over the web and on Youtube, they can find dozens/hundreds of copies there!

    The dam has sprung a leak and gates are ready to bust WIDE OPEN!

    Bye Bye Barry!

    Comment by KenyanBornObamAcorn (@KenyanBornObama) — April 18, 2012 @ 9:50 pm

  7. [...] To top it off, Obama’s lawyers have accused Apuzzo of having CNAV illegally record the hearing when in reality all public court hearings are allowed to be filmed. The New Jersey Administrative Code says that anyone may record a public hearing. The judge may restrict such recording so that it does not disrupt the hearing. On April 10, before the hearing began, Judge Masin summoned Apuzzo and Hill to his chambers. There, as Apuzzo said later, the judge asked about persons wanting to record the hearings on video. Apuzzo knew that CNAV and Dan Haggerty had brought cameras. He had also given an interview to Station WHYY-TV (Channel 12, Philadelphia, PA), who told him they would come to the hearing. Judge Masin said that he would allow video cameras, so long as their operators mounted them on fixed tripod stands. Haggerty and CNAV agreed to this. (See also Commander Kerchner’s blog entry.) [...]

    Pingback by Obama’s Lawyers Move to Censor Videos of New Jersey Ballot Challenge Hearing, Rewrite History : — April 20, 2012 @ 1:53 pm

  8. [...] [...]

    Pingback by Anonymous — April 21, 2012 @ 7:27 am

  9. [...] them on fixed tripod stands. Haggerty and CNAV agreed to this. (See also Commander Kerchner’s blog entry.)The lawyers representing Obama are clearly attempting to re write history by claiming that the [...]

    Pingback by Barack Obama's citizenship questioned - Page 492 - ALIPAC — April 21, 2012 @ 7:28 am

  10. [...] To top it off, Obama’s lawyers have accused Apuzzo of having CNAV illegally record the hearing when in reality all public court hearings are allowed to be filmed. The New Jersey Administrative Code says that anyone may record a public hearing. The judge may restrict such recording so that it does not disrupt the hearing. On April 10, before the hearing began, Judge Masin summoned Apuzzo and Hill to his chambers. There, as Apuzzo said later, the judge asked about persons wanting to record the hearings on video. Apuzzo knew that CNAV and Dan Haggerty had brought cameras. He had also given an interview to Station WHYY-TV (Channel 12, Philadelphia, PA), who told him they would come to the hearing. Judge Masin said that he would allow video cameras, so long as their operators mounted them on fixed tripod stands. Haggerty and CNAV agreed to this. (See also Commander Kerchner’s blog entry.) [...]

    Pingback by Obama’s Lawyers Move to Censor Videos of New Jersey Ballot Challenge Hearing, Rewrite History – John Malcolm — April 21, 2012 @ 9:58 am

  11. [...] To top it off, Obama’s lawyers have accused Apuzzo of having CNAV illegally record the hearing when in reality all public court hearings are allowed to be filmed. The New Jersey Administrative Code says that anyone may record a public hearing. The judge may restrict such recording so that it does not disrupt the hearing. On April 10, before the hearing began, Judge Masin summoned Apuzzo and Hill to his chambers. There, as Apuzzo said later, the judge asked about persons wanting to record the hearings on video. Apuzzo knew that CNAV and Dan Haggerty had brought cameras. He had also given an interview to Station WHYY-TV (Channel 12, Philadelphia, PA), who told him they would come to the hearing. Judge Masin said that he would allow video cameras, so long as their operators mounted them on fixed tripod stands. Haggerty and CNAV agreed to this. (See also Commander Kerchner’s blog entry.) [...]

    Pingback by Obama’s OWN Lawyers CONFIRM His Ineligibility AND That His Birth Certificate Is A FORGERY! | Breaking Intel — April 21, 2012 @ 11:02 am

  12. [...] The New Jersey Administrative Code says that anyone may record a public hearing. The judge may restrict such recording so that it does not disrupt the hearing. On April 10, before the hearing began, Judge Masin summoned Apuzzo and Hill to his chambers. There, as Apuzzo said later, the judge asked about persons wanting to record the hearings on video. Apuzzo knew that CNAV and Dan Haggerty had brought cameras. He had also given an interview to Station WHYY-TV (Channel 12, Philadelphia, PA), who told him they would come to the hearing. Judge Masin said that he would allow video cameras, so long as their operators mounted them on fixed tripod stands. Haggerty and CNAV agreed to this. (See also Commander Kerchner’s blog entry.) [...]

    Pingback by Obama’s Lawyers Move to Censor Videos of New Jersey Ballot Challenge Hearing, Rewrite History | | Shift FrequencyShift Frequency — April 21, 2012 @ 2:39 pm


RSS feed for comments on this post.

The Rubric Theme. Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,171 other followers

%d bloggers like this: