(23 Dec 2020) — The United States Supreme Court has flagrantly violated its Rules, and it is now claiming not to know where my papers and $300 check are, even though they received all papers on December 4, 2020, proved by my time-stamped copy.
The case analyst I spoke with today, a short tempered insulting individual, also tried to convince me there was a Supreme Court Rule preventing me from filing the case. When pressed to cite the Rule, he could not do so. Because there is no such Rule.
I filed exactly as required by Rule 17.4, and that Rule says the case “will be docketed” when forty copies and $300 are received. Those were received at the Court on December 4th. They have been holding my $300 check for three weeks.
(Dec 15, 2020) – BREAKING NEWS:THE WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT JUST GAVE ITS LEGISLATURE COVER TO INVESTIGATE ILLEGAL VOTES
Yesterday, the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled that the election for presidential electors was illegally handled by Wisconsin Election Officials, and the Court indicated that all votes by persons claiming to be “indefinitely confined”, must be determined on a case by case basis:
“¶40 Accordingly, we conclude that the Respondents’ interpretation of Wisconsin’s election laws is erroneous. Additionally, we conclude that Emergency Order #12 did not render all Wisconsin electors ‘indefinitely confined,’ thereby obviating the requirement of a valid photo identification to obtain an absentee ballot.”
(Oct. 8, 2020) — On September 28, the organization Rural & Red Political Action Committee (PAC) of Clarksville, VA filed a “Complaint for Declaratory Judgment” in the Mecklenburg County, VA Circuit Court naming Chairman of the Virginia State Board of Elections Robert H. Brink, Esq. as defendant as to the question of whether or not he properly vetted Democratic vice-presidential candidate Kamala Harris’s constitutional eligibility to serve in that capacity should she and running-mate Joseph R. Biden win the November 3 election.
Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution requires that the president and commander-in-chief be a “natural born Citizen,” and the 12th Amendment mandates that a vice-presidential candidate meet all of the requirements for president.
Rural & Red President Harold Gielow, a 22-year Marine veteran, writer and non-lawyer, is listed on the case as “Plaintiff 2” and will be presenting his argument unassisted, he told us in an interview on Wednesday. When we asked him his reason for launching the lawsuit, he replied, “I served as a United States Marine officer for 22 years and I swore to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States, foreign and domestic, for 22 years, and I took it seriously, and I believe our Constitution is being trampled.” … continue reading at: https://www.thepostemail.com/2020/10/08/virginia-lawsuit-seeks-court-judgment-on-election-officers-vetting-of-kamala-harris/
The parties stipulated in the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania that Cruz was born on December 22, 1970, in Calgary, Alberta, Canada; that his mother, Eleanor Darragh, was born on November 23, 1934, in the State of Delaware; that his mother is and has always been a U.S. citizen from the moment of her birth; that at the time of Cruz’s birth, his mother had been physically present in the United States for more than ten years, including at least five years after she reached the age of fourteen; and that Cruz was a citizen at birth.
Elliott filed a petition with the Pennsylvania Secretary of State to set aside the nomination petition of Ted Cruz pursuant to which he sought to appear on the April 26, 2016 primary election ballot for the Office of the President. In his objection, petitioner alleged that given that Cruz was born out of the territory and jurisdiction of the United States, his name should be stricken from the Pennsylvania 2016 primary ballot because he is not a “natural born citizen” within the meaning of Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the United States Constitution.
Cruz filed his opposition, contending that the Elliott’s objection raised a non-justiciable political question. As to the merits, Cruz contended that a person born to at least one U.S. citizen parent, regardless of where the child may be born, if a citizen at birth under any law, is an Article II natural born citizen through inheritance of citizenship from the parent (jus sanguinis) and without needing to be born in the United States (jus soli).
The lower court ruled that the political question doctrine did not apply and then went on to decide the merits of Elliott’s objection. After discussing some articles written by some authorities, the court held that: “Having extensively reviewed all articles cited in this opinion, as well as many others, this Court holds, consistent with the common law precedent and statutory history, that a ‘natural born citizen’ includes any person who is a United States citizen from birth. Accordingly, because he was a citizen of the United States from birth, Ted Cruz is eligible to serve as President of the United States, and the objection filed by Carmen Elliott to the Nomination Petition of Ted Cruz is denied.”
Elliott appealed the Order of the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, which affirmed that Order on March 31, 2016, and also denied Victor William’s Notice to Intervene as Appellant and Elliott’s application for oral argument.
In our Petition to the U.S. Supreme Court, we argue that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has decided an important question of constitutional law concerning the definition of an article II natural born citizen that has not been but should be settled by the U.S. Supreme Court. Having a person sit as President and Commander in Chief of the Military who is not a natural born citizen puts the national security of the United States vitally at risk. Whether or not the President and Commander in Chief is legitimately sitting in those offices impacts the nation’s foreign policy. The nation needs a definition of “natural born citizen” for future presidential and vice presidential elections. Congress, the executive, the political parties, and the voters cannot define a natural born citizen. Only the judiciary can define a natural born citizen. … ”
A Simple Euler Logic Diagram Shows Logical Relationship of “natural born Citizens” to Other Type “Citizens” of the United States. Only a “natural born Citizen” Can Constitutionally be the President and Commander in Chief or the Vice-President. Click on Image For More Information.
More historical and legal papers and analysis on the true constitutional meaning and intent of the founders and framers of the presidential eligibility clause, natural born Citizen, in our U.S. Constitution can be found at this link: http://www.scribd.com/collections/3301209/