Just Uploaded to My SCRIBD Account – TX 2016 Ballot Challenge – Case 16-0148

Click on Texas Flag for more information about "natural born Citizen" and presidential eligibility clause
Click Texas Flag for more info about “natural born Citizen” & eligibility clause

Just uploaded TX Supreme Court 2016 Ballot Challenge re Ineligible Candidates Allowed on TX Ballot for President – Case 16-0148

Read, download, and/or print a copy from this link: 

See the Go Fund Me Account set up to help support and fund this Texas ballot challenge: Learn more about the ballot access challenge in TX and who filed it at the Go Fund Me Link. You can help by making a donation.  Donate to help them fight this legal challenge if you can.  I have. Any amount large or small with help the cause. Make a donation today.  CDR Kerchner (Ret)

# # # #

Cruz and Rubio were Citizens at Birth of a Foreign Country (Ted of 2 Foreign Countries) – Both NOT a “natural born Citizen” of the United States

Get PDF Copy of Cruz Foreign Citizenship Facts Petition Here — Get PDF Copy of Rubio Foreign Citizenship Facts Petition Here

The Who What When Where Why and How of the “natural born Citizen” Term in Our U.S. Constitution

CDR Charles Kerchner, P.E. (Retired)
Lehigh Valley PA USA
http://www.protectourliberty.org/
http://www.scribd.com/protectourliberty/collections/
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/

P.S. Also read — A reminder for people seeking Constitutionally Eligible presidential candidates – There are many of them in the USA. We don’t have to pick dual-Citizens: http://www.scribd.com/doc/160107354/Natural-Born-Citizen-3-Not-4-Leaf-Clover-Type-of-Citizenship

P.P.S. Also read this essay regarding the constitutional term in the presidential eligibility clause “natural born Citizen” and basic logic, i.e., trees are plants but not all plants are trees. Natural born Citizens are a subset of “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” but not all “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” are “natural born Citizens”: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/06/20/of-natural-born-citizens-and-citizens-at-birth-and-basic-logic-trees-are-plants-but-not-all-plants-are-trees-natural-born-citizens-nbc-are-citizens-at-birth-cab-but-not-all-cab/ … AND … http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html Also watch this video by the renowned constitutional scholar Dr. Herb Titus — Part I: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esiZZ-1R7e8 and Part II: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoaZ8WextxQ

ProtectOurLiberty WebsiteSpaceMy BlogSpaceDocs Collections Re Obama SpaceMy YouTube SpaceMost Recent Full Pg Ad SpaceAd Archives SpaceFliers/Handouts SpaceBlock Ads SpaceSheriff to Sheriffs – Sheriff Kit Project SpaceGet A Sheriff Kit SpaceInterviews-Audio/Print SpaceBooks SpaceGoat’s Ledge SpaceContact Me

Advertisements

New Presidential Eligibility Challenge Filed with Supreme Court of Texas

Click on Texas Flag for more information about "natural born Citizen" and presidential eligibility clause
Click on Texas Flag for more information about “natural born Citizen” and presidential eligibility clause

New Presidential Eligibility Challenge Filed with Supreme Court of Texas – “THEY WANT THE SYSTEM TO FAIL FIRST” | by Sharon Rondeau | ThePostEmail.com

“(Mar. 1, 2016) — On Tuesday, The Post & Email received a tip that an eligibility challenge was filed with the Supreme Court of Texas claiming that the constitutional process by which delegates are awarded to presidential candidates is broken.

Two individuals worked on the filing, with one having done the writing and the other the proofreading.  In an exclusive interview, the writer told The Post & Email that the document is 113 pages long, is divided into three sections, contains a number of attachments, and was a year in the making.

“This is a federal constitutional crisis that bleeds over into the state,” she told The Post & Email, stating that ineligible candidates are violating Texas state law.  The documents were filed with the Texas Supreme Court, she said, as a result of the defendants’ positions within the state executive branch of government. … ”   Continue reading this breaking news at:  http://www.thepostemail.com/2016/03/01/exclusive-new-presidential-eligibility-challenge-filed-with-supreme-court-of-texas/

# # # #

CDR Charles Kerchner, P.E. (Retired)
Lehigh Valley PA USA
http://www.scribd.com/protectourliberty/collections/
http://www.protectourliberty.org
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com

P.S. Here is a chart which lists and explains the five (5) Citizenship terms used in the U.S. Constitution.
P.P.S. Being a “born Citizen” or “Citizen at Birth” is not identically the same as a being a “natural born Citizen”.
P.P.P.S. Obama is NOT a “natural born Citizen of the United States” to U.S. Constitutional standards. Read this essay regarding the legal term of art “natural born Citizen” and basic logic, i.e., trees are plants but not all plants are trees. Natural born Citizens are a subset of “born Citizens (citizens at birth)”. All “natural born Citizens” are “born Citizens (citizens at birth) but not all “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” are “natural born Citizens”: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/06/20/of-natural-born-citizens-and-citizens-at-birth-and-basic-logic-trees-are-plants-but-not-all-plants-are-trees-natural-born-citizens-nbc-are-citizens-at-birth-cab-but-not-all-cab/ Also read the “Three Legged Stool Test” for Natural Born Citizen https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2013/11/15/the-three-legged-stool-test-analogy-for-natural-born-citizenship-of-the-united-states-to-constitutional-standards/ … AND … http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html Also watch this video by the renowned constitutional scholar Dr. Herb Titus: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esiZZ-1R7e8