Rafael “TED” Cruz’s eligibility – The whole sordid affair | @ Running2016.com

Canadian-born Ted Cruz and Cuban Citizen at Birth via his Cuban father is NOT constitutional eligible to be President and CINC, or VP
Canadian-born Ted Cruz and Cuban Citizen at Birth via his Cuban father is NOT constitutional eligible to be President and CINC, or VP. Click Image for details.

Canadian Rafael “TED” Cruz’s eligibility – The whole sordid affair  | @ Running2016.comh/t to Gary Wilmott

Per this article Ted’s mom at some point in time became a British Subject and then later a Canadian Citizen. Ted Cruz may have been born with NO U.S. Citizenship of any kind since his mother may have become a Canadian Citizen after living in Canada for only one year using a fast-track for British Subjects, which it is alleged Ted’s mom was at one point as a result of her marriage and move to England and living there for several years. She could have so declared herself to still be a British Subject once she moved to Canada. The old once a Brit always a Brit factors could have been in play too. She may have only told Canadian authorities some but not all of her life narrative and citizenship status facts up to that point in time after moving to Canada. She may have claimed she was still a British Subject.  Read this excerpt from the Running2016.com article. Then read the whole article.

” …  The newly hired Eleanor and Rafael started working together as mathematicians for the New Orleans oil company in 1967, and with both being from Texas, alone in an exciting city, it didn’t take long for them to become involved, even though they were both married to other people. Within months they were scheming to make their new found love permanent. A real life Desi and Lucy. The problem was that they were both still married to other people and neither was a US citizen. Eleanor was now British and there was a record of her US marriage to Alan but no record of a US divorce, and the only reason Rafael was still in the US was because he was married to a US citizen, if he divorced his wife Julia and she turned him in then he would be deported. It is highly questionable why he never filed to become a US citizen during these 8 years of marriage.

As mathematicians in their jobs they analyzed geographical seismic data from areas where various oil companies were searching for oil. One of the areas that the company was getting a lot of business from was the Calgary Canada fields and as the analysts assigned to the project, they found their answer. By moving to Canada there would be no record of any previous marriages or divorce, no need to worry about Rafael getting a divorce and being deported. The best part of this plan was that according to the Canadian Citizen Act of 1947, as a British subject Eleanor was entitled to Canadian Citizenship after living there one year. Then marrying Rafael in Canada would make him a Canadian citizen after one year too. It seemed like the perfect plan so within 6 months of starting their new jobs and meeting each other, they quit and headed to Calgary together, telling family and friends that ‘work’ was sending them there.  (Rafael’s move to Canada should have also generated an A-File entry.)

Among the changes introduced by the Canadian Citizen Act of 1947 were the following:  …  “

Continue reading the 2016Running.com article at this link:  http://running2016.com/html/canadian_ted.html

Another thought: In reading this and looking at the time frame that Cruz’s dad and mom moved to Canada, I have wondered at times if part of the motivation for their move to Canada in the late 1960’s was to avoid daddy Cruz being drafted into the U.S. Army during the very hot and active Vietnam War at that time.  Many legally resident aliens and U.S. citizens left for Canada during that time frame to avoid being drafted.  I wonder what Mr. Cruz’s draft draft system lottery number was in the year they left for Canada … a low number  (meaning very likely to be drafted in that year) or a high one (low chance of being drafted that year)?  Or did they leave in anticipation of a larger draft coming?  What exact date did they move to Canada? What exact date were the first lottery numbers drawn?

# # # #

Read the: The Who What When Where Why and How of the “natural born Citizen” Term in Our U.S. Constitution

cruzandrubionoteligiblepetitionsbanner(596x130) Cruz and Rubio were Citizens at Birth of a Foreign Country (Ted of 2 Foreign Countries) – Both NOT a “natural born Citizen” of the United States

Get PDF Copy of Ted Cruz Foreign Citizenship Facts Petition Here — Get PDF Copy of Marco Rubio Foreign Citizenship Facts Petition Here – Neither is constitutionally eligible to serve as President and Commander in Chief or Vice President!

A Simple Euler Logic Diagram Shows Logical Relationship of “natural born Citizens” to Other Type “Citizens” of the United States. Only a “natural born Citizen” Can Constitutionally be the President and Commander in Chief or the Vice-President. Click on Image For More Information.

More historical and legal papers and analysis on the true constitutional meaning and intent of the founders and framers of the presidential eligibility clause, natural born Citizen, in our U.S. Constitution can be found at this link: http://www.scribd.com/collections/3301209/

CDR Charles Kerchner (Retired)
Lehigh Valley PA USA
http://www.protectourliberty.org/
http://www.scribd.com/protectourliberty/collections/
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/

P.S. Also read this essay regarding the constitutional term in the presidential eligibility clause “natural born Citizen” and basic logic, i.e., trees are plants but not all plants are trees. Natural born Citizens are a subset of “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” but not all “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” are “natural born Citizens”: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/06/20/of-natural-born-citizens-and-citizens-at-birth-and-basic-logic-trees-are-plants-but-not-all-plants-are-trees-natural-born-citizens-nbc-are-citizens-at-birth-cab-but-not-all-cab/ … AND … http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html Also watch this video by the renowned constitutional scholar Dr. Herb Titus — Part I: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esiZZ-1R7e8 and Part II: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoaZ8WextxQ

ProtectOurLiberty WebsiteSpaceMy BlogSpaceDocs Collections Re Obama SpaceMy YouTube SpaceMost Recent Full Pg Ad SpaceAd Archives SpaceFliers/Handouts SpaceBlock Ads SpaceSheriff to Sheriffs – Sheriff Kit Project SpaceGet A Sheriff Kit SpaceInterviews-Audio/Print SpaceBooks SpaceGoat’s Ledge SpaceContact Me

Advertisements

Ted Cruz: Neither a Natural Born Citizen Nor “TrusTed” | by Atty Mario Apuzzo

Click on image to read his new essay
Click on image to read his new essay by this constitutional Article II “natural born Citizen” term scholar and expert

Ted Cruz:  Neither a Natural Born Citizen Nor “TrusTed” | by Atty Mario Apuzzo

”  … “TrusTed” (one of his campaign slogans) Ted Cruz, born in a foreign nation to an alien father, is running for President.  Eligibility to be elected President is found in Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 which provides:  “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”  Since Cruz was born in 1970, he must be not only a “citizen” of the United States, but a “natural born citizen” of the United States in order to be eligible to be elected President.  So, is Cruz a natural born citizen?  The answer is “no.”  …

.

[snip]

.

The Founders and Framers wrote the Constitution in a way that best provided for the protection of our unalienable rights to life, liberty, property, and the pursuit of happiness. They sought to do that by giving us a constitutional republic and providing for the survival and preservation of that republic. In the governmental scheme that they gave us, they provided for the Office of President and Commander in Chief, a singular and all-powerful office involving the concentration of both civilian and military power into one person. Because of such concentration of power in one individual, the Framers recognized that such offices also presented great risk to the republic and its people. They therefore gave us the “natural born Citizen” clause as one basis for eligibility to such offices. Through the natural born citizen clause, they instructed us that such power must fall into the hands of a person who can be trusted with it to the greatest degree possible and that such guarantee is of much greater importance to the survival and preservation of the constitutional republic than the fleeting politics and personal favor of having one person necessarily occupy that office. What is profound is that the Founders and Framers put their trust in “Nature and Nature’s God”[15] and not in political and legal institutions to accomplish that end. 

This historical and legal evidence, not meant to be exhaustive, provides a clear picture that Ted Cruz is not a natural born citizen and therefore not eligible to be President.[16]  So, is Ted Cruz a natural born citizen and to be “Trusted?”  I think not.  … “

Continue reading the entire new article by Atty Apuzzo’s at:  http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2016/03/ted-cruz-neither-natural-born-citizen.html

# # # #

CDR Charles Kerchner (Retired)
Lehigh Valley PA USA
http://www.scribd.com/protectourliberty/collections/
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com
http://www.protectourliberty.org

Ted Cruz Cannot Constitutionally Stand for President or VP. He is Constitutionally Missing Two Legs!
Ted Cruz Cannot Constitutionally Stand for President and Commander in Chief or VP. He is Constitutionally Missing Two Legs!

P.S. Here is a chart which lists and explains the five (5) Citizenship terms used in the U.S. Constitution.
P.P.S. Being a “born Citizen” or “Citizen at Birth” is not identically the same as a being a “natural born Citizen”.
P.P.P.S. Obama is NOT a “natural born Citizen of the United States” to U.S. Constitutional standards. Read this essay regarding the legal term of art “natural born Citizen” and basic logic, i.e., trees are plants but not all plants are trees. Natural born Citizens are a subset of “born Citizens (citizens at birth)”. All “natural born Citizens” are “born Citizens (citizens at birth) but not all “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” are “natural born Citizens”: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/06/20/of-natural-born-citizens-and-citizens-at-birth-and-basic-logic-trees-are-plants-but-not-all-plants-are-trees-natural-born-citizens-nbc-are-citizens-at-birth-cab-but-not-all-cab/ Also read the “Three Legged Stool Test” for Natural Born Citizen https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2013/11/15/the-three-legged-stool-test-analogy-for-natural-born-citizenship-of-the-united-states-to-constitutional-standards/ … AND … http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html Also watch this video by the renowned constitutional scholar Dr. Herb Titus: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esiZZ-1R7e8