Bombshell: Maine Governor Paul LePage Endorsed Trump Because He’s A Natural Born Citizen And Eligible | @ BirtherReport.com
” …When asked why he chose to throw his support behind Trump as opposed to one of the other remaining candidates in the race, LePage responded that his decision was rather simple. LePage, a U.S. citizen born in Maine, revealed that two of his adult daughters were born in Canada during the 70’s when LePage was living and employed there. LePage told Carr that he and his wife were required to have their daughters naturalized. LePage continued, stating that he had sought an answer as to whether or not either of his Canadian-born daughters could ever become President.
LePage told Carr that his inquiry resulted in an unequivocal “No”. Lepage’s daughters, born in Canada to two U.S. citizen parents, are not natural-born citizens. As such, LePage was told that neither daughter is eligible to hold the office of President of the United States. … “
Click on image for more information about CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)Click image to learn more about Atty Mario Apuzzo, who practices Citizenship Law in NJ, and is an Article II presidential eligibility law expert.
The show discussion topic will be the “natural born Citizen” constitutional and presidential eligibility term and Marco Rubio’s and Ted Cruz’s lack of “natural born Citizen” status. Per the founders and framers understanding, and use of Natural Law and not British Common Law to justify the revolution and to found our nation and write the founding documents, a “natural born Citizen” is defined as a person who must be born in the USA to parents who were both U.S. Citizens when their child was born in the USA. Neither Marco Rubio nor Ted Cruz meet that birth status and thus they both lack constitutional eligibility to be President and Commander in Chief, or the VP.
Marco Rubio was born a dual-Citizen at birth to two Cuban national, non-U.S. Citizen parents. Ted Cruz was born a tri-Citizen at birth to a Cuban Citizen and National father, a mother who was born a U.S. Citizen, and Canadian by being born in the country of Canada, where he lived as a young lad for several years. Other people sometimes mentioned as being considered for the VP slot such as Bobby Jindal of LA and Nikki Haley of SC are also not a “natural born Citizen” and thus they too are not constitutionally eligible since while they were born in the USA their parents were Citizens and Nationals of India when they were born. Thus they too were dual-Citizens at birth. And of course Obama is not a “natural born Citizen” but has thus far got away with his usurpation of office. We cannot allow this to happen again.
We cannot allow someone to violate the Constitution while they are telling us they want to save the Constitution. If they are willing to willingly and knowingly violate Article II of the U.S. Constitution to get into office, what other parts of the Constitution would they be willing to violate once they get into the Oval Office. The “natural born Citizen” clause is a National Security Clause put in the Constitution by John Jay and George Washington as a Strong Check against foreign influence at birth for the person serving in our highest elected office to prevent anyone born with Divided Allegiances and Dual-Citizenship from gaining command of our military. We must support and defend this very important national security clause in our U.S. Constitution, no matter how much we like a particular political candidate and the things they are promising.
Some ask, how foreign is too foreign to serve in the Oval Office? The answer — any foreign influence at birth is too foreign for the highest office of the land. You say, Canada’s not so bad. They are our neighbors and a friendly country. But it is still a foreign country. Think about it. If we keep allowing the bar of constitutional eligibility to be diluted or broken and to be moved away from original understanding and intent of the founders and framers, in a decade or two the next candidate foisted on us by the political establishment with connections and access to vast amounts of foreign money could be someone born in Saudi Arabia, to a U.S. born mother, and an Iranian Citizen and National father. And they would cite Obama and Cruz and/or Rubio as precedence. Look what we got with the Citizen of the World Barack Obama in office for two terms.
For the Commander in Chief of our military, any foreign influence on them at birth by soil or parentage is too foreign. These political candidates, Rubio and Cruz, can serve in any other elected office in the USA. But they cannot constitutionally serve as President and Commander in Chief, and per the last line of 12th Amendment, nor can they serve as the VP.
Click on image for more info on Atty Apuzzo’s writings on true meaning of the constitutional term “natural born Citizen”
A Citizen is One Thing, But a Natural Born Citizen is Another | by Atty Mario Apuzzo
“Understanding that a citizen of the United States (“citizen”) is one thing, but that a natural born citizen of the United States (“natural born citizen”) is another is the key to understanding what a natural born citizen is. To avoid constitutional error, it is critical that these two classes of citizens not be conflated, confounded, and confused. There are different way by which one can become a citizen. But none of that does or should change what a natural born citizen is.
Why is it important that we understand the constitutional distinction between a citizen and a natural born citizen and give the correct meaning to a natural born citizen? It is important because the Framers looked to the natural born citizen clause, apart from the Electoral College, through its requirement of absolute allegiance and love of country, as a means to provide for the safety and national security of the republic. They looked to the natural born citizen clause as a way to keep monarchical and foreign influence out of the singular and powerful civil Office of President and military Office of Commander in Chief of the Military. The Framers saw such monarchical and foreign influence as an insidious way to destroy what they had so greatly sacrificed to build. … “
– 
