Breaking-Exclusive: Co-Author Neal Katyal of Harvard Law Review Forum Article on Ted Cruz eligibility argued in favor (and the U.S. Supreme Court Ruling agreed) of and for upholding the applicable 1952 U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Act (INA) in the 2010 SCOTUS case which established conditions for and said that persons born abroad to a sole U.S. Citizen parent in a status similar to Ted Cruz, whether the parent is a Father or a Mother, are at birth Statutory Citizens and Naturalized Citizens per the 1952 statutory immigration and naturalization law enacted by Congress.
Then in 2016 in the Harvard Law Review Forum, Neal Kaytal argued the opposite for a similar set of facts for a foreign-born person to one U.S. Citizen parent. He argued that foreign-born Ted Cruz is NOT a “Naturalized Citizen” at birth per U.S. Statutory Law enacted by Congress but instead is a “natural born Citizen” at birth and thus since a “naturalized Citizen” cannot be President, that Ted Cruz is eligible. Katyal Double Talking to America. What an ethically challenged and politically driven and conflicted attorney and person Neal Kaytal obviously is.
Read the new article here: http://www.thepostemail.com/2016/04/17/breaking-exclusive-co-author-of-harvard-law-review-forum-article-on-cruz-eligibility-argued-in-favor-of-contradictory-citizenship-law-in-2010/
# # # #
Get PDF Copy of Ted Cruz Foreign Citizenship Facts Petition Here — Get PDF Copy of Marco Rubio Foreign Citizenship Facts Petition Here – Neither is constitutionally eligible to serve as President and Commander in Chief or Vice President!
A Simple Euler Logic Diagram Shows Logical Relationship of “natural born Citizens” to Other Type “Citizens” of the United States. Only a “natural born Citizen” Can Constitutionally be the President and Commander in Chief or the Vice-President. Click on Image For More Information.
More historical and legal papers and analysis on the true constitutional meaning and intent of the founders and framers of the presidential eligibility clause, natural born Citizen, in our U.S. Constitution can be found at this link: http://www.scribd.com/collections/3301209/
CDR Charles Kerchner (Retired)
Lehigh Valley PA USA
P.S. Also read this essay regarding the constitutional term in the presidential eligibility clause “natural born Citizen” and basic logic, i.e., trees are plants but not all plants are trees. Natural born Citizens are a subset of “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” but not all “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” are “natural born Citizens”: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/06/20/of-natural-born-citizens-and-citizens-at-birth-and-basic-logic-trees-are-plants-but-not-all-plants-are-trees-natural-born-citizens-nbc-are-citizens-at-birth-cab-but-not-all-cab/ … AND … http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html Also watch this video by the renowned constitutional scholar Dr. Herb Titus — Part I: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esiZZ-1R7e8 and Part II: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoaZ8WextxQ