Commission on Presidential Debates Should Cancel Debates Until Obama Docs are Legally Properly Vetted

Read the evidence that Obama is committing criminal ID fraud and should not be allowed into the presidential debates

Commission on Presidential Debates Should Cancel Debates Until Obama Docs are Legally Properly Vetted – Article II Super PAC Washington Times National Weekly Edition Ad – 10 Sep 2012 issue – two page centerfold

The Director of the Article II Super PAC, Helen Tansey, speaks out about her orgs certified letter to the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) and its members for them to live up to their published rules as to who can be invited into the debates.  They must be constitutionally eligible for the office they seek per their own rules.  Obama is clearly not eligible and the DNC has falsely certified their ID fraud Obama is. The political parties can no longer be trusted to properly and legally and constitutionally vet their candidates.  They are putting party political power above the Constitution.  No one in the election campaign steps process in 2008 and now again in 2012 has properly legally vetted Obama’s ID documents.  The CPD must do their job this time.  They are on notice to do so this time.  When the truth comes out about Obama and what the DNC has done, history will judge all involved and those who fail to do their fiduciary job to enforce the Constitution and protect the election process from frauds.  Read her statement here: 

Read her full statement here:  http://www.art2superpac.com/blog/?viewDetailed=00016

See, read, and download the advertorial challenging the Commission on Presidential Debates to vet the candidates per their own charter and rules as to who can be in the debates which appears in the 10 Sep 2012 issue of the Washington Times here:  http://www.scribd.com/doc/105498465/Ad-Cancel-Presidential-Debates-Washington-Times-9-10-2012-Article-II-Super-PAC

# # # #

Also, read more about Obama’s Crimes and his Constitutional Ineligibility here:  http://www.scribd.com/protectourliberty/collections/

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
Lehigh Valley PA USA
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/
http://www.protectourliberty.org/
http://www.scribd.com/protectourliberty/collections/

“The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the veil of indifference to their necessity to continually be “on watch” and at times to stand up and protect our U.S. Constitution from usurpation by progressive/marxist/radical politicians operating in relative secrecy protected by an enabling press and major media … thinking and saying it’s the job of someone else … and living their lives in general apathy about what the national government is up to, they will allow the adoption of every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation without knowing how it happened.” CDR Kerchner (Ret)’s alert and paraphrasing earlier warnings about the socialist/progressives’ long-term stealth agenda to transform the USA from a constitutional republic into a top-down, central controlled, fascist-socialist form of government.

Helen Tansey Director Art II Super PAC interview by Mark Gillar regarding Letter to Commission on Presidential Debates about Properly Vetting Obama

Click on Mark Gillar’s picture to listen to the interview

Helen Tansey Director Art II Super PAC interview by Mark Gillar regarding Letter to Commission on Presidential Debates about Properly Vetting Obama This Election Cycle.  Every institution charged with vetting the candidates failed in 2008. Let’s not let it happen all over again in 2012.

Listen to the interview at:  http://www.blogtalkradio.com/markgillar/2012/09/04/meet-helen-tansey-of-art2superpaccom-1

Read the letter sent by the Article II Super PAC to the Commission on Presidential Debates here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/104558880/Article-II-Super-PAC-Letter-to-Commission-on-Presidential-Debates-8-30-2012

# # # #

Also, read more about Obama’s Crimes and his Constitutional Ineligibility here:  http://www.scribd.com/protectourliberty/collections/

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
Lehigh Valley PA USA
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/
http://www.protectourliberty.org/
http://www.scribd.com/protectourliberty/collections/

“The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the veil of indifference to their necessity to continually be “on watch” and at times to stand up and protect our U.S. Constitution from usurpation by progressive/marxist/radical politicians operating in relative secrecy protected by an enabling press and major media … thinking and saying it’s the job of someone else … and living their lives in general apathy about what the national government is up to, they will allow the adoption of every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation without knowing how it happened.” CDR Kerchner (Ret)’s alert and paraphrasing earlier warnings about the socialist/progressives’ long-term stealth agenda to transform the USA from a constitutional republic into a top-down, central controlled, fascist-socialist form of government.

A Call to Action: As Briefed in Kerchner et al v Obama et al in Jan 2009 The Commission on Presidential Debates MUST determine that all of the candidates are Natural Born Citizens

A Call to Action: As Briefed in Kerchner et al v Obama et al in Jan  2009 The Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) Must determine that all of the candidates are Natural Born Citizens.  They did not do their vetting job in 2008. We are going to insist they do so in 2012. Help us to educate the CDP as to their own vetting rules.  See below for the rules and regulations as to whom can be admitted to the Presidential Debates.

2012 Candidate Selection Criteria:  http://www.debates.org/index.php?page=candidate-selection-process

Commission on Presidential Debates’ Nonpartisan Candidate Selection Criteria For 2012 General Election Debate Participation

A.        INTRODUCTION
The mission of the nonpartisan Commission on Presidential Debates (the “CPD”) is to ensure, for the benefit of the American electorate, that general election debates are held every four years between the leading candidates for the offices of President and Vice President of the United States.  The CPD sponsored a series of such debates in each of the past six general elections, and has begun the planning, preparation, and organization of a series of nonpartisan debates among leading candidates for the Presidency and Vice Presidency in the 2012 general election.  As in prior years, the CPD’s voter educational activities will be conducted in accordance with all applicable legal requirements, including regulations of the Federal Election Commission that require that debate sponsors extend invitations to debate based on the application of “pre-established, objective” criteria.
The goal of the CPD’s debates is to afford the members of the public an opportunity to sharpen their views, in a focused debate format, of those candidates from among whom the next President and Vice President will be selected.  In each of the last six elections, there were scores of declared candidates for the Presidency, excluding those seeking the nomination of one of the major parties.  During the course of the campaign, the candidates are afforded many opportunities in a great variety of forums to advance their candidacies.  In order most fully and fairly to achieve the educational purposes of its debates, the CPD has developed nonpartisan, objective criteria upon which it will base its decisions regarding selection of the candidates to participate in its 2012 debates.  The purpose of the criteria is to identify those candidates who have achieved a level of electoral support such that they realistically are considered to be among the principal rivals for the Presidency.
In connection with the 2012 general election, the CPD will apply three criteria to each declared candidate to determine whether that candidate qualifies for inclusion in one or more of the CPD’s debates.  The criteria are (1) constitutional eligibility, (2) ballot access, and (3) electoral support.  All three criteria shall be satisfied before a candidate will be invited to debate.
B.        2012 NONPARTISAN SELECTION CRITERIA
The CPD’s nonpartisan criteria for selecting candidates to participate in the 2012 general election presidential debates are:

1.     EVIDENCE OF CONSTITUTIONAL ELIGIBILITY
The CPD’s first criterion requires satisfaction of the eligibility requirements of Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution.  The requirements are satisfied if the candidate:
a.          is at least 35 years of age;
b.          is a Natural Born Citizen of the United States and a resident of the United States for fourteen years; and
c.          is otherwise eligible under the Constitution.
2.     EVIDENCE OF BALLOT ACCESS
The CPD’s second criterion requires that the candidate qualify to have his/her name appear on enough state ballots to have at least a mathematical chance of securing an Electoral College majority in the 2012 general election.  Under the Constitution, the candidate who receives a majority of votes in the Electoral College, at least 270 votes, is elected President regardless of the popular vote.
3.     INDICATORS OF ELECTORAL SUPPORT
The CPD’s third criterion requires that the candidate have a level of support of at least 15% (fifteen percent) of the national electorate as determined by five selected national public opinion polling organizations, using the average of those organizations’ most recent publicly-reported results at the time of the determination.

C.        APPLICATION OF CRITERIA
The CPD’s determination with respect to participation in the CPD’s first-scheduled debate will be made after Labor Day 2012, but sufficiently in advance of the first-scheduled debate to allow for orderly planning.  Invitations to participate in the vice-presidential debate will be extended to the running mates of each of the presidential candidates qualifying for participation in the CPD’s first presidential debate.  Invitations to participate in the second and third of the CPD’s scheduled presidential debates will be based upon satisfaction of the same multiple criteria prior to each debate.

A Call to Action: Write to the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) and their members and demand they properly do their vetting job of Obama this time around.  Here is a link to the list of members of the CPD: http://www.debates.org/index.php?page=commission-leadership

One can also send comments by email to the Debate Commission. Comments may be sent to: comments@debates.org

# # # #

The ‘natural born Citizen’ presidential eligibility clause in our U.S. Constitution is a national security clause inserted into our Constitution by John Jay and George Washington. Barack Obama is NOT a “natural born Citizen” of the United States.  Read why the natural born Citizen clause is still important and worth protecting.

Five Citizenship Terms Mentioned in the U.S. Constitution: http://www.scribd.com/doc/11737124/Citizenship-Terms-Used-in-the-US-Constitution-The-5-Terms-Defined-Some-Legal-Reference-to-Same 

Of Trees and Plants and Basic Logic and Citizenship Types: http://www.scribd.com/doc/44814496/Of-Trees-and-Plants-and-Basic-Logic-Citizen-at-Birth-NOT-Identical-to-Natural-Born-Citizen

See evidence Obama forged the birth certificate posted on White House servers 27 Apr 2011: http://www.scribd.com/collections/3166684

Click Image for Details

See evidence Obama is using a SSN 042-68-4425 not legally issued to him: http://www.scribd.com/collections/3260742

Click on image for more information about Obama

using a dead person’s SSN originally from Connecticut

See evidence of Obama’s forged and back dated draft registration here: http://www.debbieschlussel.com/4428/exclusive-did-next-commander-in-chief-falsify-selective-service-registration-never-actually-register-obamas-draft-registration-raises-serious-questions/

Click on image for video with more details

The Obama constitutional eligibility issue is not a fringe issue:

 A poll done by Public Policy Polling (PPP) shows that almost 2/3 of GOP voters want Obama’s constitutional eligibility and true legal identity investigated: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.printable&pageId=340805

This recent poll in AZ shows 6 out of 10 voters there want Obama identity and eligibility investigated: http://www.wnd.com/2012/05/amazing-number-want-to-know-candidates-eligibility

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
Lehigh Valley PA USA
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/
http://www.protectourliberty.org/
http://www.scribd.com/protectourliberty/collections/

“The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the veil of indifference to their necessity to continually be “on watch” and at times to stand up and protect our U.S. Constitution from usurpation by progressive/marxist/radical politicians operating in relative secrecy protected by an enabling press and major media … thinking and saying it’s the job of someone else … and living their lives in general apathy about what the national government is up to, they will allow the adoption of every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation without knowing how it happened.” CDR Kerchner (Ret)’s alert and paraphrasing earlier warnings about the socialist/progressives’ long-term stealth agenda to transform the USA from a constitutional republic into a top-down, central controlled, fascist-socialist form of government.

Frank Fahrenkope, Co-Chair, Commission on Presidential Debates Makes False Statement on Fox News about U.S. Constitution Article II Section 1 – Presidential Constitutional Eligibility Requirements

Frank Fahrenkope, Co-Chair, Commission on Presidential Debates Makes False Statement on Fox News about U.S. Constitution Article II Section 1 – Presidential Constitutional Eligibility Requirements

Mr. Fahrenkope, Co-Chair of the Commission on Presidential Debates, states the U.S. Constitution says a President must be a “native born Citizen” when it fact the U.S. Constitution says the President must be a “natural born Citizen”. Is being cute by half?  Does he not know the difference? Does he understand ‘set and subset’ logic? Being native born is a necessary but not sufficient part of the other, i.e., being a natural born Citizen. Is he deliberately misleading the American people as the New York State Election Commission is doing?

See the video of the false/incorrect statement here. If you wish to fast forward to the spot where his misstates what the U.S. Constitution states regarding what type of Citizen per the U.S. Constitution is eligible to serve as the President, go to about 1:20 into the video: http://video.foxnews.com/v/1221582002001/presidential-debates-a

 Being a “native born Citizen” is NOT legally identically equal to being a “natural born Citizen”. There are five types of Citizenship mentioned in the U.S. Constitution.  It should be noted that natural born Citizens are the largest subset by far of the various types of U.S. Citizens.

 Read this essay on basic logic: Of Trees and Plants and Basic Logic: Trees are plants but not all plants are trees. “natural born Citizens (NBC)” are indeed “native born Citizens” and  “Citizens at birth (CAB)” but not all “native born Citizens” and  “Citizens at birth (CAB)” are “natural born Citizens (NBC)”!!

Our constitutional republic is being destroyed by those who are charged with protecting it! Once again the debate commission is looking the other way on the constitutional requirements for the office of the presidency. This is a national disgrace!  Mr. Fahrenkope should be ashamed of himself for misquoting the U.S. Constitution on national television.  Or did he do it on purpose to deliberately misinform the American electorate in order to prep the public with misinformation to try to give Obama an easier pass in the debate qualification phase of the election process, … once again?

See evidence Obama is using an SSN not legally issued to him: Obama Social Security Number (SSN) Fraudulent

See evidence Obama forged the birth certificate posted on White House servers 27 Apr 2011: Obama Birth Certificate & Other Docs Forged – Expert Reports

Adjectives mean something. Barack Obama may be a ‘Citizen of the United States’.  But he is not a ‘natural born Citizen of the United States’ and does not meet the constitutional standards as to who can be the President and Commander in Chief of our military: http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/03/obama-maybe-citizen-of-united-states.html

The natural born Citizen clause of the U.S. Constitution is a national security issue and placed in the U.S. Constitution by the nation’s founders and the Constitution’s framers for national security reasons. We are now faced with the “enemy within” out to destroy our constitutional republic because the natural born Citizen clause of our U.S. Constitution was ignored in the 2008 election and it appears it is going to be usurped again in the coming 2012 election. Misinformation and disinformation is being spewed out at the highest levels.  Wake up Congress!  Wake up People!  This must be stopped!

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
http://www.protectourliberty.org
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com

“The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of liberalism they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation without knowing how it happened.” Norman Thomas

%d bloggers like this: