As Obama Regime Lies Unfold, One “Charade” Remains – Ongoing “Foundational Lie” Continues to Be Ignored

As Obama Regime Lies Unfold, One “Charade” Remains – Ongoing “Foundational Lie” Continues to Be Ignored

by Sharon Rondeau | ThePostEmail.com

(Aug. 18, 2016) — In what was characterized Thursday as an “admission” by U.S. State Department spokesman John Kirby that $400 million paid to Iran at the same time that four American prisoners were released in January amounted to a “ransom,” an RNC spokesman called upon “for the Obama White House to drop the charade and admit it paid a ransom to the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism,” according to Fox News.

The Wall Street Journal first reported on August 3 that the payment was made to Iran in the dark of night, unbeknownst to the American people, in an unmarked airliner in foreign hard currency.

Other lies generated by the Obama regime include:

  • “If you’ve got a doctor that you like, you will be able to keep your doctor.”
  • “ISIS is a ‘JV team’”
  • The Obama regime claimed it was not negotiating with Iran prior to the 2012 presidential election
  • Obama said he could not enact “amnesty” or changes to immigration law without Congress; on November 20, 2014, he declared a number of “executive actions” to “change the law” and allow millions of illegal aliens protecting from deportation in addition to those granted relief from his DACA program.
  • There was not “a smidgeon of corruption” within the IRS after it targeted tax-exempt applicants with political views contrary to that of the Obama regime; media reports say the targeting is ongoing.

There is, however, another “charade” which no one has asked Obama to “drop:”  the image of a purported long-form birth certificate posted on the White House website in 2011 with the apparent intent of quieting Donald Trump’s challenges to Obama’s constitutional eligibility and convincing the public that Obama was born in Hawaii, as he has claimed for a number of years. …  Continue reading this article at:  http://www.thepostemail.com/2016/08/18/as-obama-regime-lies-unfold-one-charade-remains-ongoing/

# # # #

Read the: The Who What When Where Why and How of the “natural born Citizen” Term in Our U.S. Constitution

A Simple Euler Logic Diagram Shows Logical Relationship of “natural born Citizens” to Other Type “Citizens” of the United States. Only a “natural born Citizen” Can Constitutionally be the President and Commander in Chief or the Vice-President. Click on Image For More Information.

More historical and legal papers and analysis on the true constitutional meaning and intent of the founders and framers of the presidential eligibility clause, natural born Citizen, in our U.S. Constitution can be found at this link: http://www.scribd.com/collections/3301209/

CDR Charles Kerchner (Retired)
Lehigh Valley PA USA
http://www.protectourliberty.org/
http://www.scribd.com/protectourliberty/collections/
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/

P.S. Also read this essay regarding the constitutional term in the presidential eligibility clause “natural born Citizen” and basic logic, i.e., trees are plants but not all plants are trees. Natural born Citizens are a subset of “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” but not all “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” are “natural born Citizens”: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/06/20/of-natural-born-citizens-and-citizens-at-birth-and-basic-logic-trees-are-plants-but-not-all-plants-are-trees-natural-born-citizens-nbc-are-citizens-at-birth-cab-but-not-all-cab/ … AND … http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html Also watch this video by the renowned constitutional scholar Dr. Herb Titus — Part I: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esiZZ-1R7e8 and Part II: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoaZ8WextxQ

ProtectOurLiberty WebsiteSpaceMy BlogSpaceDocs Collections Re Obama SpaceMy YouTube SpaceMost Recent Full Pg Ad SpaceAd Archives SpaceFliers/Handouts SpaceBlock Ads SpaceSheriff to Sheriffs – Sheriff Kit Project SpaceGet A Sheriff Kit SpaceInterviews-Audio/Print SpaceBooks SpaceGoat’s Ledge SpaceContact Me

 

 

Advertisements

Elliott v Cruz Petition for Writ of Certiorari Filed With U.S. Supreme Court

Click on the image for more on the issues
Click on the image for more on the filing

Elliott v Cruz Petition for Writ of Certiorari Filed With U.S. Supreme Court | Attorney Mario Apuzzo

“On June 28, 2016, I  [Atty Apuzzo]  filed on behalf of Pennsylvania resident Carmon Elliott a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court.  The Petition can be accessed at https://www.scribd.com/document/317863645/Petition-for-a-Writ-of-Certiorari-Elliott-v-Cruz-Filed-6-28-16 .  The Court docketed the Petition on June 30, 2016.  Ted Cruz’s response to the petition is due by August 1, 2016.  The U.S. Supreme Court docket can be read at http://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docketfiles/16-13.htm .

The parties stipulated in the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania that Cruz was born on December 22, 1970, in Calgary, Alberta, Canada; that his mother, Eleanor Darragh, was born on November 23, 1934, in the State of Delaware; that his mother is and has always been a U.S. citizen from the moment of her birth; that at the time of Cruz’s birth, his mother had been physically present in the United States for more than ten years, including at least five years after she reached the age of fourteen; and that Cruz was a citizen at birth.

Elliott filed a petition with the Pennsylvania Secretary of State to set aside the nomination petition of Ted Cruz pursuant to which he sought to appear on the April 26, 2016 primary election ballot for the Office of the President.  In his objection, petitioner alleged that given that Cruz was born out of the territory and jurisdiction of the United States, his name should be stricken from the Pennsylvania 2016 primary ballot because he is not a “natural born citizen” within the meaning of Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the United States Constitution.

Cruz filed his opposition, contending that the Elliott’s objection raised a non-justiciable political question.  As to the merits, Cruz contended that a person born to at least one U.S. citizen parent, regardless of where the child may be born, if a citizen at birth under any law, is an Article II natural born citizen through inheritance of citizenship from the parent (jus sanguinis) and without needing to be born in the United States (jus soli).

The lower court ruled that the political question doctrine did not apply and then went on to decide the merits of Elliott’s objection.  After discussing some articles written by some authorities, the court held that: “Having extensively reviewed all articles cited in this opinion, as well as many others, this Court holds, consistent with the common law precedent and statutory history, that a ‘natural born citizen’ includes any person who is a United States citizen from birth.  Accordingly, because he was a citizen of the United States from birth, Ted Cruz is eligible to serve as President of the United States, and the objection filed by Carmen Elliott to the Nomination Petition of Ted Cruz is denied.”

Elliott appealed the Order of the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, which affirmed that Order on March 31, 2016, and also denied Victor William’s Notice to Intervene as Appellant and Elliott’s application for oral argument.

In our Petition to the U.S. Supreme Court, we argue that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has decided an important question of constitutional law concerning the definition of an article II natural born citizen that has not been but should be settled by the U.S. Supreme Court.  Having a person sit as President and Commander in Chief of the Military who is not a natural born citizen puts the national security of the United States vitally at risk.  Whether or not the President and Commander in Chief is legitimately sitting in those offices impacts the nation’s foreign policy.  The nation needs a definition of “natural born citizen” for future presidential and vice presidential elections.  Congress, the executive, the political parties, and the voters cannot define a natural born citizen.  Only the judiciary can define a natural born citizen. … ”

Continue reading at Attorney Apuzzo’s blog:  http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2016/07/carmon-elliott-files-petition-for-writ.html

# # # #

Read the: The Who What When Where Why and How of the “natural born Citizen” Term in Our U.S. Constitution

A Simple Euler Logic Diagram Shows Logical Relationship of “natural born Citizens” to Other Type “Citizens” of the United States. Only a “natural born Citizen” Can Constitutionally be the President and Commander in Chief or the Vice-President. Click on Image For More Information.

More historical and legal papers and analysis on the true constitutional meaning and intent of the founders and framers of the presidential eligibility clause, natural born Citizen, in our U.S. Constitution can be found at this link: http://www.scribd.com/collections/3301209/

CDR Charles Kerchner (Retired)
Lehigh Valley PA USA
http://www.protectourliberty.org/
http://www.scribd.com/protectourliberty/collections/
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/

P.S. Also read this essay regarding the constitutional term in the presidential eligibility clause “natural born Citizen” and basic logic, i.e., trees are plants but not all plants are trees. Natural born Citizens are a subset of “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” but not all “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” are “natural born Citizens”: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/06/20/of-natural-born-citizens-and-citizens-at-birth-and-basic-logic-trees-are-plants-but-not-all-plants-are-trees-natural-born-citizens-nbc-are-citizens-at-birth-cab-but-not-all-cab/ … AND … http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html Also watch this video by the renowned constitutional scholar Dr. Herb Titus — Part I: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esiZZ-1R7e8 and Part II: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoaZ8WextxQ

ProtectOurLiberty WebsiteSpaceMy BlogSpaceDocs Collections Re Obama SpaceMy YouTube SpaceMost Recent Full Pg Ad SpaceAd Archives SpaceFliers/Handouts SpaceBlock Ads SpaceSheriff to Sheriffs – Sheriff Kit Project SpaceGet A Sheriff Kit SpaceInterviews-Audio/Print SpaceBooks SpaceGoat’s Ledge SpaceContact Me

 

 

Exclusive: 1974 Canadian Electors’ List Named Ted Cruz’s Parents – Only Canadian Citizens Can Vote in Canada!

Ted Cruz is NOT a "natural born Citizen". Click on image to learn what a “natural born Citizen” of the United States truly is
Ted Cruz is NOT a “natural born Citizen”. Click on image to learn what a “natural born Citizen” of the United States truly is

Exclusive: 1974 Canadian Electors’ List Named Ted Cruz’s Parents on Voter Lists.  Only Canadian Citizens Can Vote in Canada! Mother on Elector’s List Indicates She Possibly Declared Herself to Be a Canadian Citizen.  Thus It Appears That Ted Had a Canadian Citizen (born Cuban) Father and Possibly Canadian Citizen (born U.S.) Mother Too.  A Thorough Investigation by Congress of This Matter is Called For.  Ted and the Cruz Family Must Open ALL Canadian Records for Scrutiny.  Let’s See Ted’s Consular Report of Birth Abroad (CRBA), if Ted Has One, which is Used to Perfect the Claim of U.S. Citizenship for a Child Born Abroad.  We Cannot Sweep This Under the Rug Like was Done for Obama’s Lack of Constitutional Eligibility. We Have Plenty of Constitutionally Eligible Candidates. Ted Cruz is NOT one! Ted Cruz Admittedly Being Born in Canada is Pushing the Eligibility Claim “A Bridge Too Far” and He Cannot Constitutionally Serve in the Oval Office as President and Commander-in-Chief — No Matter How Much One Likes Him or Not!

Read and comment here:  http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/01/08/ted-cruz-parents-canada-voters-list/

For the true understanding and intent of “natural born Citizen” and to learn more about the fact that founders and framers REJECTED simply being “born a Citizen” as not being  a sufficient enough “strong check” against “foreign influence” via birth circumstances on the person who wished to be President and Commander-in-Chief of our military, see the following links. They wanted a strong check against a person having foreign born influence on them via birth from ever gaining access to the highest office of our land. see:  https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/tag/constitution-day/

CDR Charles Kerchner, P.E. (Retired)
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com
http://www.protectourliberty.org
http://www.scribd.com/protectourliberty/collections/

P.S. Here is a chart which lists and explains the five (5) Citizenship terms used in the U.S. Constitution.
P.P.S. Being a “born Citizen” or “Citizen at Birth” is not identically the same as a being a “natural born Citizen”.
P.P.P.S. Obama is NOT a “natural born Citizen of the United States” to U.S. Constitutional standards. Read this essay regarding the legal term of art “natural born Citizen” and basic logic, i.e., trees are plants but not all plants are trees. Natural born Citizens are a subset of “born Citizens (citizens at birth)”.  All “natural born Citizens” are “born Citizens (citizens at birth) but not all “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” are “natural born Citizens”:  https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/06/20/of-natural-born-citizens-and-citizens-at-birth-and-basic-logic-trees-are-plants-but-not-all-plants-are-trees-natural-born-citizens-nbc-are-citizens-at-birth-cab-but-not-all-cab/   Also read the “Three Legged Stool Test” for Natural Born Citizen https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2013/11/15/the-three-legged-stool-test-analogy-for-natural-born-citizenship-of-the-united-states-to-constitutional-standards/ … AND … http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html  Also watch this video by the renowned constitutional scholar Dr. Herb Titus: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esiZZ-1R7e8

New Organization To Educate and Mobilize the Public on the Significance of “natural born Citizen” and the 2012 Election | by Sharon Rondeau | @ ThePostEmail.com

Click on image to learn more about why John Jay wrote to George Washington regarding who can be the President and Commander in Chief

New Organization To Educate and Mobilize the Public on the Significance of “natural born Citizen” and the 2012 Election – No Divided Loyalties – Article II Super PAC | by Sharon Rondeau | @ ThePostEmail.com

Read the full report and interview here: http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/12/17/new-organization-to-educate-and-mobilize-the-public-on-the-significance-of-natural-born-citizen-and-the-2012-election/

# # # #

Simply being ‘Born a Citizen’ or a ‘Citizen by Birth’ is not sufficient. The person who is constitutionally eligible to be President and Commander of our Military must be a “natural born Citizen” at birth, i.e., born in the USA to two U.S. Citizen (born or naturalized) parents.  A “natural born Citizen” has no divided loyalties, foreign citizenship, allegiances, or foreign influence or claim of allegiance on them via their birth.  John Jay and George Washington insisted on it for reasons of national security for the future generations after the founding generation was passed – which is why they put the “natural born Citizen” presidential eligibility clause into the U.S. Constitution in Article II Section 1.

Read this essay for more about how and why the natural born Citizen clause got put into the Constitution for national security reasons and what it truly means:  https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2010/09/17/is-being-a-born-citizen-of-the-united-states-sufficient-citizenship-status-to-be-president-the-founders-and-framers-emphatically-decided-it-was-not/

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
Lehigh Valley PA USA
http://www.protectourliberty.org/
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/

“The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of liberalism they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation without knowing how it happened.” Ronald Reagan alerting us to Norman Thomas’ and the socialist/progressive’s long-term stealth agenda to transform the USA from a constitutional republic into a top-down, central controlled, socialist form of government