Is This What the Deep State Truly Fears? | by Sharon Rondeau | @ ThePost&Email
IN A SECOND TERM, WOULD TRUMP INVESTIGATE OBAMA’S “DOCUMENTS?”
(Feb. 26, 2020) — On Wednesday afternoon, citizen researcher, blogger and retired Navy Commander Charles F. Kerchner, Jr. tweeted to President Trump’s personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, his thoughts on the “Deep State” and any potential probe the president might order into the findings that Barack Obama’s “long-form” birth certificate and Selective Service registration form are fraudulent.
“One of [the] major reasons the Deep State is after Trump is because he was questioning Obama’s pres[idential] eligibility & missing birth certificate,” Kerchner tweeted to Giuliani, who has been researching what he alleges is massive corruption involving the Obama regime, Ukraine, China and possibly other countries.
“Trump was labeled a Birther,” Kerchner noted in his tweet. “They fear Trump will some day investigate Obama key forged ID docs…”
Over a period of months in early 2011, Trump publicly called for Obama to release his original birth record to prove his constitutional eligibility to serve as president, leading the White House on April 27 that year to post an image said to represent Obama’s “long-form” birth certificate from Hawaii.
During the Obama years, The New York Times and other mainstream outlets as a bloc adopted and applied the term “birther” to anyone questioning Obama’s birthplace or eligibility, including Trump. Many Americans harbored doubts as to Obama’s eligibility in response to conflicting articles, many from the very same newsrooms [click here for examples], reporting Obama as having been born in Indonesia or Kenya and not Hawaii, as he claims. …
The above is a must read article by Sharon Rondeau at ThePostEmail.com. And the question that first popped in my mind when I saw this AP story in the Business Section of my local newspaper was … why now? First: Why is YouTube doing this now. Second: Why did the Associated Press decide to pump out a nationwide news story with Birtherism in the headline? In my opinion, the social engineers who manipulate public opinion are afraid of something going on in the background that is not being reported by the main stream media and are out and about on the eligibility and birther issues to try and keep the beach ball of persistent questions and the truth on those two issues suppressed and submerged below the water surface of public opinion. What is wrong about questioning the constitutional eligibility of a political candidate? What is happening to political free speech in our country?
What Other Big Story Did the Mainstream Media Squelch? | by Sharon Rondeau | @ ThePostEmail.com
FORGERY, FRAUD, AND AN “OPEN SECRET”
by Sharon Rondeau
(Nov. 6, 2019) — On Tuesday, Project Veritas (PV), founded by James O’Keefe, released an explosive report demonstrating that executives at ABC News declined to air additional evidence pointing to the late Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse of young girls and women over a number of years as described by “Good Morning America” anchor Amy Robach on a “hot mic” and video.
The footage was reportedly recorded in late August and leaked to PV by an ABC News “insider.” O’Keefe and his organization have encouraged members of large tech companies, mainstream media outlets, and other public and private groups to “Be Brave” by coming forward with evidence of bias, corruption and abuse within their respective environments.
“I tried for three years to get it on to no avail,” Robach is seen stating in her “hot-mic” remarks about the Epstein story she researched in 2016 in the wake of Epstein’s death in federal prison on August 10. “And now it’s all coming out and it’s like these new revelations…” She added that “Other women [were] backing it up” and “There will come a day when we will realize Jeffrey Epstein was the most prolific pedophile this country has ever known.”
Epstein was found deceased at the Manhattan Correctional Facility after his early July arrest on allegations of federal sex-trafficking. After what was alleged to have been an initial suicide attempt later in July, his death was pronounced a suicide by federal investigators.
Last week, well-known forensic pathologist Dr. Michael Baden told Fox & Friends that he was asked by Epstein’s brother to attend the autopsy and as a result, determined independently that Epstein’s injuries were more consistent with a homicide rather than a suicide.
Between 2008 and 2009, Epstein served an unusually light 13-month sentence in Palm Beach County on a plea deal on two counts of “felony solicitation of prostitution and procuring a minor for prostitution” brought by the State of Florida, The South Florida Sun-Sentinel reported.
His state prosecution resulted in federal prosecutors abandoning their potential case against him, the paper additionally wrote.
It has long been asserted that former President Bill Clinton flew on Epstein’s infamous private jet, the “Lolita Express,” more than two dozen times. In her remarks on the hot mic, Robach said that “It was unbelievable… we had – Clinton, we had everything…”
After PV’s report was issued Tuesday, ABC News and Robach quickly offered responsive statements, O’Keefe reported, stating that three years ago, the story did not meet the station’s “editorial standards.”
In her statement, Robach asserted, “I was upset that an important interview I had conducted with (claimed Epstein victim) Virginia Roberts didn’t air because we could not obtain sufficient corroborating evidence to meet ABC’s editorial standards about her allegations…”
In 2016, and dating back five years before that, major media swept aside another even more explosive story implicating an unknown number of individuals who knowingly concocted and presented a “computer-generated forgery” to the American people as representative of Barack Hussein Obama’s “long-form” birth certificate.
(Jun. 25, 2019) — One of the Democrat wanna-be candidates yearning for the opportunity to get bludgeoned by President Trump in the 2020 general election is Sen. Kamala Harris. You will recall from her classless performance in the now-Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh Senate Judiciary Committee hearings, she believes that the mere allegation of a crime – and particularly a sexual assault crime – is sufficient to warrant a conclusion of guilt in the alleged perpetrator.
Due process and the presumption of innocence – let alone actual proof or competent evidence of the actual commission of a crime – are principles of law which are foreign to Democrats in general, and seemingly altogether alien to Ms. Harris in particular. Interesting trait in a lawyer…, no?
These circumstances make it all the more ironic and hypocritical – par for the course with Democrats, of course – that Harris, a former San Francisco District Attorney and California Attorney General, would now claim that, because of her “prosecutorial” experience, she is the best situated candidate among the Democrat field to “go after Trump” once she is elected to the presidency. She has even analogized her zeal to pursue President Trump with a reference to a “rap” sheet concocted against the president.
But here’s the juicy part: she recently promised a crowd of supporters in South Carolina that she would “prosecute the case against Trump on the debate stage” prior to the election, if she were the Democrats’ nominee. Please…, please…, D’s…, nominate her and put her on stage next to Trump. Your faithful servant would pay a big-time sum for tickets to be in that same room when the questions begin flying.
One of the first questions that Trump should pose to Harris (regardless of whether it is ‘on topic’ as dictated by the moderators) is this: “Are you eligible under the Constitution as a ‘natural born Citizen?’” Her answer would likely be: “Seriously? You’re going to the ‘birther’ nonsense again? Of course I’m eligible. I was born in Oakland, California.” Trump (or whoever the moderators might be) should follow up: “But when you were born, were your parents already U.S. citizens?” Her likely response: “That doesn’t matter. I have it on good authority that anyone born here, regardless of the citizenship of their parents, is a natural born Citizen.” Trump should then grin and say: “Prove it.”
P&E readers, you see where this is going, right? As your faithful servant has attempted to explain over the years, it was the demonstrable intent of the Founders, for anyone willing to see, to absolutely restrict eligibility to the office of the “Chief Magistrate” – the President – to a “natural born Citizen,” and only to someone who met the criteria for same. That restriction, adopted by the Founders in Art. 2, § 1, Cl. 5 of the Constitution, was taken from § 212 of The Law of Nations, the seminal work of one Emmerich de Vattel, a 17th Century jurist and philosopher. In order to be a “natural born citizen,” as opposed to a “native born citizen” or a “naturalized citizen,” both of one’s parents must be, at the moment of the person’s birth, citizens of the country where the birth occurs.
DeVattel’s work, as recognized by the U.S. Supreme Court, was continually in the hands of the Founders as they labored over the drafting of the Constitution and was the work “most widely cited in the 50 years after the [American] Revolution.” See United States Steel Corp. v. Multistate Tax Commission, 434 U.S. 452, 462, n.12 (1977).
As it turns out, Kamala Harris was born to a Tamil Indian mother, Shyamala Gopalan Harris, and a Jamaican father, Donald Harris. Given that one Barack Hussein Obama II continues to refuse to remove the dark cloud of constitutional ineligibility still hanging over his usurpation of the presidency, Ms. Harris might expect similar problems.
Bear in mind, Monsieur Obama’s “original Hawaiian birth certificate,” thought by many to be (and likely in reality) a computerized forgery, listed his father as being a citizen of Kenya, not the United States. Thus, even if the .pdf image of a document posted to the Internet which he claims is his “real deal” birth certificate were treated as “authentic,” he would still have been ineligible. The fact that his mother (some would even question that “fact”) was a U.S. citizen in 1961 is irrelevant: because his father was never a U.S. citizen, he was, as we say “from the get-go,” ineligible to hold the office of the president. The fact that he occupied the office illegitimately merely recognizes that he “got away with it.” So far…, that is.
Returning to the eligibility of Ms. Harris, because the available public records fail to confirm that both her mother and her father were, on October 20, 1964, naturalized U.S. citizens, her eligibility remains very much in doubt. The several deeply flawed and deceitfully structured Congressional Research Service (“CRS”) Memos and Reports from 2009, 2011 and 2016, seeking to prop up the purported (but false) legitimacy of Monsieur Obama as a natural born Citizen, will not help her. Memo to P&E readers: as noted here, the 2009 CRS “What to Tell your Constituents… Memorandum” has been scrubbed from the Scribd.com website and is no longer accessible there, but you can learn about what it said here, here and here. [Editors note: I have updated the link from “2009” in the upper part of this paragraph to a working URL to see the 2009 CRS Memo.]