President Dwight Eisenhower Had to File a Birth Certificate to Run for President – Unlike Obama, Ike had nothing to hide!

Originally Posted Online by CDR Kerchner @ Puzo1.BlogSpot.com: Saturday, March 26, 2011 @ 3:58 PM

President Dwight Eisenhower Had to File a Birth Certificate to Run for President – Unlike Obama, Ike had nothing to hide!

Via Sonoran News; – Ike needed birth certificate to run for president – ‘Ike had nothing to hide!’

BY LINDA BENTLEY – CAVE CREEK – Glen Fairclough, a reader from Salt Lake City, Utah, sent us an e-mail last week to express his gratitude for publishing the recent article regarding President Obama’s Kenyan birth certificate.And, while going through digital images online of his hometown newspaper, the Deseret News and Telegram, Fairclough forwarded us a United Press wire article from the Oct. 2, 1952 edition he thought we would find interesting.

The article appeared on page 6A with a dateline of Sherman, Texas. It was headlined: “General’s birth certificate officially filed,” and stated, “A certificate recording Dwight Eisenhower’s birth in Denison on Oct. 14, 1890, was filed Wednesday [Oct. 1, 1952] in the Grayson County Clerk’s office. Read more

Read rest of the story via the link and for further information about Ike’s proven natural born Citizenship status upon his birth in Texas in Oct 1890 to two U.S.

citizen parents, unlike Obama who claims he was born in Hawaii but whose father was a foreign national and was not even an immigrant to the USA. And also unlike Ike, Obama has relatives, African newspapers, and government officials in Kenyasaying he was born there and not in the USA. Ike never had relatives and government officials in foreign countries stating repeatedly that he was born in their country. Thus, the logical justification to ask to see Obama’s original long form birth registration documents in Hawaii, and any amendments to same. This is logically needed to verify that he indeed was physically born there and not just had a false birth registration done in Hawaii via sworn affidavit of a birth at home with no independent witnesses and submitted by mail by his maternal grandmother who lived there in order to get U.S. Citizenship for her foreign born grandson. Birth registration fraud was easy in Hawaii in 1961 due to the very lax laws in the new state.Regardless of the lack of claims of foreign birth about Eisenhower, Ike was still required to file a copy of his birth certificate with controlling legal authorities upon running for election as President. So Whoopi Goldberg, was it racist to ask Ike to file a certified paper copy of his birth certificate with controlling legal authorities in order to run for President. Ike wasn’t allowed to just show a picture of it on television. He had to provide a certified paper copy of his birth certificate to the authorities. What is racist about having to prove you are constitutionally eligible to run for President? What is racist about the rule of law of which our U.S. Constitution is the fundamental law of the land. Read more here: http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/03/reminder-dwight-d-eisenhower-had-to.html

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
http://www.protectourliberty.org
http://puzo1.blogspot.com
####

P.S. If Whoopi Goldberg needs another example of others being asked to show documents and birth certificates to prove they are eligible to run for President, she should read about the challenges made to John McCain’s natural born Citizen status in the 2008. John McCain was sued in NH by a man named Hollander charging he was not a natural born Citizen. The Senate Judiciary Committee chaired by Senator Leahy, and of which Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton were voting members, investigated McCain in response to citizen requests. He was required to show his paper certified copy of his birth certificate to them in executive session. But for similar requests in much larger numbers calling for the investigation of Obama’s eligibility, and with lawsuits filed charging Obama was not eligible, that was all ignored by the Democratic Party lead Senate. That is lack of due process and unequal protection under the law of land and the U.S. Constitution. So Whoopi Goldberg’s charges of racism on The View TV show are completely groundless and show her ignorance of history or her willingness to go to the lowest level of politics and debate, and shout and yell and act absurd on air … and play the race card and call and imply that anyone who questions Obama’s eligibility is a racist. See this blog post in late February 2008 and early March 2008 by Professor Jonathan Turley questioning McCain’s eligiblity who along with mysteriously simultaneously appearing articles in the New York Times (looks to me like they were started based on orders from Hillary Clinton operatives) started the investigation of John McCain under constitutional grounds which ultimately lead to the Senate investigation and resolution in April 2008: http://jonathanturley.org/2008/03/06/the-supreme-redux-is-john-mccain-ineligible-to-be-president/ and http://jonathanturley.org/2008/02/29/mccains-constitutional-dilemma-native-son-but-not-natural-born/ . And this one: http://birthers.org/misc/FOMB.html
####

Posted by puzo1moderator (cfkerchner) at 3:58 PM

Atty Mario Apuzzo & CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) were on the Hagmann-McLeod Report on CFP Radio tonight – Saturday 12 Mar 2011 8:00 p.m. EST

Originally Written & Posted Online by CDR Kerchner @ Puzo1.BlogSpot.com: Saturday, March 12, 2011 @ 8:54 PM

Atty Mario Apuzzo & CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) were on the Hagmann-McLeod Report on CFP Radio tonight – Saturday 12 Mar 2011 8:00 p.m. EST

Atty Mario Apuzzo & CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) were on the Hagmann-McLeod Report on CFP Radio tonight – Saturday 12 Mar 2011 8:00 p.m. EST

The topic will be the Obama eligibility issue. See this link for a copy of Atty Mario Apuzzo’s “Catalog of Evidence” as to Obama’s Hawaiian birth nativity story: http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/05/catalog-of-evidence-concerned-americans.html
See this page for more details on the Hagmann-McLeod Report on Canada Free Press (CFP) Radio: http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/34352

Listen to the show via podcast at:
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/cfp-radio/2011/03/13/hagmann-mcleod-report

Posted by:
CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
http://www.protectourliberty.org
http://puzo1.blogspot.com
####

Posted by puzo1moderator (cfkerchner) at 8:54 AM

Atty Mario Apuzzo & CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) was on the Revolution Radio Show hosted by Dr. Kate – Wed, 9 Mar 2011, 9:00 p.m. EST

Originally Written & Posted Online by CDR Kerchner @ Puzo1.BlogSpot.com: Wednesday, March 9, 2011 @ 4:32 PM

Atty Mario Apuzzo & CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) was on the Revolution Radio Show hosted by Dr. Kate – Wed, 9 Mar 2011, 9:00 p.m. EST

Atty Mario Apuzzo & CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) will be on the Revolution Radio Show hosted by Dr. Kate – Wed, 9 Mar 2011, 9:00 p.m. EST.The topic will be the Obama constitutional eligibility issue, natural born Citizenship, and the two Obama appointee Supreme Court justices Sotomayer and Kagan not recusing themselves from the conferences about various cases involving the Obama eligibility issue given their direct financial conflict of interest in the outcome of such cases. Also the latest on states’ efforts to tighten up the vetting process of candidates for President and Vice President as to determining their exact legal citizenship status before being placed on a ballot in the various states in future presidential elections. http://www.blogtalkradio.com/drkate/2011/03/10/drkates-revolution-radio-kerchner-apuzzo-return

Get a copy of Attorney Apuzzo’s “Catalog of Evidence” report about Obama’s Hawiian birth nativity story at SCRIBD. Also see the Kerchner v Obama Petition to the U.S. Supreme Court filed by Attorney Mario Apuzzo in September 2010.

Also read Dr. Kate’s blog at: http://drkatesview.wordpress.com/2011/03/09/kerchner-apuzzo-return-to-revolution-radio/

Posted by:
CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
http://www.protectourliberty.org
http://puzo1.blogspot.com
####

Posted by puzo1moderator (cfkerchner) at 4:34 PM

1st CRS Memo of April 2009 re “natural born Citizen” and Constitutional Presidential Eligibility Subject

The 1st CRS Memo of April 2009 re “natural born Citizen” of United States term in Article II Section 1 Clause 5 of U.S. Constitution – A Key Part of Presidential Eligibility Clause. This CRS Memo Was Quietly Sent to All Members of Congress in Order to Tell Them What to Say to Their Constituents Who Were Strongly Questioning the Constitutional Eligibility of Barack Obama in 2008 and Early 2009 Due to the Kerchner et al vs Obama and Congress et al Lawsuit Filed Against Obama and Congress, et al. This 1st CRS Memo on the “natural born Citizen” Subject Which Was Eventually Revealed to the Public in November 2010 Explained Why for Constituents Who Started Getting Answers in the Spring of 2009 to Their Letters Written to the Members of Congress About this Subject (and many did not even get an answer before that) That the Answers Were Almost Identical Form Letters in Content No Matter Which Member of Congress Sent It. So the Fix Was In to Ignore the “natural born Citizen” Constitutional Term, In More Ways Than One.

 

A multi-part rebuttal written by Joseph DeMaio re the above 1st CRS Memo and a later 2nd CRS Memo which were both filled with clever misinformation and strategic omissions via carefully placed and used ellipses and other writing tricks in treating key information which was done and designed to misinform and mislead the reader as to the founders and framers intent, meaning, and understanding and purpose of the “natural born Citizen” term in the presidential eligibility clause of our U.S. Constitution: http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/05/29/bombshell-second-crs-memo-covering-for-obamas-ineligibility-not-released-to-the-public-until-now/

# # # #

CDR Charles Kerchner, P.E. (Retired)
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com
http://www.scribd.com/user/52640192/protectourliberty/lists
http://www.protectourliberty.org

P.S.  Other suggested reading and viewing on being a “natural born Citizen” of the United States of which Kamala Harris, Barack Obama, Ted Cruz, and others are not:

1. A chart which lists and explains the five (5) Citizenship terms used in the U.S. Constitution.

2. Being a “born Citizen” or “Citizen at Birth” is not identically the same as a being a “natural born Citizen”.

3. Read this essay regarding the constitutional term “natural born Citizen” and basic logic, i.e., trees are plants but not all plants are trees. “Natural born Citizens” are a subset of “born Citizens (citizens at birth)”. Adjectives mean something. All “natural born Citizens” are “born Citizens (citizens at birth) but not all “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” are “natural born Citizens”: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/06/20/of-natural-born-citizens-and-citizens-at-birth-and-basic-logic-trees-are-plants-but-not-all-plants-are-trees-natural-born-citizens-nbc-are-citizens-at-birth-cab-but-not-all-cab/

4. A Euler Diagram which logically shows the kinds of U.S. Citizens and their set and subset relationships: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2018/06/16/natural-born-citizen/

5. The “Three Legged Stool Test” for being a Natural Born Citizen: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2013/11/15/the-three-legged-stool-test-analogy-for-natural-born-citizenship-of-the-united-states-to-constitutional-standards/

6. Article II Presidential Eligibility Facts: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html or https://www.scribd.com/document/161994312/Article-II-Presidential-Eligibility-Facts

7. Watch these videos (Parts I and II) by the renowned constitutional scholar Dr. Herb Titus: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esiZZ-1R7e8 and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoaZ8WextxQ

8. Read, download, and print a PDF copy of this White Paper by CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) about the “natural born Citizen” term and presidential eligibility clause in Article II of our U.S. Constitution here: http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/The-Who-What-When-Where-Why-and-How-of-NBC-Term-in-Constitution.pdf