The Obama Time Line — Condensed Version. A 12 page must read on Obama’s early life.

The Obama Time Line — Condensed Version.  A 12 page must read on Obama’s early life.

http://www.colony14.net/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/condensedtimeline30apr2011v19.pdf

Then if you want to learn even more, buy the authors book at this link:
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1440150737/genealogicalrese

CDR Kerchner (Ret)
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com
http://www.protectourliberty.org

Gov Jindal born a Citizen of India – also a Native-Born U.S. Citizen yes, but Gov. Bobby Jindal is NOT a Natural-Born Citizen. He is not constitutionally eligible to be President or Vice President.

Gov Jindal was born a Citizen of India. Also by being born in the USA he is a native-born U.S. Citizen at birth. But Gov. Bobby Jindal is  NOT a Natural-Born Citizen at birth of the United States. Adjectives mean something. His parents were not U.S. Citizens when he was born in the USA and thus Gov. Bobby Jindal can never be a natural born Citizen at birth. He was NOT born with sole allegiance to the USA. He was born with dual-citizenship and dual-allegiances, India and U.S.  He is NOT constitutionally eligible to be President or Vice President or Commander in Chief of our military.

Gov. Bobby Jindal is a good, conservative Governor for the State of Louisiana. Unfortunately, similar to U.S. Senator Marco Rubio, Gov. Jindal cannot be classified as a natural-born Citizen, and thus he also is not constitutionally eligible to run for President.  I know this is a sad thought for conservatives like myself, but if we wish to protect and uphold the Constitution, we must look to history for an explanation.

Jindal was born in Louisiana, as his recently released birth certificate attests (below). However, at the time of his birth, both of his parents were recent immigrants to the US from India.  His mother was three months pregnant when she arrived in Louisiana. Thus, Jindal is simply a native-born citizen, not a constitutional Article II Section 1 “natural born Citizen” of the United States. Gov Bobby Jindal is a dual Citizen by birth gaining citizenship in India via his non-U.S. Citizen parents and gaining basic U.S. Citizen at Birth status via being born in the USA to people legally allowed to be here. The good news is that if Bobby Jindal’s wife was a citizen when their children were born in the US, then their children will have attained the status of natural born citizenship, which means they can one day run for President. Natural born Citizen is a legal term of art from Natural Law and the Laws of Nature and the Law of Nations. Natural born Citizens are the children of Citizens with said children born in the USA of two U.S. Citizens (who themselves both were either born Citizens or naturalized citizens at the time of birth of their child). Gov Bobby Jindal can serve as a terrific Governor of Louisiana,  or a U.S. Senator from Louisiana, but he is not constitutionally eligible for the office of President and Commander of the Military, or the office of Vice President.

Read this article for more information on the subject of Gov Jindal’s exact citizenship status:  http://jeffersonsrebels.blogspot.com/2011/05/native-born-citizen-yes-but-gov-bobby.html

Posted by:
CDR Kerchner (Ret)
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com
http://www.protectourliberty.org

P.S.  This is NOT about politics or anything else but the U.S. Constitution, the fundamental law of our land.

1st CRS Memo of April 2009 re “natural born Citizen” and Constitutional Presidential Eligibility Subject

The 1st CRS Memo of April 2009 re “natural born Citizen” of United States term in Article II Section 1 Clause 5 of U.S. Constitution – A Key Part of Presidential Eligibility Clause. This CRS Memo Was Quietly Sent to All Members of Congress in Order to Tell Them What to Say to Their Constituents Who Were Strongly Questioning the Constitutional Eligibility of Barack Obama in 2008 and Early 2009 Due to the Kerchner et al vs Obama and Congress et al Lawsuit Filed Against Obama and Congress, et al. This 1st CRS Memo on the “natural born Citizen” Subject Which Was Eventually Revealed to the Public in November 2010 Explained Why for Constituents Who Started Getting Answers in the Spring of 2009 to Their Letters Written to the Members of Congress About this Subject (and many did not even get an answer before that) That the Answers Were Almost Identical Form Letters in Content No Matter Which Member of Congress Sent It. So the Fix Was In to Ignore the “natural born Citizen” Constitutional Term, In More Ways Than One.

 

A multi-part rebuttal written by Joseph DeMaio re the above 1st CRS Memo and a later 2nd CRS Memo which were both filled with clever misinformation and strategic omissions via carefully placed and used ellipses and other writing tricks in treating key information which was done and designed to misinform and mislead the reader as to the founders and framers intent, meaning, and understanding and purpose of the “natural born Citizen” term in the presidential eligibility clause of our U.S. Constitution: http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/05/29/bombshell-second-crs-memo-covering-for-obamas-ineligibility-not-released-to-the-public-until-now/

# # # #

CDR Charles Kerchner, P.E. (Retired)
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com
http://www.scribd.com/user/52640192/protectourliberty/lists
http://www.protectourliberty.org

P.S.  Other suggested reading and viewing on being a “natural born Citizen” of the United States of which Kamala Harris, Barack Obama, Ted Cruz, and others are not:

1. A chart which lists and explains the five (5) Citizenship terms used in the U.S. Constitution.

2. Being a “born Citizen” or “Citizen at Birth” is not identically the same as a being a “natural born Citizen”.

3. Read this essay regarding the constitutional term “natural born Citizen” and basic logic, i.e., trees are plants but not all plants are trees. “Natural born Citizens” are a subset of “born Citizens (citizens at birth)”. Adjectives mean something. All “natural born Citizens” are “born Citizens (citizens at birth) but not all “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” are “natural born Citizens”: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/06/20/of-natural-born-citizens-and-citizens-at-birth-and-basic-logic-trees-are-plants-but-not-all-plants-are-trees-natural-born-citizens-nbc-are-citizens-at-birth-cab-but-not-all-cab/

4. A Euler Diagram which logically shows the kinds of U.S. Citizens and their set and subset relationships: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2018/06/16/natural-born-citizen/

5. The “Three Legged Stool Test” for being a Natural Born Citizen: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2013/11/15/the-three-legged-stool-test-analogy-for-natural-born-citizenship-of-the-united-states-to-constitutional-standards/

6. Article II Presidential Eligibility Facts: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html or https://www.scribd.com/document/161994312/Article-II-Presidential-Eligibility-Facts

7. Watch these videos (Parts I and II) by the renowned constitutional scholar Dr. Herb Titus: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esiZZ-1R7e8 and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoaZ8WextxQ

8. Read, download, and print a PDF copy of this White Paper by CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) about the “natural born Citizen” term and presidential eligibility clause in Article II of our U.S. Constitution here: http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/The-Who-What-When-Where-Why-and-How-of-NBC-Term-in-Constitution.pdf

A TRUE ENIGMA by Pixel Patriot

Originally Written & Posted Online by CDR Kerchner @ Puzo1.BlogSpot.com: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 @ 9:01 PM

A TRUE ENIGMA by Pixel Patriot

A TRUE ENIGMA
by Pixel Patriot

[Reprinted here with a hat tip for the graphics to the BirtherReport.com]

On the one hand it would appear as though Barack Hussein Obama was swept to victory in the 2008 presidential election carried by the optimistic auspices of change with 365 electoral votes, a margin of 52.9%; while on the other hand the apparent victory is illusory.

For even though he is occupying the White House and performing the duties of the President of the United States, he can never erase the fact that he was ineligible for the position to begin with.

Take for example….

THE LAWS OF NATURE

H20 and gravity are not concepts; they exist within the “Laws of Nature”. H20 exists in nature as 3 common states of matter; water, ice and vapor. You might find yourself parched with thirst and desiring a drink of water; yet the “Laws of Nature” say NO, because it is below 32 degrees Fahrenheit / 0 degrees Celsius and the glass frozen to your hand is full of ice. Therefore, the fulfillment of your desire is predicated on the fundamental properties as they exist, which are existential, defined…LAW.

The universal constructs governing gravity where every particle of matter attracts every other particle with a force that is directly proportional to the product of the masses of the particles and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them is not a fanciful concept; it is a “Law of Nature”. You can’t see gravity, but you know it exists because its effects can be quantified, measured and observed. And gravity existed before mathematicians created the symbols for the equations used to express the nature of its law.

The “Laws of Nature” were in effect before their definitions were constituted. Just as the planets have always orbited the sun, mankind previously believed our solar system orbited the earth until we were enlightened with the knowledge of the TRUTH which is empirical.

The bedrock of our society is that the Founding Fathers codified the precept of the “Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God” (LONANG) into our nation’s founding documents. It is in the very first paragraph of THE Declaration of Independence:

IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
Just as the Founding Fathers declared certain rights endowed by the Creator to be unalienable, so too they also proclaimed and set forth as self-evident the “Laws of Nature” are immutable.
It is therefore of no consequence that the Founding Fathers would draw upon Emmerich de Vattel’s treatise “The Law of Nations or the Principles of Natural Law (1758)”
At the time of their writing the Constitution in 1787, the founders were not so quick to forget the bloody revolution this nation endured so as to sever the bonds of a tyrannical government that they would not institute a safeguard to prevent a subject of England from once again enslaving them. It is with great foresight that the Framers affixed a three-tiered security measure to thwart such an occurrence. They looked to Vattel’s “The Law of Nations” when they set forth the limitations reserved for the sole position of the leader of the nation and commander in chief of the military forces. In Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution, only a “natural born Citizen” is eligible to be President of the United States:

No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

This precaution precluded dual allegiance. It is not a discretionary right.

POWERS OF CONGRESS

And lest you dismiss Vattel as just some ol’ Swiss philosopher:

Article 1, section 8 defines the powers of Congress…

To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations;

Barack Hussein Obama by his own admission was a British subject at birth.

From FightTheSmears.com:

When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4, 1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.’s children.

Patrimonial lineage was not a quaint notion at the time the founders wrote into law the protections of the nation. It was well established, and evidence for such discourse can also be found as early as 1640 in Thomas Hobbes’ “The Elements of Law Natural and Politic” where Hobbes states:

. . . every man by the law of nature, hath right or propriety to his own body, the child ought rather to be the propriety of the mother (of whose body it is part, till the time of separation)than of the father . . .

Vattel unequivocally defines “natural born Citizen” as:

{those born in the country, of parents who are citizens}

Book 1, Chapter XIX
§ 212. Citizens and natives.

The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.

THE JURISTS

John Jay, one of the Founding Fathers of the United States, President of the Continental Congress from 1778 to 1779 and, from 1789 to 1795, the first Chief Justice of the United States so poignantly acknowledges the singular point which lies at the heart of this issue in his letter to George Washington, the presiding officer of the Constitutional Convention on July 25, 1787.
Jay wrote:

Permit me to hint whether it would not be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government, and to declare expressly that the Command in Chief of the American army shall not be given to nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen.

In the writings of another great jurist, Chief Justice John Marshall, we find the nexus of the natural born Citizen issue incontrovertibly answered. As Chief Justice for 34 years, John Marshall had a profound impact on the Supreme Court and its balance of power with the other two branches of government whereby judicial review was a recognized instrument used to strike down laws that violate the Constitution.

Chief Justice John Marshall writes:
Naturalization, under the laws of the United States, confers upon the subject of it all the rights and privileges of a native citizen, excepting that of becoming president of the United States.
The Frances 12 U.S. 335 (U.S. 1814)
A naturalized citizen is indeed made a citizen under an act of Congress, but the act does not proceed to give, to regulate, or to prescribe his capacities. He becomes a member of the society, possessing all the rights of a native citizen, and standing, in the view of the constitution, on the footing of a native. The constitution does not authorize Congress to enlarge or abridge those rights. The simple power of the national Legislature, is to prescribe a uniform rule of naturalization, and the exercise of this power exhausts it, so far as respects the individual. The constitution then takes him up, and, among other rights, extends to him the capacity of suing in the Courts of the United States, precisely under the same circumstances under which a native might sue. He is [*828] distinguishable in nothing from a native citizen, except so far as the constitution makes the distinction. The law makes none.

Osborn v. President, Directors & Co. of Bank, 22 U.S. 738, 828 (U.S. 1824)

The significance of the fact that Marshall issues the warning that {the constitution does not authorize Congress to enlarge or abridge those rights} cannot be understated. Secondly, the opinion lays the foundation for subsequent cases addressing “natural born Citizen” status including United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898) where the 14th Amendment confers “citizenship” status while never granting “natural born Citizen” status. And thirdly, the opinion is important because it reminds Congress that they must not breach the explicit boundaries set forth in the Tenth Amendment.

JUSTICE DELAYED IS JUSTICE DENIED

On Thursday April 15th, 2010; U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas told a House subcommittee that when it comes to determining whether a person born outside the 50 states can serve as U.S. president, the high court is “evading” the issue.

Let us take JUDICIAL NOTICE on how Chief Justice Marshall weighs in on this one:

It is most true that this court will not take jurisdiction if it should not: but it is equally true, that it must take jurisdiction if it should. The judiciary cannot, as the legislature may, avoid a measure because it approaches the confines of the constitution. We cannot pass it by because it is doubtful. With whatever doubts, with whatever difficulties, a case may be attended, we must decide it, if it be brought before us. We have no more right to decline the exercise of jurisdiction which is given, than to usurp that which is not given. The one or the other would be TREASON to the constitution. Questions may occur which we would gladly avoid; but we cannot avoid them. All we can do is, to exercise our best judgment, and conscientiously to perform our duty. In doing this, on the present occasion, we find this tribunal invested with appellate jurisdiction in all cases arising under the constitution and laws of the United States. We find no exception to this grant, and we cannot insert one.
Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. 264 (1821)

TREASON

It looks as though there is plenty of blame to go around. While it appears that no one wants to address the issue of Obama’s ineligibility, Congress actually already has. Numerous attempts have been made to redefine the term natural born Citizen with a flurry in just the last few years, as outlined below or here.

– FIVE ATTEMPTS TO RE-DEFINE NATURAL BORN CITIZEN SINCE 2001 –

IGNORANCE IS NOT A DEFENSE

Ignorantia juris non excusat or Ignorantia legis neminem excusat

Latin for “ignorance of the law excuses no one”, which is a legal principle holding that a person who is unaware of a law may not escape liability for violating that law merely because he or she was unaware of its content.

When Nancy Pelosi signed the OFFICIAL CERTIFICATION OF NOMINATION’s for the DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, she became party to conspiracy to commit fraud. In the state of Hawaii the certification explicitly proclaims that the candidates were “legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution” yet simultaneously on the same day before the same signed witnesses, Pelosi signed certifications for the other states that merely say the candidates were “duly nominated”. Which is it Nancy? Either they are…or they’re not.

A copy of the certification issued from the office of the Federal Election Commission in the State of Georgia can be viewed below or here.

2008 DNC Presidential nomination certificate without constitutionally eligible provision – Georgia
2008 DNC Presidential nomination certificate with constitutionally eligible provision – Hawaii
Therefore, Nancy either knows Barack Obama was not eligible and had the wording “eligible” removed from the certifications in states where it legally wasn’t required in order to mitigate her liability (fraud), or she intended all along to swear under oath if necessary that she “can’t recall” ceremoniously signing the candidates were actually vetted. You be the judge.

OBOTS & JINO (Journalists In Name Only)

For Anderson Cooper, Bill O’Reilly, Glenn Beck and all of you OBOTS, the musings of Thomas Hobbes eloquently illustrates your syndrome:

There is a fault of the mind called by the Greeks Amathia, which is INDOCIBILITY, or difficulty of being taught; the which must needs arise from a false opinion that they know already the truth of that which is called in question. For certainly men are not otherwise so unequal in capacity as the evidence is unequal of what is taught by the mathematicians, and what is commonly discoursed of in other books: and therefore if the minds of men were all of white paper, they would almost equally be disposed to acknowledge whatsoever should be in right method, and right ratiocination delivered unto them. But when men have once acquiesced in untrue opinions, and registered them as authentical records in their minds; it is no less impossible to speak intelligibly to such men, than to write legibly upon a paper already scribbled over. The immediate cause therefore of indocibility, is prejudice; and of prejudice, false opinion of our own knowledge.

TURNING A BLIND EYE

It takes uncommon valor to disobey unlawful orders originating at the very top of the chain of command…the Commander-in-Chief.

These are true American heroes not soon to be forgotten:

Cmdr. Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., USNR (Ret.)
Lt. Cmdr.Walt Fitzpatrick III USN (Ret.)
Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin
Maj. Stefan Frederick Cook
Capt. Connie Rhodes
1st Lt. Scott Easterling

They swore a solemn oath:

I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservations or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God.
(DA Form 71, 1 August 1959, for officers.)

These patriots have remained true to their loyalty.

USURPER

Because Barack Hussein Obama has refused to validate his authority to hold the office of the President of the United States and Commander-in-Chief, all laws he has signed will one day be overturned and become null and void. The epic saga comprising the period of Obama’s presidency will forever be overshadowed by the unprecedented legal struggles he beset upon this country.

THE DIE IS CAST

On April 23, 1775 King George III of Great Britain declared, “The die is now cast. The colonies must either submit or triumph“. A defining moment seen as a turning point for the fate of a nation because the King would refuse to negotiate compromises that might have averted, or at least forestalled, the American Revolution.

Lo the die has been cast … either the Constitution is the law of the land, or it is not. As more and more Patriots hear the words “All Rise” and then do so only to be told we have no standing, a reckoning will assuredly occur. The citizens beholden to this “unchecked power known as tyranny” will one day Rise Up en masse and the courts will see that “We The People” truly do have “Standing”.

Pixel Patriot
5/11/2010

####