CNN: Trump Supporter Rips Soetoro (Obama), Cruz, and Rubio Over Article II Ineligibility

CNN: Trump Supporter Rips Soetoro (Obama)Cruz, and Rubio Over Constitutional Article II Ineligibility

See CNN video clip embedded below. Mr. Dan Ray stated it correctly and precisely during this CNN interview. Neither Cruz, Rubio, or Obama are eligible to be the President and Commander in Chief per Article II of our U.S. Constitution. And in addition neither is eligible to be the Vice President either per the last sentence of the 12th Amendment to our Constitution ratified in 1804. Obama has thus far gotten away with his usurpation of office. We cannot allow Cruz or Rubio to do it again – either as President or Vice President.

Watch video, read discussion, and comment here:

See the following link to learn more about the dual-Citizenship and allegiances at birth for Cruz and Rubio:

# # # #

Cruz and Rubio were Citizens at Birth of a Foreign Country (Ted of 2 Foreign Countries) – Both NOT a “natural born Citizen” of the United States

Get PDF Copy of Cruz Foreign Citizenship Facts Petition Here — Get PDF Copy of Rubio Foreign Citizenship Facts Petition Here

A Simple Euler Logic Diagram Shows Logical Relationship of “natural born Citizens” to Other Type “Citizens” of the United States. Only a “natural born Citizen” Can Constitutionally be the President and Commander in Chief or the Vice-President. Click on Image For More Information.

Read this: The Who What When Where Why and How of the “natural born Citizen” Term in Our U.S. Constitution

More historical and legal papers and analysis on the true constitutional meaning and intent of the founders and framers of the presidential eligibility clause, natural born Citizen, in our U.S. Constitution can be found at this link:

CDR Charles Kerchner, P.E. (Retired)
Lehigh Valley PA USA

P.S. Also read this essay regarding the constitutional term in the presidential eligibility clause “natural born Citizen” and basic logic, i.e., trees are plants but not all plants are trees. Natural born Citizens are a subset of “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” but not all “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” are “natural born Citizens”: … AND … Also watch this video by the renowned constitutional scholar Dr. Herb Titus — Part I: and Part II:

ProtectOurLiberty WebsiteSpaceMy BlogSpaceDocs Collections Re Obama SpaceMy YouTube SpaceMost Recent Full Pg Ad SpaceAd Archives SpaceFliers/Handouts SpaceBlock Ads SpaceSheriff to Sheriffs – Sheriff Kit Project SpaceGet A Sheriff Kit SpaceInterviews-Audio/Print SpaceBooks SpaceGoat’s Ledge SpaceContact Me


3 thoughts on “CNN: Trump Supporter Rips Soetoro (Obama), Cruz, and Rubio Over Article II Ineligibility”

  1. I have found a much easier and faster way to PROVE ted is INELIGIBLE, and there is NO ARGUMENT against it, nor is there ANY argument about the definition of terms used!

    Click on this link, read the syllabus, and see if it sounds JUST LIKE ted’s circumstances. Then look to see how the SCOTUS ruled!

    According to this ruling (made just 9 years before ted’s birth!), ted is either a NATURALIZED USA citizen, or he isn’t a USA citizen AT ALL!

    EITHER WAY he is NOT eligible to be the POTUS or VPOTUS, no matter WHAT is the definition of “natural born citizen!”

    Get this out to EVERYBODY!

    It blows every other argument straight out of the water!!

    [Editor’s note: I believe this case has been discussed extensively by Atty Mario Apuzzo in his blog. Please visit there and join the discussion there via the comments thread for the most recent blog post re this case. That is the best way to spread the word on this case and to fully vet it. Here is the link to his blog: ]

  2. To date many lawsuits have been issued challenging Obama on not being a Natural Born Citizen. These lawsuits have been trashed and thrown out of court for lack of standing. To prove standing for an individual is near impossible because they have to prove the current person occupying POTUS has done them harm. HOWEVER, in Art. 1 Section 8 we find that CONGRESS has been ordered to prosecute all violations of Vattel’s Law of Nations wherein “Natural Born Citizen” is defined. So it is Congress, not the individual, who has standing to prosecute POTUS in court. Therefore, a better strategy than filing lawsuits against the POTUS would be to file a lawsuit against Congress alleging that they have not kept their oaths of office in that they have NOT done their job, allowing harm to this nation in the process, and should immediately arrest ANY person who is criminally and fraudulently holding an office they are ineligible to hold.

    [Editor’s note: CDR Kerchner (Ret) did exactly that and more in his federal lawsuit Kerchner et al v Obama and Congress et al in Jan 2009. It was turned away at all levels of the court system up to including the U.S. Supreme Court on the “standing” technicality aka “duck the issue” evade the question technique. See: The court can find standing for virtually anything when it wants to and not find it when it wants to. Our judicial system is operating politically instead of judicially on this issue of the “natural born Citizen” term in our U.S. Constitution. See this link for more on the 20 Jan 2009 lawsuit CDR Kerchner (Ret) brought against Congress and others: ]

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: