Constitutional Eligibility Lawsuit Filed Against Ted Cruz in TX [Get a Copy at Link Below]

Click on image to take the Three Legged Stool Test for "natural born Citizen"
Click on image to take the Three Legged Stool Test for “natural born Citizen”

Constitutional Eligibility Lawsuit Filed Against Ted Cruz in Texas [Get a Copy at Link Below]

Download a copy of the federal lawsuit filed in TX here:

Read the report and comment here:

This TX lawsuit adds to those already filed in IL, FL, MD, and VT:

Neither Ted Cruz or Marco Rubio who are two active candidates [and the candidate Jindal whose campaign is in suspension] were at birth born to two U.S. Citizen parents in the USA and thus all three are NOT a “natural born Citizen” of the United States with sole allegiance at birth to only the USA. Each of the above were born with citizenship in more than one country and thus have divided allegiance and foreign influences on them by and at birth. No matter what you think of their politics, like them or not, they are NOT constitutionally eligible for the office they seek. Obama has shown us what one can get when one allows a person with divided allegiances via birth into the Oval Office. The “natural born Citizen” clause in our Constitution is a national security clause and must be defended and upheld as originally understood and intended. We must defend the Constitution no matter which political party seeks to subvert it.

CDR Charles Kerchner, P.E. (Retired)

P.S. Here is a chart which lists and explains the five (5) Citizenship terms used in the U.S. Constitution.
P.P.S. Being a “born Citizen” or “Citizen at Birth” is not identically the same as a being a “natural born Citizen”.
P.P.P.S. Obama is NOT a “natural born Citizen of the United States” to U.S. Constitutional standards. Read this essay regarding the legal term of art “natural born Citizen” and basic logic, i.e., trees are plants but not all plants are trees. Natural born Citizens are a subset of “born Citizens (citizens at birth)”. All “natural born Citizens” are “born Citizens (citizens at birth) but not all “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” are “natural born Citizens”: Also read the “Three Legged Stool Test” for Natural Born Citizen … AND … Also watch this video by the renowned constitutional scholar Dr. Herb Titus:

2 thoughts on “Constitutional Eligibility Lawsuit Filed Against Ted Cruz in TX [Get a Copy at Link Below]”

  1. Born in Yokohama, Japan. Father U.S. Citizen and Army Officer. Mother a Texan! OK U.S. Citizen. This is personal!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    [Editor’s note: Under “Natural Law” you are eligible to serve as Pres or VP since you were born across the seas in the service of your country, just like a diplomat. See sections 211, 212, and in particular 217 of the legal treatise (along with the Bible) the founders and framers used to justify the revolution against England and to write the founding documents: Don’t let the duplicitous media confuse the issue of what we Constitutionalists are saying and/or believe. Read Vattel Vol.1 or at a minimum Chapter 19 of Vol.1. and all my writings and those at: The American electorate is being dumbed down to allow anyone the political parties want to be president to run, eligible or not. People with green cards are on the ballot of some parties. The “natural born Citizen” is the children of Citizens born in the country, or under the flag of our country while the parents are overseas serving their country. Your description fits what the founders and framers intended. ]

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: