Broadcaster Howie Carr WRKO Boston: Obama Says Was Born In Kenya; Then He Was Born In Hawaii; Which Is It?

Click image to learn about Obama himself and many others stating prior to his filing to run for President that Obama was born in Kenya
Click image to learn about Obama himself and many others stating prior to his filing to run for President that Obama was born in Kenya

Radio Broadcaster Howie Carr on WRKO Boston: Obama Says Was Born In Kenya; Then He Was Born In Hawaii; Which Is It?

Listen and comment here:

The Collection — statements over many years by Obama and others that he was born in Kenya:

# # # #

Click on image for details
Click on Image for Details about Obama’s Forged Draft Registration Card.
Click on the Image for Details about Obama's Forged Birth Certificate and Selective Service (Draft) Registration Form
Click on the Image for Details about Obama’s Forged Birth Certificate.

Download a “Sheriff’s Kit” package of evidence of Obama ID document fraud:

Copy of AZ Chief Investigator Michael Zullo’s sworn affidavit attesting that Obama’s ID docs are forged:

Copy of Evidence that Obama’s Selective Service (Draft) Registration Card is forged:

Maricopa County AZ Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse Investigative Reports into Obama’s Forged ID Docs:

[Sheriff Mack – Obama ID Documents Are Fake!]

[Sheriff Arpaio – Congress Must Act!]

Obama the Enigma: Click on the image to learn more about Obama he does not want you to know.
Obama the Enigma: Click on the image to learn more about Obama he does not want you to know.

A warning from the past — some conspiracies are very real and are also large and well organized and in process for a long time. Such is the nature of Communist activities in the USA. The target of the seditious political conspiracy we are currently faced with is to destroy our U.S. Constitution, our Republic, our culture, and our military. Remember this quote from history: “We must now face the harsh truth that the objectives of communism are being steadily advanced because many of us do not recognize the means used to advance them. … The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a Conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists. The American mind simply has not come to a realization of the evil which has been introduced into our midst.” Quote by: J. Edgar Hoover former FBI director. Source: Elks Magazine (August 1956).

Marxist/Communists are trained to lie. It’s their modus operandi to deceive their true objectives. Obama is not just a pathological liar, he’s an ideological liar:

CDR Charles Kerchner, P.E. (Retired)
Lehigh Valley PA USA

P.S. Also read this essay regarding the legal term of art “natural born Citizen” and basic logic, i.e., trees are plants but not all plants are trees. Natural born Citizens are a subset of “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” but not all “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” are “natural born Citizens”: … AND … Also watch this video by the renowned constitutional scholar Dr. Herb Titus:

3 thoughts on “Broadcaster Howie Carr WRKO Boston: Obama Says Was Born In Kenya; Then He Was Born In Hawaii; Which Is It?”

  1. “What difference, at this point, does it make….???…where he was born,,,,???…. BOTH the left and the right have “resorted elsewhere” in a myriad of mind numbing convoluted linguistic interpretations of foreign laws and political philosophizers to the point that the question of who is or is not a U.S. natural born Citizen is more AMBIGUOUS in 2014 than it was in 2008.

    Now, with SR 511, we have “foreign born U.S. natural born Citizens”, in the sense of the Senate, “eligible” for the Office of POTUS, notwithstanding the FACT that the 3rd U.S. Congress repealed a provision that provided for the same in the 1790 Act.

    The “0” is said to be eligible due to his birth in HI. to one “Citizen” parent, but it’s not clear if any U.S. Citizens are necessary by virtue of the erroneous “Jus Soli” interpretation of “subject to the Jurisdiction”.

    So, when push comes to shove under the current majority of the National Electorate a U.S. natural born Citizen is whoever wins 270 Electoral College Votes with the vision in sight of it soon being a simple majority vote with the demise of the Electoral College which is no longer operating as intended anyway.

    The Preamble to the Constitution, which is NOT Law, but an acceptable reference regarding Constitutional Ideals, Principles and Intends says, truncated to the pertinent part;

    “We the people of the United States, in order to … secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

    The assumption taken from this portion of the Preamble is that the Founding generation anticipated that their children would become members of the Constitutional society at birth at the very least, thereby assuming that the “uniform Rule” of the Clause contained in the 1st Articles of the soon to be ratified Constitution would provide for such an outcome.

    The Constitution, having delegated to the Congress the roll of expressing the political concept of “naturalization” in “an uniform Rule”, that then MUST also make U.S. Citizens of the children at birth when born to those who were made U.S. Citizens by the Ratification of the COTUS in order for the INTENT expressed in the Preamble to be realized.

    Federal Laws are those Laws that are made in pursuance of the Constitution. Pursuance in this context means in “furtherance of the objectives and principles of the Constitution”

    At Article 1 Section 8 Clause 4 of the enumerated powers provisions the Congress is given the plenary power over U,S. Citizenship with the mandate; ” …To establish a uniform rule of naturalization, … throughout the United States; … ”

    Establish = to found, start, create, begin, launch, form, inaugurate,

    Uniform = unchanging, unvarying even, unbroken, undeviating,

    Rule = in law, a guiding principle from which laws derive
    their authority, (doctrine, tenet, canon)

    Naturalization = a Political concept of making persons
    members of a political body at birth or otherwise.

    In its words this provision mandated that the Congress establish the legal basis for the U.S. Common Law on U.S. Citizenship.

    Judge Thomas Anderson of USDC for the Western District of Tennessee Western Division in Case 2:12-cv-02143-STA; as he HELD in a Ruling on Motions in a Case at Bar;

    “… ANALYSIS .. It is undisputed that the material fact at issue in this case is whether under the circumstances of President Obama’s birth, the President is a “natural born citizen,” a term set out in the United States Constitution and construed under federal law. “


    “…The federal issue presented is obviously contested in this case. Likewise, the Court holds that the federal issue is substantial …”[pg 6/7/8]

    In the 1st case I filed I used the word “distill” when trying to describe how a U.S. natural born Citizen could be found by looking at the U.S. Laws on the question.

    I used the wrong word which held an unfortunate connotation to “blood”.

    The correct word IS “CONSTRUE” as in construing the statutory construction of a provision and applying the rules of statutory interpretation in order to determine the effects of its words as well as what those effects then require.

    Niether Jus Soli or Jus Sanquinis are within the U.S. uniform Rule of Citizenship as historically practiced..

    U.S. Citizenship in the 1st instant was derived DIRECTLY from the COTUS upon its Ratification and perpetuates under the Uniform Rule that U.S. Citizenship begets a U.S. Citizen child, no matter where in the world the child is or may have been born.

    The only circumstances ever provided for under U.S. Federal Law for a child to be “considered as” a U.S. natural born Citizen was when born to the wife of a U.S. Citizen father while “beyond the seas or out of the limits of the U.S.”

    Many stop there and do not deconstruct the statutory construction of the provision in light of the context of the Act in whole.

    To “Consider” anything “as if” it is ‘something else’, a ‘something else’ must exist under other circumstances. The intent of the provision was to provide Citizenship status to a child born while abroad, therefore “place” is the ONLY distinction being addressed that separates the child from the ‘something’ he is being “considered as”. The ONLY place that is distinguished from beyond the seas and limits of the U.S. is WITHIN the limits of the U.S.

    This conforms with the implied intent noted in the Preamble and is consistent with the provision concerning a newly naturalized “alien’s” children, who are MADE U.S. Citizens concurrent with the alien father, whether they were native or foreign born.

    The 1795 repeal of the “foreign born U.S. natural born Citizen” repealed only that which provided for a “foreign born U.S. natural born Citizen”, with such children thereafter being U.S. Citizens “as if” naturalized so.

    Jus Soli,State Citizenship existed prior to the establishment of the COTUS, and the 1790 Act, and some States continued the practice until the words of the 1795 Act were acknowledged;

    ” ….(truncated to reflect current statutes)……. person, may be admitted to become a citizen of the United States, or any of them, on the following conditions, and not otherwise: —

    The 14th Amendments “collective naturalization declaratory born Citizen provision” is erroneously construed as if being a “Jus Soli” provision.

    The Constitution has NO “soil”, (less and except 10 sq.mi), what it does have is the CONSENT of the governed.

    In order for the 14th Amd to provide U.S. Citizenship to those emancipated persons made STATELESS by the emancipation its would have to retroactively naturalize those persons as if from birth assuming the CONSENT to do so.

    Those persons were “subject to the U.S. Jurisdiction because they were “subject to NO OTHER jurisdiction, at birth or otherwise.

    U.S. Jurisdiction extends ONLY to ITS Citizens and the several States as parties to it by CONSENT, (with certain “obligations” arising FROM that CONSENT). The ONLY Jurisdiction of the U.S. over “alien Foreign National”, insofar as citizenship is concerned,, are those Statutes concerning “immigration, naturalization and or deportations”.

    The ONLY other U.S. Federal Law that has had a direct effect on the birth of a U.S. natural born Citizen is the 1922 Cable Act, aka, the Women’s Independent Citizenship Act which removes the necessity of marriage between the TWO (2) U.S. Citizen parents of a U.S. natural born Citizen.

    A U.S.natural born citizen,” a term set out in the United States Constitution and construed under federal law. “

    1. The Statutory Interpretations I offer as construed from the Statutory Constructions, beginning with the Preamble, COTUS and 1790, et seq Acts and ending with the most current 8 USC codifications of Congressional Acts conforms with and is consistent with ALL natural law precepts as expressed by Vattel, and I dare say Aristotle, whose shoulders Vattel stood upon.

      Why is it no one gives credit to the Framers of the COTUS for ESTABLISHING an uniform Rule of U.S. Citizenship that was consistent with ALL natural law precepts as expressed by Vattel….????

      Look at the combined EFFECTS of the provisions of the 1790 Act and tell me if they do NOT conform to the spirit of Vattels view, except for the temporary existence of a “foreign born Natural born Citizen, undoubtedly providing for the many U.S. Citizen families working abroad upon U.S. interests.

      [Editor’s note: The 1790 law was repealed within years of its enactment. It would have only comported with Vattel if the law had stated individuals born overseas to U.S. Citizen parents who are abroad directly in the service of their nation, i.e., diplomats and military. That law did not say that and thus it did not comport with Vattel and that is likely why it was repealed after the founders and framers realized their mistake. You forget to mention that. USC 8 is statutory (positive) law, not natural law. Watch this video for the impact of Vattel and natural law on the founders and framers when they established a new more perfect union for our national government via the U.S. Constitution: USC 8 grants basic citizenship by man-made law to people who have very many special birth circumstances and does not conform with the natural law precepts of Vattel as to who by the laws of nature is a natural born Citizen of a country. Like the 14th amendment it creates Citizens, not natural born Citizens which can only be created by the laws of nature, per natural law. Two citizens as parents then can go on to procreate natural born Citizens, as defined by Vattel. USC 8 does not even contain the term natural born Citizen. Read this essay as to why USC 8 has no relevance to the presidential eligibility clause and does not even mention natural born Citizen: ]

Comments are closed.