Not having an honest debate with a liberal

Not having an honest debate with a liberal | by David Jennings | @ Canadian Free Press

On New Year’s Day, Kyle Becker, writing at Independent Journal Review, published the amusing but true list of eight things liberals do to avoid having an honest debate. Given that his focus was on the American left,  I wanted to pull the camera lens out, so to speak, and have a look at this from a broader perspective including my own experiences and what the British do differently.  The list of eight things liberals do to avoid having an honest debate – according to Kyle Becker:

  1. Ad Hominem (Name-Calling aka “You’re a Racist!” etc.)
  2. Distracting (aka “Pivoting” aka “Changing the Subject”)
  3. Somebody Else Did It Before (aka Two Wrongs Make a Right)
  4. Obama Doesn’t Know What’s Going On (Or Did I Do That?)
  5. It’s a Far-Right Conspiracy (Or The Koch Brothers Did It)
  6. You Heard That on Faux News
  7. Argumentum Ad Misericordium (Or “Do it for the Children”)
  8. It’s Bush’s Fault

Continue reading here:

# # # #

Another article on the gas-lighting and other disinformation tactics used by the far-left and Obots:

And of course a must know about and read when dealing with Obots and the far-left — their tactics bible — Saul Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals”:

Marxist/Communists are trained to lie. It’s their modus operandi.  Obama is not just a pathological liar, he’s an ideological liar:


# # # #

CDR Charles Kerchner, P.E. (Retired)
Lehigh Valley PA USA

P.S. Also read this essay regarding the legal term of art “natural born Citizen” and basic logic, i.e., trees are plants but not all plants are trees. Natural born Citizens are a subset of “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” but not all “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” are “natural born Citizens”: … AND …


One thought on “Not having an honest debate with a liberal”

Comments are closed.