Obama Ineligibility Presentation in Dallas TX by Rudy Davis

Click on image for more details about Obama's constitutional ineligibility and ID fraud
Click on image for more details about Obama’s constitutional ineligibility and ID fraud
Click on image for information about Rudy Davis' videos
Click on image for information about Rudy Davis’ videos

Obama Ineligibility Presentation in Dallas TX by Rudy Davis

.
.
Part 1 of 2: LoneStar1776 gives an Obama ineligibility presentaton, Oct. 22nd, 2013
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-fLTQDUuCd0
.

.

.

.

Part 2 of 2: LoneStar1776 gives an Obama ineligibility presentaton, Oct. 22nd, 2013
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J351hZDpvPA

# # # #

CDR Charles Kerchner, P.E. (Retired)
Lehigh Valley PA USA
http://www.protectourliberty.org/
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/
http://www.scribd.com/protectourliberty/collections/

P.S. Also read this essay regarding the legal term of art “natural born Citizen” and basic logic, i.e., trees are plants but not all plants are trees.  Natural born Citizens are a subset of “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” but not all “born Citizens (citizens at birth)” are “natural born Citizens”: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/06/20/of-natural-born-citizens-and-citizens-at-birth-and-basic-logic-trees-are-plants-but-not-all-plants-are-trees-natural-born-citizens-nbc-are-citizens-at-birth-cab-but-not-all-cab/ … AND … http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html

Advertisements

7 thoughts on “Obama Ineligibility Presentation in Dallas TX by Rudy Davis”

  1. Dear Cdr Kerchner,

    Recently I argued the US Constitution Art.II.Sec.1.Cla.5 eligibility issue with an ardent Sen. Cruz supporter. It was unproductive. Herein after I refer to Sen Cruz as Mr. Cruz.

    My argument I believed was sound: 1) Mr Cruz is Canadian under Canadian law by virtue of his birth on Canadian soil. This is documented and not disputed. 2) Mr Cruz is American by virtue of being born to an American mother, provided he makes that claim in a fashion conforming to US law. 3) By action of Cuban law in effect at the time of his birth, Mr. Cruz is Cuban having been born to a Cuban father, albeit an exile.

    I argue that Mr. Cruz fails “natural born” on two counts: 1) he was born on undisputably foreign soil 2) one of his parents was not an American citizen at the time of Mr. Cruz’s birth.

    My question is what is the Federal court case which defines “natural born “? How high did it go?

    [Editor’s answer: See the relevant U.S. Supreme Court cases and the history and legal facts regarding the “natural born Citizen” presidential eligibility clause at this site: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html ]

    I f you have a cite on your website for the case I will find it later today so if that is the case I don’t need a reply.

    Make no mistake: I admire Sen Cruz. I like his efforts on behalf of our Republic. I don’t want to pursue a false candidate such as former Sen Santorum.

    This is making me a heritic in some quarters. Once people see the logic of my argument, we become ensnared in unproductive discussions about what is “natural born” and who is the authority.

    Thank you so much for indulging me and for your continuing work.

    Cheers Chris Hisgen Las Vegas Nevada 89107 USA

    1. See the relevant U.S. Supreme Court cases and the history and legal facts regarding the “natural born Citizen” presidential eligibility clause at this site: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html Also see: http://www.protectourliberty.org and http://www.scribd.com/collections/3301209/Papers-Discussing-National-Born-Citizen-Meaning-to-Constitutional-Standards

      The leadership of both major political parties want to destroy and ignore the “natural born Citizen” (NBC) presidential eligibility clause so they can run people they consider to be politically attractive to appeal to the recent legal immigrants and illegal immigrants. Attempts to amend the Constitution regarding Article II NBC clause have been brought forward by the leadership of both parties and they never got any traction since they know once it would be openly discussed as to the national security implications of removing the NBC clause, We the People would never approve it. You can see the various Congressional attempts to delete or dilute the NBC clause at this site: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html#Attempts%20to%20Redefine%20or%20Amend%20Article%20II Read this essay of mine of how the fix was in by both political parties for the 2008 election to simply ignore the true historical and legal meaning of Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, the presidential eligibility (NBC) clause: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2010/01/24/i-believe-the-fix-was-in-for-the-2008-election-and-the-cover-up-is-still-going-strong-the-perfect-storm-for-a-constitutional-crisis/

      CDR Kerchner (Ret)
      http://www.protectourliberty.org

    2. The leadership of both major political parties want to destroy and ignore the “natural born Citizen” (NBC) presidential eligibility clause so they can run people they consider to be politically attractive to appeal to the recent legal immigrants and illegal immigrants. Attempts to amend the Constitution regarding Article II NBC clause have been brought forward by the leadership of both parties and they never got any traction since they know once it would be openly discussed as to the national security implications of removing the NBC clause, We the People would never approve it. You can see the various Congressional attempts to delete or dilute the NBC clause at this site: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html#Attempts%20to%20Redefine%20or%20Amend%20Article%20II Read this essay of mine of how the fix was in by both political parties for the 2008 election to simply ignore the true historical and legal meaning of Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, the presidential eligibility (NBC) clause: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2010/01/24/i-believe-the-fix-was-in-for-the-2008-election-and-the-cover-up-is-still-going-strong-the-perfect-storm-for-a-constitutional-crisis/

      CDR Kerchner (Ret)
      http://www.protectourliberty.org

  2. John Boehner is America’s most serious problem at the moment for not allowing congressman to bring to the floor of the house proof that Obama is a fraud buy commiting at min ID Fraud. We need to write Boehner a demand he begin a congressional hearing on the discoveries found by Sheriff Joe and Mike Zullo of the cold case posse and others like Jerome Corsi for their testimony. This is the only way Daryl Isa can proceed. We must put Boehner on record for knowing what we also know. If he chooses not to act we demand he step down as speaker.

Comments are closed.