A Suggested Narrative – How Obama is Born in Kenya and yet has a Hawaiian Birth Registration Record

Click on Image for the Evidence

A Suggested Narrative – How Obama is physically Born in Kenya but still Obtains Hawaiian Birth Registration Record and Birth Announcement Ads in Two Newspapers.  There Was No Conspiracy Beyond Obama’s Grandma Lying to the Hawaii Birth Registrar to Get Her New Grandson Much Coveted U.S. Citizenship. It Happens Today and It Happened Then in Various States.  It Was Easy Back in 1961 Using the Very Lax Hawaiian Birth Registration Laws. The Most Lax in the Entire USA. And Any Birth Registration (Real or Falsely Claimed and Not Discovered) Generated the Newspaper Ads Announcing Birth Registrations Each Week.

By:  CDR Kerchner (Ret)    Originally Posted Online:  Sat Jul 11 2009 @ 4:13 pm       Updated:  Sun Mar 04 2012 @ 10:00 pm

A comment about my narrative – How Obama is Born in Kenya but still obtains a Birth Certificate (BC) in Hawaii and/or a Certification of Live Birth (COLB):

As a genealogist of many decades experience and familiar with putting together such things as proven data, unproven data, records, statements of relatives, and other tidbits about a person over time to form a plausible narrative to explain those “facts” given the information in hand  at the moment of writing, and always subject to update as more facts are discovered which support or dispute the suggested narrative, I cogitated on the “facts” about Obama as known to me from early 2008 until the early summer of 2009 and finally wrote this in June 2009 to try and explain things.  I thought I’d re-post this suggested narrative, with updates, to explain events we’ve seen to date regarding the Usurper in the Oval Office. If you have Twitter, Facebook, and email lists, feel free to “tweet” or forward this narrative to others. Thanks.

A proposed narrative to explain the various seemingly conflicting statements by various people made about Obama’s birth in Kenya and birth records in Hawaii:

Underage U.S. teenager in Hawaii gets pregnant via a significantly older married man and foreign national from Kenya which would have been a very unusual event in 1961.

Mother of teenager is in total shock over the event as would have been many mothers of teenage girls getting pregnant in 1961 and says to her daughter you have ruined your life and will make going to college much harder for yourself and convinces the teenage girl to accept the suggestion of Obama Sr. that she should go to Kenya in the 2nd trimester or early 3rd trimester of her pregnancy with the plan to give up the baby to the Kenyan natural family and relatives of the natural father of the child to be raised in Kenya by them.

Mother travels to Kenya either directly from Hawaii or via Canada. If she was indeed married to Obama Sr. as claimed she would have been able to get a British passport as the wife of a British Subject, Obama Sr.  Traveling via Canada would allow her easier access to Kenya since as the spouse of a British Subject she would be flying from one British Commonwealth nation, Canada, to a British Colony. That would make travel to and entry into Kenya much easier. And getting into and out of Canada to and from the USA for an American citizen (the mother) was easy back in 1961.

The Kenyan paternal step-grandmother of the child attends Obama’s birth in Kenyan hospital in Mombasa Kenya and is ready to take custody of the child and raise the child for the foot-loose and fancy-free natural father with multiple wives. [Note: The Kenyan paternal step-grandmother Sarah Obama has stated she was there at the birth of Obama II in Kenya and held him in her arms in Mombasa Hospital and also stated at another time that the President of the United States passed through her hands. The birth in Kenya of Obama II is corroborated by many statements by Kenyan government officials such as the Kenyan Ambassador to the USA who stated on a radio show that Obama was born in Kenya. Also several members of the Kenyan Assembly stated such on the record and it is recorded in the minutes of their Assembly meetings.] Many more examples stating Obama was born in Kenya such his own published biography in 1991 and by many other people and many other publications over many years prior to Obama deciding to run for President in 2007 are found at this link.

After the birth of her child in Kenya, the U.S. teenage mother is supposed to return to Hawaii without her child, or fly directly to Washington State, or fly to Washington State via Vancouver, Canada, leaving the child with the natural father’s family in Kenya and restart her life back in Hawaii and/or in college in Washington State minus the child … and go to college, re-starting her life anew. In 1961, a pregnant teenage girl giving up a child to restart their lives anew was not unusual.

But nature and maternal instincts throws the plan a curve ball. Maternal instincts kick in and mother cannot leave the baby in Kenya, either due to pure maternal instincts or in seeing the poor conditions in Kenya that her child would be raised in with a mostly absentee father over there. Thus she changes her mom’s plan and she takes the baby and Kenyan hospital birth certificate issued by the Mombasa Hospital to the American Embassy or consulate in Kenya and shows them the Kenyan Birth Certificate for her child and “explains” the baby was born unexpectedly in Kenya while there visiting her “husband’s” family. U.S. officials then stamp her passport as traveling with an infant child.

Mother gets on plane or ship carrying the child and travels back to Hawaii and appears at the airport or port upon arrival with the new baby in tow, or to Washington State, or to Vancouver, Canada, and calls her mother in Hawaii telling her what she did, much to the shock of her mother, the child’s U.S. grandmother. Baby easily is passed through U.S. entry officials due to the U.S. Embassy stamp on mother’s passport and the supporting Kenyan birth certificate showing her, a U.S. citizen, is the mother, or Obama’s mom brings him across the border from Vancouver, Canada, to Washington State to start college in the fall of 1961.

The date of arrival back in the USA is on or about 4 Aug 1961. Obama II would likely be a few weeks old by that time putting his real date of birth sometime in mid or early July 1961 in Kenya.

Child’s U.S. grandmother is very much beside herself at this change in plans by her daughter, the mother of the child. The child’s grandmother then knowing or learning from legal advisers how lax Hawaiian birth registration laws were in 1961, then cooks up a plan and scheme with the child’s mother, to lie to Hawaiian officials and swear and sign an affidavit at the birth registry office that the child was born in Hawaii at home on 4 Aug 1961, the circa date of return to the USA and not the real date of birth, with no witnesses but them, in order to get the child U.S. citizenship (a highly desirable status) to make future travel and life easier on the family and new child.

They committed this fraud and lie and cover-up simply to gain U.S. citizenship for the child, a highly coveted status for any child, not knowing that this child might someday grow up and try to become the President and thus risk having their fraud, plans, and lies exposed.

Birth registration office then routinely issues the announcements to the two newspapers, as was the office’s custom at the time, i.e., to send the papers lists of babies birth registrations, of the birth event which at its source was only based on the false sworn testimony of the grandmother or mother.  If the mother was not in Hawaii at the time, the grandmother may have even forged Stanley Ann (nee Dunham) Obama’s signature on the affidavit since there is no independent corroborative evidence that Stanley Ann Dunham Obama was even in Hawaii in Aug 1961. There is no record of Stanley Ann Dunham Obama being in HI or anywhere in the USA from circa the very early spring of 1961 until she shows up in Seattle WA with her infant child in late Aug or early Sep 1961. Thus the birth notices in the newspapers are not independent data; they came from the same source, the false sworn statements from the mother and/or grandmother that the child Obama II was born in Hawaii.

Thus under this narrative the birth records in the vaults in Hawaii may be simply sworn affidavits of the mother and grandmother saying Obama was born at home with no witnesses, all based on lies and fraud, which seems to be a common occurrence with Mr. O’s entire life. Obama’s birth may be REGISTERED as having occurred in Hawaii, but he was not physically born there.

In addition a couple years later Obama II may have been legally adopted by Lolo Soetoro in Hawaii (with those records hidden to us like many other records for Obama).  Lolo was the 2nd husband of Stanley Ann Dunham Obama.  Thus, Obama’s legal name of record in the Hawaiian system is now still Barry Soetoro or Soebarkah, or something else.  Thus Obama cannot show the world what Hawaiian authorities are sending him and thus the need to forge and alter document before proffering them to the world via the internet images.  Possibly he is quietly and secretly working to have his named changed back to Barack Hussein Obama II in the Hawaii system and/or circa 2007-2009 even having an amended birth certificate entered into the Hawaiian Health Department system to support Obama’s own self-created life narrative.  That would allow the HI authorities to say in a carefully parsed and worded statement that the “birth records” in their possession match the data that Obama has put out. It may now now match for key points in Obama’s created life narrative, but it did not prior to Obama probably amending his birth records in the HI system (i.e., whatever original was filed in 1961 and subsequent adoption changes made a few years later). He likely decided to file the amended birth record after he decided to run for President.  Thus one would expect to find more than one amendment of the his original birth registration which was likely a falsified registration using the lax birth registration laws in HI.  Also notice that the HI authorities never say that the PDF document on the White House servers is an identical 100% true and correct copy of exactly what they have in their birth record system in HI. The HI authorities are into this cover-up for Obama up to their eyeballs but they still are trying to maintain plausible deniability by carefully parsing their statements and letters to those who inquire and those that they choose to answer and not just ignore.

Click on Image to See Larger Copy

When the truth and facts do finally come out, it will be interesting to see how close this suggested narrative using the facts, data, statements, which we now have access to from two sides of the world, which I have analyzed as an experienced genealogist and composed this narrative to fit that data in hand thus far, actually fits the reality of what happened back in the spring and summer of 1961.

This suggested narrative is thus hereby offered to the world to explain events and facts as revealed thus far.  It is subject to change as new facts emerge. Questions, comments, and feedback are welcome … OBOT [Obama Zombie Robot, aka OZBOT] disinformation and misinformation spreading types excepted of course. The OBOTS are reminded to re-read the blog rules near the bottom of the right frame.

Get a PDF file and printer friendly copy of this report here:  http://www.scribd.com/doc/83877512/A-Suggested-Narrative-to-Explain-Hawaii-Birth-Records-With-Obama-Born-in-Kenya-by-CDR-Kerchner-Ret

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
Lehigh Valley PA USA

P.S.  A radio show appearance I did back in August 2009 in which I explained much of the above on air to Bill Cunningham as I had it formulated in my mind then which is of course updated above: CDR Kerchner (Ret) on Bill Cunningham Show – WLW 700 Cincinnati OH – Aug 2009

P.P.S.  Obama’s key identity documents are forged per Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio “cold case posse” investigation:  http://www.scribd.com/doc/83682940/AZ-Sheriff-Joe-Arpaio-Cold-Case-Posse-Report-Obama-Docs-Forged

P.P.P.S.  Of course no matter where he was born he can never be a “natural born Citizen” of the United States since his father was a foreign national, not even an immigrant, and never a Citizen of the United States.  Read why here: Citizen at Birth” is not logically identically equal to a “natural born Citizen at Birth

“The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of liberalism they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation without knowing how it happened.” Ronald Reagan alerting us to Norman Thomas’ and the socialist/progressives’ long-term stealth agenda to transform the USA from a constitutional republic into a top-down, central controlled, socialist form of government.


8 thoughts on “A Suggested Narrative – How Obama is Born in Kenya and yet has a Hawaiian Birth Registration Record”

  1. Believe me, the investigative journalists in the liberal media could easily find that out. They should be challenged to do so. They are all committing treason by acquiescing and allowing fraud and usurpation to take place.

  2. I have a much simpler explanation which eliminates all the dubious circumstances that would have been highly unlikely for an 18 year single girl traveling alone internationally in 1961. Here’s from The Vancouver Scenario http://h2ooflife.wordpress.com/the-vancouver-scenario/

    His mother was only 18 years old and unlikely to have had a passport, nor the desire or finances to be globe trotting. So how could she not give birth in Hawaii? There is only one possibility. There is impeccable testimony from Barbara Nelson who had a conversation with her friend’s father in a Hawaiian dinner club, a Dr. West, who remarked that “Stanley had a baby” and his name was most remarkable; Barack Hussein Obama, the same first name as her father, to whom she wrote about the coincidence. The words “had a baby” might have been “has a baby” or “had a baby…[as in -sometime recently]” (A nearly half-century old memory is very unreliable when it comes to the details of words spoken)

    So mother and baby Obama were in Hawaii sometime shortly after his birth (if not during), so how could she also have been out of state and country to deliver him outside the United States? There is only one possibility. It’s this.

    Stanley had moved four times before reaching her teens, so she had no long term roots. But she developed some after the family moved to the Seattle area where she spent all of her formative teen years, until they moved again to Hawaii after her High School graduation. She enrolled in college in Honolulu and attended the fall/winter and spring semeters. Then she was free for the summer. Since she missed her previous life and friends in Seattle, she decided, even though 7 months pregnant, to return for a visit. So she purchased a two-way ticket and flew to Seattle. She liked being there so much that she decided to extend her stay somewhat longer, and soon she was so close to her delivery date that it wasn’t acceptable to fly, so she stayed put knowing she would have to find a place for the birth. For whatever reason, she chose Canada, probably, Vancouver.
    After a few days of recovery, she flew back to Hawaii where she had the baby examined and his birth registered with the vital records office by filling out an affidavit that stated the facts. Those facts did not bar her from obtaining a Hawaiian birth record of some type since she was a Hawaiian resident. But she had a problem. She loved Seattle and the school there was much preferable to her (with friends attending?) than the Hawaiian college. And how awkward would it have been to run into the father while attending classes in Hawaii when she knew that he was a lying bigamist who had taken advantage of her? So she decided to return permanently, which, according to undisputed accounts, she did two weeks later, and enrolled in college.
    How can this be proven? Or disproven? I have no idea, but first the focus should be on simply finding a factual error or logic error in it.
    Adrien Nash http://obama–nation.com

    CDR KERCHNER’s COMMENT: @Mr. Nash: The major problem with your suggested alternative narrative is that it requires one to TOTALLY throw away all the statements that came out of Kenya from family over there, Kenyan assembly members, and Kenyan newspapers long before he ran for president that Obama was born over there. Any suggested narrative must address and plausibly explain how those Kenyan birth statements came about as part of one’s suggested alternative narrative, if one’s narrative asserts Obama II was born somewhere else other than in Kenya. You cannot simply just totally ignore those statements by people over there and the many African newspaper accounts that Obama was born in Kenya like they don’t exist.

  3. An interesting bit of evidence was uncovered by Sheriff Arpaio during his investigation of Obama’s BC and Selective Service Registration. I found the evidence pertaining to the SS Registration to be plausible. Another tidbit he issued which I read on WND was omitted from ABC’s news report of Arpaio’s findings. Actually I was very surprised to even see ABC report on it since they are usually so pro Obama. Arpaio discovered that the immigration records for transcontinental flights were missing from the Archives for flights arriving that entire week of Obama’s “reported” birth date. Of course, with those records missing it brings the question, was Obama listed as an immigrant on some intercontinental flight immigration record? And is that why the records are missing, because obama had the records pulled so as not to be exposed. He has definite suppressed all of his records to keep his past a secret. He refused to appear in the recent court hearing regarding his status. Try that if you are a regular citizen, just refuse to appear in court…they will issue a warrant for your arrest.

    I agree with Charles that even without confirmation of place of birth, obama is not eligible to be a candidate for President as he is not a natural born president since his father was NOT a US Citizen.

    If Arpaio also investigated Obama’s SS # that was not mentioned…but it’s one point i would have liked for him to investigate. I’ve read other reports that he never lived in Connecticut but his SS # was issued from there. Also have read there is at least one other name associated with Obama’s SS number…that other name is Harrison J. Bounel. Also have read that Obams’s SS number was put thru E Verify and the report was that it is likely that person is illegal. Numbers USA, an organization in favor of reducing all immigration numbers, had a ling for anyone to E Verify themselves. I used the tool, putting in my information ( I am a US born citizen) and I passed with flying colors.

    Questions i have are why would we allow Media to handle something so important as vetting candidates for US Presidency and why are our Congress members supporting this fraud that’s been perpetrated on the US Citizens.

  4. Under British Law at the time, would Stanley Ann have become a British subject when (if) she married BHO Sr. giving her legal dual-citizenship status? (I assume that it was prior to the 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution (ratified in 1920) that women’s citizenship was determined by he husband’s status.)

  5. Under US law passed as the Nationality Act of 1940, as well as the Cable Act of 1922, American women were deemed to not have willingly intended to renounce their US citizenship merely by marrying a foreigner and so the practice of expatriation by marriage was to have ended. But a statement I discovered that was made by the Attorney General in the INS Interpretations in 1969 indicates that it was not the policy of the government to adhere to the prohibition against expatriating American women, even though he understood full well what the Congress had passed and the Supreme Court had upheld. Go figure. It makes no sense and yet there the statement sits implying that in 1961 the INS still expatriated American women married to foreigners, -at least under some circumstances not mentioned.

    The testimonies from Kenyans present a strong argument in favor of their validity, as long as they aren’t evidence of enthusiastic group-think following Obama’s election. Credence must be given to the testimony of credible men and women, but with reservation concerning statement made by adoring fans who are willing to believe anything that makes them feel proud. Each statement must be judged on its own merits. The credible ones may constitute a number sufficient to make the Kenyan scenario highly credible. I’ve read a number of them in the past but not one of them was attended by any detail of the source of the belief nor of the credibility of the person making the claim. Without those details one is left wondering about the limitless human capacity to believe wonderful things, such as the cults that firmly believed the end would come on a certain day at a certain hour and sold all of their worldly belonging in advance of the day.

    Editor’s comment: Read the various accounts from Kenya and Africa by officials and newspapers over many years gathered in this collection:

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: